Abstract
Objective
To detail a modified surgical technique for implantation of the Osia 2 Bone Conduction Hearing Aid (BCHA) system and to assess intra- and postoperative outcomes of this technique.Methods
A retrospective review was performed for cases undergoing implantation of an Osia 2 BCHA at a tertiary academic medical center. Modifications were made to the surgical procedure including: horizontal or curvilinear incisions, placement of the osseointegrated screw slightly superior to the plane of the external auditory canal, and double layer wound closure. Data regarding outcomes including demographics, incision type, surgical time, drilling requirements, and complications were collected using the electronic medical record.Results
A total of twenty-eight cases were evaluated with 57.1% and 42.9% utilizing horizontal and curved incisions, respectively. The median age for recipients was 43.1 years with six pediatric cases included in the study. Median operative time was 58 min (43-126 min). The majority of cases required minimal (60.7%) or no drilling (28.6%) with a significant increase in operative time for those requiring moderate drilling versus minimal to no drilling (F = 8.02, p = 0.002). There were no intraoperative complications. One (3.6%) postoperative seroma occurred which resolved with conservative management.Conclusion
The proposed modified surgical technique is a safe and effective method for implantation of the transcutaneous BCHA system with a low complication rate. Keys include incision design, implant placement, and two-layered closure to minimize wound tension. These modifications can improve ease of the procedure and reduce operative time. These techniques also appear to be applicable to the pediatric population.Level of evidence
3 Laryngoscope, 134:2401-2404, 2024.Similar Articles
To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.
Canal atresia: "surgery or implantable hearing devices? The expert's question is revisited".
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 71(3):367-374, 29 Dec 2006
Cited by: 22 articles | PMID: 17196671
Congenital aural atresia: bone-anchored hearing aid vs. external auditory canal reconstruction.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 76(2):272-277, 15 Dec 2011
Cited by: 40 articles | PMID: 22177319
Early surgical and audiologic outcomes of active, transcutaneous, osseointegrated bone-conduction hearing device (Osia 2® system) placement.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 156:111114, 17 Mar 2022
Cited by: 4 articles | PMID: 35314374
Surgery for the bone-anchored hearing aid.
Adv Otorhinolaryngol, 71:47-55, 08 Mar 2011
Cited by: 6 articles | PMID: 21389704
Review