Europe PMC Pseudomonas putida KT2440.">Pseudomonas putida KT2440.">
Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Europe PMC requires Javascript to function effectively.

Either your web browser doesn't support Javascript or it is currently turned off. In the latter case, please turn on Javascript support in your web browser and reload this page.

This website requires cookies, and the limited processing of your personal data in order to function. By using the site you are agreeing to this as outlined in our privacy notice and cookie policy.

Abstract 


Importance

Investigating fundamental aspects of metabolism is vital for advancing our understanding of the diverse biochemical capabilities and biotechnological applications of bacteria. The origin of the essential thymidylate kinase function in the model bacterium Pseudomonas putida KT2440, seemingly interrupted due to the presence of a large genomic island that disrupts the cognate gene, eluded a satisfactory explanation thus far. This is a first-case example of an essential metabolic function, likely acquired by horizontal gene transfer, which "landed" in a locus encoding the same activity. As such, foreign DNA encoding an essential dNMPK could immediately adjust to the recipient host-instead of long-term accommodation and adaptation. Understanding how these functions evolve is a major biological question, and the work presented here is a decisive step toward this direction. Furthermore, identifying essential and accessory genes facilitates removing those deemed irrelevant in industrial settings-yielding genome-reduced cell factories with enhanced properties and genetic stability.

Free full text 


Logo of mbioLink to Publisher's site
mBio. 2023 Sep-Oct; 14(5): e01081-23.
Published online 2023 Sep 21. https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.01081-23
PMCID: PMC10653934
PMID: 37732760

Recursive genome engineering decodes the evolutionary origin of an essential thymidylate kinase activity in Pseudomonas putida KT2440

Nicolas T. Wirth, Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, 1 Katja Rohr, Investigation, Methodology, 1 Antoine Danchin, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft, 2 and Pablo I. Nikel, Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review and editingcorresponding author 1
María Mercedes Zambrano, Editor
María Mercedes Zambrano, Corporación CorpoGen, Bogotá D.C., Colombia,

Associated Data

Supplementary Materials
ABSTRACT

Thymidylate kinases (TMPKs) play an essential role in DNA biosynthesis across all domains of life by catalyzing dTMP phosphorylation to dTDP. In Pseudomonas putida KT2440, a model Gram-negative soil bacterium, tmk is disrupted by a 65-kb genomic island (GI), posing questions about the origin of the essential TMPK function. To solve this long-standing evolutionary riddle, we addressed three competing hypotheses: (i) assembly of two Tmk segments into a functional protein, (ii) complementation by a deoxynucleotide monophosphate kinase encoded within the GI, or (iii) fulfillment of the essential function by the product of PP_3363, yet another gene annotated as “thymidylate kinase.” Systematic genome engineering, quantitative physiology and targeted proteomics, complementation assays, phylogenetic analysis, and structure homology modeling were combined to investigate the role of genes within the GI. Our findings revealed that the GI-encoded dNMPK gene PP_1964 plays a critical role in complementing the disrupted TMPK function—exposing a non-essential character for the native PP_3363 gene and the tmk pseudogene. This dNMPK was found to be structurally related to that of bacteriophage T4, as part of a distinct evolutionary domain connected to mobile genetic elements and phages. The recursive genome reduction approach in this work deepens our understanding of the genetic architecture of a model bacterium while it provides evidence that the essential TMPK function has been acquired by horizontal gene transfer. Furthermore, the insights gained in the present study have broader implications for understanding the essentiality and functionality of dNMPK homologs in other bacteria.

IMPORTANCE

Investigating fundamental aspects of metabolism is vital for advancing our understanding of the diverse biochemical capabilities and biotechnological applications of bacteria. The origin of the essential thymidylate kinase function in the model bacterium Pseudomonas putida KT2440, seemingly interrupted due to the presence of a large genomic island that disrupts the cognate gene, eluded a satisfactory explanation thus far. This is a first-case example of an essential metabolic function, likely acquired by horizontal gene transfer, which “landed” in a locus encoding the same activity. As such, foreign DNA encoding an essential dNMPK could immediately adjust to the recipient host—instead of long-term accommodation and adaptation. Understanding how these functions evolve is a major biological question, and the work presented here is a decisive step toward this direction. Furthermore, identifying essential and accessory genes facilitates removing those deemed irrelevant in industrial settings—yielding genome-reduced cell factories with enhanced properties and genetic stability.

KEYWORDS: Pseudomonas putida, thymidylate kinase, prophage, bacterial evolution, genome reduction, horizontal gene transfer, genome engineering
INTRODUCTION

Pseudomonas putida KT2440 is a Gram-negative, soil-dwelling bacterium that became a model bacterial chassis for both fundamental research and synthetic biology due to its versatile metabolism, stress resistance and robustness under harsh operating conditions (1 3). Among many other applications, both wild-type and engineered strains of P. putida have been implemented for xenobiotic biodegradation (4), biopolymer and biofuel production (5) and even new-to-nature biocatalysis (6). However, despite the wealth of knowledge amassed on the metabolic pathways and physiological properties of P. putida, significant gaps remain in our understanding of some essential genes and their functions. A bacterial chassis for synthetic biology is made up of a core set of genes that are not susceptible to voluntary alteration, together with specific genes that encode a number of functions of interest (e.g., physiological traits relevant for industrial applications) (7 9). Thymidylate kinase (TMPK; EC 2.7.4.9) belongs to the conserved set of genes in any given bacterial chassis (10 12). However, the gene encoding this function in P. putida KT2440 is interrupted by a DNA insert of foreign origin, and the biochemical process that allows the cell to perform the essential TMPK function is yet to be identified—an evolutionary riddle that has eluded a convincing explanation in spite of decades of research in P. putida metabolism.

The synthesis of deoxynucleoside diphosphates represents the limiting step of DNA biosynthesis (Fig. 1A), with TMPK playing the essential role of catalyzing the ATP-dependent phosphorylation of deoxythymidine 5′-monophosphate (dTMP) to deoxythymidine 5′-diphosphate (dTDP; Fig. 1B). The substrate of TMPK, dTMP, originates either from the thymidine kinase (TK; EC 2.7.1.21)-dependent salvage pathway or the thymidylate synthase (TS; EC 2.1.1.45)-mediated de novo biosynthesis pathway. TMPK belongs to the NMP kinase family, characterized by a highly conserved fold across all three domains of life (13)—but displaying a less conserved amino acid sequence (14). These enzymes possess three crucial segments: the LID domain, the NMP binding domain and the CORE domain. The flexible LID domain partially encloses the phosphate donor to facilitate phosphate transfer, while the CORE domain encompasses the phosphate binding loop (P-loop) and the ATP binding site. The P-loop in the NMP domain contains structural elements vital for substrate recognition and catalysis, binding and positioning the α and β phosphoryl groups of ATP (15). The essentiality of these biochemical reactions (and, in particular, the TMPK-mediated formation of dTDP) has been explored and validated in several organisms, including Escherichia coli (16), Saccharomyces cerevisiae (17) and human cells (18).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is mbio.01081-23.f001.jpg

Biochemistry and genetics underlying de novo biosynthesis of pyrimidine deoxyribonucleotides in Pseudomonas putida KT2440. (A) Overview of the biochemical pathways involved in the formation of CTP and UTP (i.e., RNA building blocks) as well as dCTP and dTTP (i.e., DNA components). Genes encoding key enzymes are indicated alongside the relevant reaction, together with the relevant cofactors. (B) Biochemical reaction catalyzed by thymidine 5′-monophosphate kinase (TMPK). (C) Chromosomal locus bearing the TMPK-encoding gene tmk in P. putida KT2440. This gene is disrupted by a genetic island (tmk GI) composed of 60 coding sequences (CDS). (D) Genetic designs implemented in this study to explore the (potential) essential nature of tmk and PP_1964 (annotated as a dGMP/dTMP/dihydroxy-CMP kinase). The and × symbols indicate success or failure, respectively, in the implementation of each of the depicted genetic architectures. Abbreviations are as follows: dcd, deoxycytidine deaminase; dut, dUTP diphosphatase (i.e., dUTPase); fabF, enoyl-coenzyme A (CoA) hydratase; holB, subunit α of the DNA polymerase III; pabC, p-aminobenzoate synthase; tyrB, tyrosine synthase; ndk, nucleoside diphosphate kinase (i.e., NDPK); nrdA, subunit α of the ribonucleoside-diphosphate reductase; nrdB, subunit β of the ribonucleoside-diphosphate reductase; pyrG, CTP synthase (i.e., CTPS); thyA, thymidylate synthase; tmk, thymidine 5′-monophosphate kinase (i.e., TMPK); tmkEc , tmk gene from Escherichia coli MG1655; SEM11, P. putida strain (derived from reduced-genome P. putida SEM10) carrying a Δtmk GI::dNMPK Pp element in the chromosome.

The KEGG database fails to identify a TMPK activity in P. putida KT2440 (19), in line with the observations reported when the genome sequence of this bacterium was re-annotated (20)—such metabolic scenario is, however, extremely unlikely considering the enzyme essentiality. The canonical tmk gene, present in other Pseudomonas strains as an intact coding sequence (CDS), is disrupted by a 65-kb genomic island (GI) in P. putida KT2440 (21) and its parental strain, P. putida mt-2. This GI, which structurally resembles a prophage (22), is one of the largest found in the chromosome of this strain, splitting the tmk gene into two segments of 294 bp and 339 bp, respectively (Fig. 1C). The integration and potential inactivation of tmk without any apparent detrimental effect on the organism’s prototrophy is all the more intriguing in light of the fact that the downstream end of the gene overlaps with the holB gene. HolB is the δ′-subunit of DNA polymerase III, which plays a major role in DNA synthesis during chromosomal replication (23, 24). The inserted GI contains an arsenate resistance operon and a cluster of biosynthesis genes (25, 26), flanked by a site-specific recombinase (encoded by PP_1962) with strong homology to the XerC integrase of bacteriophage λ (27). Such a genome structure is absent in all five closely related P. putida strains that have been sequenced (28) and further contains three additional mobile genetic elements (i.e., PP_5490; a site-specific DNA recombinase of the Tn3 family; PP_1931, an IS1182-like element of the ISPpu16 family transposase; and PP_1960, a site-specific integrase)—which may indicate horizontal gene transfer. The very last gene in the GI of strain KT2440, PP_1964, is predicted to encode a deoxynucleotide monophosphate kinase (dGMP/dTMP/dihydroxy-CMP kinase or, in short, dNMPK Pp ).

Three hypotheses could explain the lack of an identified TPMK in P. putida KT2440. In particular, (i) the two tmk gene segments could be expressed separately and assembled into a functional TMPK protein, (ii) the GI-encoded dNMPK Pp complements the TMPK function, or (iii) another gene within the P. putida KT2440 genome (i.e., outside the tmk locus) fulfills this essential reaction. Here, we sought to elucidate the essentiality and functional roles of genes within the GI flanked by the two tmk moieties in P. putida KT2440. Combining recursive chromosomal modifications (via stitching, re-shuffling, and systematic gene deletions and insertions) with complementation experiments, quantitative physiology, proteomics, phylogenetic analysis and homology modeling, our work resolves the long-standing question of the critical dNMPK Pp role and the GI wherein the gene lies. By deepening our understanding of the genetic architecture and metabolic capabilities of model environmental bacteria, we are paving the way for further exploitation of P. putida both in fundamental and applied research.

RESULTS

Systematic genome engineering of P. putida KT2440 identifies PP_1964, and not tmk, as essential for nucleotide metabolism

In order to explore the three hypotheses advanced to explain the origin and functionality of dNMPK Pp , we adopted a synthetic biology approach whereby a series of genetic constructs were designed and tested in P. putida KT2440 (Fig. 1D; Table 1). The gene annotated as to encode an alternative thymidylate kinase, PP_3363 (20), was chosen as a first obvious target. This CDS had not been deemed essential in the high-quality genome-scale metabolic reconstruction of P. putida KT2440 (29) and nor had it been identified as necessary for citrate-dependent growth of this strain (30). Additionally, we could not find experimental validation of its predicted function for any of the 159 homologs identified via BLAST search (details not shown). The amino acid sequence of PP_3363 shares a 22.4% sequence identity with TMPK of P. putida F1, one of the sequenced strains closest to P. putida KT2440 (21). Moreover, this protein has a maximum identity of 22% with bacterial TMPKs whose structure has been fully solved—e.g., 5TMP from E. coli (17.24%) and 4EDH from P. aeruginosa (20.5%). In contrast, P. putida F1 TMPK shares an 80.5% identity with P. aeruginosa PAO1 TMPK and a 50.5% identity with E. coli MG1655 TMPK. It was thus not surprising that PP_3363 could be deleted without any observable growth defects (Table 1), indicating that this supposed “thymidylate kinase” is not essential in P. putida KT2440.

TABLE 1

Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study

StrainRelevant characteristics a Reference or source
Escherichia coli
 DH5α λpir Cloning host; F λ endA1 glnX44(AS) thiE1 recA1 relA1 spoT1 gyrA96(NalR) rfbC1 deoR nupG Φ80(lacZΔM15) Δ(argF-lac)U169 hsdR17(rK mK + ), λpir lysogen (31)
 MG1655Wild-type strain; F λ ilvG rfb-50 rph-1  (32)
 JHR114Derivative of strain MG1655, Δtmk araC/PBAD tmkMt ; SmR  (33)
Pseudomonas putida
 KT2440Derivative of P. putida mt-2 (34) cured of the TOL plasmid pWW0 (35)
 EM42Derivative of strain KT2440; Δprophage1 Δprophage4 Δprophage3 Δprophage2 ΔTn7ΔendA-1 ΔendA-2 ΔhsdRMS Δflagellum ΔTn4652  (36)
 SEM10Derivative of strain EM42; ΔPP_0052 ΔPP_0772 ΔPP_1239 ΔPP_1775 ΔPP_1952 ΔPP_2045 ΔPP_2876 ΔPP_3291 ΔbenABCD ΔpvdD  (37)
 ΔPP_3363 Derivative of strain KT2440; ΔPP_3363 This work
 NTW1804Derivative of strain KT2440; Δtmk GI::tmkEc This work
 NTW1797Derivative of strain KT2440; Δtmk GI xylS/PmPP_1964 This work
 NTW1788Derivative of strain KT2440; Δtmk GI araC/ParaB PP_1964 This work
 NTW1835Derivative of strain KT2440; Δtmk GI λT1|PmPP_1964 This work
 NTW1834Derivative of strain KT2440; Δtmk GI TS |PmPP_1964 This work
 NTW1283Derivative of strain SEM10; Δtmk.A This work
 NTW1282Derivative of strain SEM10; Δtmk GI::tmkEc This work
 SEM11Derivative of strain SEM10; Δtmk GI::PP_1964 This work
Plasmids
 pGNW2Suicide vector used for genetic manipulations in Gram-negative bacteria; oriT, traJ, lacZα, ori(R6K), P 14g(BCD2)→msfGFP; KmR  (38)
 pSNW2Derivative of vector pGNW2; with the msfGFP translation initiation sequence replaced by the strong BCD2 translational coupler (37)
 pQURE6·HConditionally-replicating vector; XylS/PmI-SceI and P14g(BCD2)→mRFP; GmR  (37)
 pSNW2∙Δtmk.A Derivative of vector pSNW2 carrying HAs to delete the tmk part upstream of the GI in P. putida KT2440This work
 pSNW2∙ΔPP_1964 Derivative of vector pSNW2 carrying HAs to delete PP_1964 This work
 pSNW2∙Δtmk GI Derivative of vector pSNW2 carrying HAs to delete the entire GI including tmk that it disruptedThis work
 pSNW2∙stitch-tmk Derivative of vector pSNW2 carrying HAs to delete the entire GI, restoring the original tmk sequenceThis work
 pSNW2∙PmPP_1964 Derivative of vector pSNW2 carrying PmPP_1964 flanked by HAs for integration between PP_1971 and PP_t63 This work
 pSNW2∙xylS/PmPP_1964 Derivative of vector pSNW2 carrying xylS/PmPP_1964 flanked by HAs for integration between PP_1971 and PP_t63 This work
 pSNW2∙araC/
 ParaB PP_1964
Derivative of vector pSNW2 carrying araC/ParaB PP_1964 flanked by HAs for integration between PP_1971 and PP_t63 This work
 pSNW2∙PmPP_1964 Derivative of vector pSNW2 carrying PmPP_1964, flanked by HAs for integration between PP_1971 and PP_t63 This work
 pSNW2∙TS |PmPP_1964 Derivative of vector pSNW2 carrying the strong transcriptional terminator TS (39) isolating PmPP_1964, flanked by HAs for integration between PP_1971 and PP_t63 This work
 pSNW2∙Δtmk GI::tmkEc Derivative of vector pSNW2 carrying HAs to replace the entire GI including tmk that it disrupted with tmkEc This work
 pSNW2∙Δtmk GI:: PP_1964 Derivative of vector pSNW2 carrying HAs to replace the entire GI including tmk that it disrupted with tmkEc This work
 pMBEC6∙PP_1964 Derivative of the multiplex base-editing plasmid pMBEC6 (40) harboring three synthetic gRNAs targeting PP_1964 This work
 pEX128·gRNAPlasmid carrying a template gRNA scaffold; AmpR  (40)
 pRHA-CDC8Derivative of vector pACYC184 (41); rhaRS/PrhaBAD , oriV(p15A), CDC8 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, C-terminal FLAG epitope; CmR TcR  (33)
 pRHA·tmkEc Derivative of vector pRHA-CDC8 containing rhaRS/PrhaBAD tmkEc , CmR TcR  (33)
 pRHA·tmkPa Derivative of vector pRHA-CDC8 containing rhaRS/PrhaBAD tmkPa , CmR TcR  (33)
 pRHA·PP_1964 Derivative of vector pRHA-CDC8 containing rhaRS/PrhaBAD PP_1964, CmR TcR This work
 pSEVA441Standard cloning vector; oriV(pRO1600/ColE1); SmR  (42, 43)
 pSEVA4418Derivative of vector pSEVA441; rhaRS/PrhaBAD , oriV(pRO1600/ColE1); SmR This work
 pS4418∙tmkEc Derivative of vector pSEVA441 containing rhaRS/PrhaBAD tmkEc from plasmid pRHA-tmkEc as cargo; SmR This work
a Antibiotic markers: Amp, ampicillin; Cm, chloramphenicol; Km, kanamycin; Gm, gentamicin; Sm, streptomycin; and Tc, tetracyclin. HA, homology arms.

Next, we attempted to remove the entire GI comprising the prophage (tmk GI) and the two flanking tmk halves (a design termed Δtmk GI, Fig. 1D) to expose a potential TMPK activity encoded outside this genome region. In this specific genetic design, the holB gene was left in the exact genome context where tmk was originally located—thereby using the regulatory features of tmk. However, we were unable to implement this genetic architecture in spite of multiple attempts, suggesting that the gene cluster harbors essential functions (and, most likely, a TMPK activity). We then aimed at recovering the intact tmk gene by stitching its two halves together and removing the intervening GI. The resulting CDS, cloned on the pSNW2 suicide vector to perform the stitching procedure (plasmid pSNW2∙stich-tmk; Table 1), has the same length as the tmk gene from other Pseudomonas species. Indeed, the resulting reconstituted tmk sequence should encode a protein displaying 99.5% amino acid sequence identity to TMPK from P. putida F1, with only a single amino acid substitution close to the C-terminus. This approach did not work despite numerous implementation efforts, including the use of CRISPR-Cas9 counter-selection (38), even though P. putida KT2440 tmk has >98% identity with orthologs of several other Pseudomonas species (e.g., P. taiwanensis VLB120, P. putida CFA, or P. putida DOT1E). Restoring the original CDS by stitching the two tmk fragments of strain KT2440 failed also when modifying the predicted translational coupling architecture with the holB gene to 5′-TGATG-3′. In this modification, the STOP codon of tmk, highlighted in bold, should overlap with the START codon of holB, indicated in italics. To further investigate the essentiality of the split tmk CDS, we further performed a defined deletion of the upstream half (Δtmk.A, Fig. 1D), which succeeded without any noticeable changes in growth phenotypes under several growth conditions (results not shown). In contrast, we were unable to remove the GI-encoded dNMPK Pp gene PP_1964dNMPK, Fig. 1D)—indicating that it might be essential.

Overall, these results indicate that the gene clusters within the GI of strain KT2440, which has a strong structural resemblance with a prophage, contain essential functions and further suggest that this activity may reside in dNMPK Pp . Therefore, to further test if the PP_1964 CDS encodes a dTMPK function, we conducted a series of experiments that involved replacing the entire gene cluster with either a tmk gene from E. coli or the native PP_1964, the details of which are outlined in the next section.

The entire GI can be excised from the chromosome of P. putida KT2440 via functional replacement with either tmk from E. coli or the endogenous PP_1964 gene

Based on the experimental evidence described above, it appeared that dNMPK Pp plays an essential function encoded in the GI gene clusters of P. putida. To further substantiate this idea, the entire tmk-prophage gene cluster was replaced with the tmk gene from E. coli MG1655 (tmkEc ), yielding P. putida NTW1804 (Table 1). Such functional replacement (Δtmk GI::tmkEc , Fig. 1D) succeeded readily, indicating that TMPK is indeed the essential function encoded within the viral GI region. In this strategy, holB was translationally coupled to the tmkEc gene via the aforementioned genetic configuration (5′-TGATG-5′). In a previous study by Páez-Espino et al. (28), deletion of the ars1 operon, encoded within the tmk GI region, amplified the sensitivity of the mutant strain to arsenate (AsO4 3−) salts. We adopted the As(V)-tolerance phenotype as a proxy to explore if the insertion of the synthetic Δtmk GI::tmkEc construct brings about any noticeable physiological response to a KH2AsO4 challenge. When subjected to increasing concentrations of KH2AsO4, up to 300 mM, the growth profiles of the parental P. putida strain were contrastingly different from those of its Δtmk GI::tmkEc derivative, P. putida NTW1804 (Fig. S1 in the Supplemental Material). P. putida NTW1804 exhibited significantly reduced growth rates and prolonged lag times at concentrations equal to and exceeding 25 mM KH2AsO4, while the two strains displayed identical growth at As(V) concentrations up to 5 mM. These observations validated the importance of the ars1 gene cluster in As(V) tolerance, and demonstrated that the entire GI can be functionally replaced with a gene encoding the TMPK enzyme from E. coli without affecting the overall growth phenotype of P. putida KT2440. Furthermore, when P. putida NTW1804 was cultivated in de Bont minimal (DBM) medium under glycolytic (30 mM glucose) or gluconeogenic (30 mM citrate) conditions, or in complex LB medium, the growth phenotype was identical to that of the parental KT2440 strain (results not shown). Building on these preliminary results, we implemented the same functional replacement approach in a genome-reduced variant of P. putida KT2440, strain SEM10 (37). The resulting strain, P. putida NTW1282 (Table 1) exhibited the same growth phenotype as strain SEM10 and the engineered P. putida NTW1804 variant across a range of culture conditions (i.e., complex LB medium and DBM medium added with acetate, glucose or citrate; results not shown), further validating the overall strategy.

Adopting the same framework, we studied the next obvious candidate that could provide the TMPK activity. As indicated above, the very last CDS in the genes clusters encoded in the GI of strain KT2440, PP_1964, is predicted to encode a deoxynucleotide monophosphate kinase (i.e., dGMP/dTMP/dihydroxy-CMP kinase, dNMPK Pp ). Interestingly, the entire GI could also be successfully removed by leaving only PP_1964 under the original transcriptional and translational control sequences of the tmk.A fragment and translationally coupled to holB (Table 1). Furthermore, the resulting strain, P. putida SEM11, showed an almost identical growth phenotype to its parental strains EM42 and SEM10 under various culture conditions (LB medium, DBM medium supplemented with glucose, citrate, or acetate; results not shown).

In particular, using a plate reader experiment in a 24-well plate, cultures of P. putida KT2440 and SEM11 were grown in DBM medium with 30 mM glucose. The engineered strain displayed faster growth (10% increase in the μ max values) and higher biomass yields (ca. 13% increase) compared to its KT2440 ancestor (Fig. 2A). Taken together, these results also provide evidence that PP_1964 (i.e., dNMPK Pp ) is the bona fide TMPK activity of P. putida.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is mbio.01081-23.f002.jpg

Assessing the impact of genetic modifications on thymidylate kinase function in P. putida KT2440. (A) Growth curves (smoothing splines) of the parental strain and genetic variants with a deletion in the tmk locus and an orthogonally regulated copy of PP_1964. Cells were cultured in 24-well plates in DBM medium supplemented with 30 mM glucose; cell growth was estimated as the optical density measured at 600 nm (OD600). Results represent average values ± standard deviations from three independent biological replicates. The yellow-shaded area indicates sampling at OD600 values between 0.5 and 1.2 to perform quantitative proteomics. (B) dNMPK Pp abundance in the parental and engineered P. putida strains determined via targeted quantitative proteomics. Protein abundance values were normalized to the average dNMPK Pp content obtained for strain KT2440; individual measurements are indicated for three independent biological replicates and the error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals.

Fine-tuning dNMPK Pp levels through synthetic transcriptional control systems reveals a high degree of buffering capacity in the nucleotide metabolism of P. putida KT2440

We reasoned that rendering the expression of PP_1964 titratable through synthetic transcriptional control systems could shed light on essentiality via artificially modulating bacterial growth. Hence, the gene was placed under the control of several orthologous, inducible expression control systems. The first strategy consisted of regulating PP_1964 expression via the XylS/Pm system (44), induced by 3-methylbenzoate (3-mBz). Following a two-step allelic exchange approach, a synthetic construct [containing the T1 terminator from phage λ (i.e., λT1), the xylS gene that encodes the 3-mBz-responsive regulator, the Pm promoter and the PP_1964 gene] was chromosomally inserted into an intergenic region ~5.3 kb downstream of the tmk GI locus, followed by removal of the entire cluster but leaving holB intact. When cultivated in DBM medium containing 30 mM glucose, the resulting mutant strain, P. putida NTW1797 (Table 1), had wild-type-like growth patterns even in the absence of any chemical inducer (Fig. 2A). Indeed, the addition of 3-mBz at concentrations as low as 0.1 mM resulted in a reduced biomass yield (i.e., 21% lower final OD600 values), and supplementing 3-mBz at 1 mM negatively affected the final cell density (reduced by 26%) and μ max (with an 11% slower growth than in the control experiment without 3-mBz supplementation, Fig. S2A in the Supplemental Material). Since 3-mBz is not expected to mediate toxicity in the concentration range used in these experiments (45), the detrimental effect observed could be attributed to the expression of PP_1964. Furthermore, considering that XylS/Pm is known to be a leaky expression system depending on the growth conditions (46), we followed the same allelic replacement strategy, but placed PP_1964 under the transcriptional control of the tight L-arabinose-inducible AraC/PBAD system (47). The resulting mutant strain (P. putida NTW1788, Table 1) was again able to grow in DBM medium under glycolytic conditions in the absence of any inducer (Fig. 2A). The addition of L-arabinose at 0.2% (wt/vol), however, did not result in any significant increase in the μ max and caused only minor increased in biomass yield (7%) of this engineered strain (Fig. S2B in the Supplemental Material).

Assuming that our prior attempts of making PP_1964 conditionally dependent on the addition of inducer compounds failed due to the leakiness of the synthetic systems employed, we sought to control transcription levels via activators provided in trans. To this end, and concomitant with the removal of the tmk GI locus, we placed PP_1964 downstream of an element composed of the T1 terminator of phage λ and the Pm promoter (λT1-Pm). The rationale behind this design was preventing the activation of the Pm promoter in the absence of XylS through regulator-promoter decoupling (48). The last step of our gene editing method, resolving the previously co-integrated suicide plasmid, adopted the suicide plasmid pQURE6, which carries a copy of xylS and two copies of Pm that control the expression of the I-SceI meganuclease gene as well as the replication protein gene trfA [i.e., making plasmid replication dependent on the addition of 3-mBz (37)]. We hypothesized that if there is no transcriptional activity on PP_1964 in the absence of XylS, the resulting mutant strain would be unable to lose pQURE6 after the procedure. However, the engineered strain (P. putida NTW1835, Table 1) readily lost plasmid pQURE6 regardless of 3-mBz addition and showed no growth defects (Fig. 2A).

To further understand the observed phenotypes, a quantitative, whole-proteome analysis was performed on the previously described strains in the absence of any chemical inducer (Fig. 2B). The leakiness of the chromosomally-encoded XylS/Pm system resulted in a threefold increase of the intracellular dNMPK Pp abundance in P. putida NTW1797 as compared to that in strain KT2440. The AraC/PBAD system was indeed the tightest among the tested expression constructs, with an intracellular dNMPK Pp concentration of only ~20% compared to that in the parental P. putida strain. Surprisingly, even in the absence of the XylS activator (strain NTW1835), PP_1964 expression from Pm reached ~80% of the value in the control (Fig. 2B), which may be due to transcriptional read-through from upstream CDSs. Strain SEM11 had dNMPK Pp levels comparable to that of P. putida KT2440 (Fig. 2B). By integrating the information about dNMPK Pp abundance and strain phenotypes gathered thus far, the following picture emerged: (i) deletion of the tmk GI locus and the 60 CDSs encoded therein increases biomass yields, (ii) the metabolism of P. putida KT2440 can tolerate a significant reduction in dNMPK Pp availability without compromising growth and (iii) a drastic increase in dNMPK Pp formation leads to reduced μ max values and biomass yields in glucose cultures.

In a final attempt to make the formation of dNMPK Pp controllable, PP_1964 was placed under the control of the Pm promoter in a different configuration without introducing xylS into the chromosome. In addition, because the λ T1 terminator was suggested to have limited functionality in P. putida (39), the effective transcriptional termination sequence TS was placed upstream of PmPP_1964 to prevent eventual RNA polymerase read-through. Despite these efforts, strain NTW1834 also readily lost plasmid pQURE6 (carrying xylS) in the absence of 3-mBz and, while its growth rate was impaired (25% lower μ max), grew to the same maximum cell densities as the parental strain (Fig. S2C in the Supplemental Material). In fact, if the cells were forced to retain pQURE6 through the addition of gentamicin as well as 3-mBz, the growth rate was further reduced (results not shown). In the absence of the XylS activator and the exclusion of transcriptional read-through, residual expression of PP_1964 can be attributed to unspecific activation of Pm by BenR (PP_3159), which is encoded in strain KT2440 as part of the benzoate degradation pathway (49 51).

Thus far, the implementation of various genetic architectures around the tmk GI locus (Fig. S2D in the Supplemental Material) demonstrated that this large viral DNA segment contains a single essential function, providing TMPK activity with high metabolic buffering capacity. A CRISPR-Cas9-based gene disruption approach through base-editing at the single-nucleotide resolution provided definite evidence for the essentiality of dNMPK Pp in P. putida KT2440, as disclosed in the next section.

CRISPR-Cas9-base-editing and complementation assays expose the essentiality of dNMPK Pp and its role as the sole thymidylate kinase of P. putida KT2440

As illustrated by the genetic designs attempted thus far, the entire GI of P. putida KT2440 (including the two tmk gene moieties) could be successfully removed as long as either PP_1964 was preserved or its function was complemented by a copy of the tmk gene from E. coli. Any attempts to delete PP_1964 via allelic exchange were unsuccessful (details not shown). However, the failure of implementing these genetic manipulations is not a definite proof of gene essentiality (52). Thus, a more reliable strategy was employed to provide conclusive evidence of the role of PP_1964 as the sole source of TMPK activity in strain KT2440. To this end, tmkEc was cloned into the expression vector pSEVA4418, in which tmkEc was placed under the transcriptional control of the L-rhamnose-inducible RhaRS/PrhaBAD system (Table 1). In addition, plasmid pMBEC6∙PP_1964 was constructed to introduce premature STOP (pmSTOP) codons via multiplexed cytidine base-editing (40). This base-editing plasmid encodes three synthetic guide RNAs that target protospacers distributed across the PP_1964 coding sequence (Table 1) and are suitable to introduce pmSTOP codons via C-to-T transitions (Fig. 3A and B). Next, the base-editing plasmid pMBEC6∙PP_1964 was delivered into P. putida SEM11 (Δtmk GI::PP_1964, Table 1) harboring either pSEVA4418 (empty vector, used as a control) or pSEVA4418∙tmkEc (carrying the TMPK-encoding gene from E. coli). After transformation with pMBEC6∙PP_1964, recovery of the cells in liquid LB medium for 24 h and isolation of individual colonies on LB medium plates without any additives, the PP_1964 locus was PCR-amplified and sequenced for 96 randomly picked colonies of each strain (Fig. 3C). All colonies that had received tmkEc in trans exhibited at least one pmSTOP codon in PP_1964, while none of the tested colonies without tmkEc showed any null mutations in any of the targeted protospacer sequences. These findings provide strong evidence that the dNMPK Pp activity encoded in PP_1964 provides the essential TMPK function in P. putida KT2440, as the CDS could only be inactivated if it was simultaneously complemented by tmkEc in trans.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is mbio.01081-23.f003.jpg

Exploring the essentiality of PP_1964 in P. putida KT2440 and assessing thymidylate kinase activity of dNMPK Pp . Plasmid pMBEC6∙PP_1964, encoding a CRISPR-Cas9-guided cytidine base-editing system as well as three synthetic guide RNAs targeting PP_1964, was delivered into strain SEM11 to inactivate the dNMPK Pp gene. (A) Physical map indicating the locations of the three targeted protospacers within the PP_1964 coding sequence. Target cytosine nucleotides that yield premature STOP codons (pmSTOP) upon editing and transition to thymine are highlighted in magenta. Protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) sequences, 5′-NGG-3′ (where N indicates any nucleotide), are drawn in turquoise. Codon triplets are separated by vertical gray lines. (B) Functional principle of the CRISPR-Cas-guided cytidine base-editing system. A nicking Cas9 variant (nCas9, carrying the D10A mutation) fused to a cytidine deaminase is guided to a target locus via a synthetic guide RNA. The cytidine deaminase causes C→T transitions within a defined range in the non-target DNA strand, allowing for the introduction of pmSTOP codons within the open reading frame (43). (C) Fraction of P. putida SEM11 clones harboring pmSTOP codons in PP_1964 in the presence (+) or absence (–) of the E. coli tmk gene (tmkEc ) after the base-editing procedure. Bar plot show the percentage of clones harboring at least one pmSTOP codon out of 96 sequenced P. putida SEM11 colonies with plasmid pRHA·tmkEc (Table 2) or the corresponding empty vector. (D) Droplet assay with E. coli strain JHR114 (Δtmk) harboring a chromosomally encoded tmk gene from Mycobacterium tuberculosis under transcriptional control of the AraC/PBAD expression system (Table 2). This Tmk-deficient E. coli strain was transformed with derivatives of plasmid pRHA encoding either tmkEc , Pseudomonas aeruginosa tmk (tmkPa ) or PP_1964 controlled by the L-rhamnose-inducible RhaRS/PrhaBAD system. Overnight cultures, grown in tryptone medium supplemented with 0.2% (wt/vol) L-arabinose, were serially diluted with 0.9% (wt/vol) NaCl and 8 µL droplets were spotted onto solid tryptone medium supplemented with 25 µg mL–1 streptomycin as well as 0.2% (wt/vol) L-arabinose and 0.2% (wt/vol) L-rhamnose as indicated. Bacterial colonies were photographed after incubating the plates at 37°C for 16 h.

To further demonstrate a role for dNMPK Pp in providing the TMPK function, a complementation assay was performed using E. coli strain JHR114 (Table 1), which harbors a chromosomally-encoded tmk gene from Mycobacterium tuberculosis (tmkMt ) under the control of the AraC/PBAD expression system, with its native tmk copy deleted (33). Hence, the growth of this strain is dependent on the induction of tmkMt via the addition of L-arabinose, making it suitable to screen for thymidylate kinase activities provided in trans. JHR114 was transformed with derivatives of pRHA, harboring either tmkEc, tmk from Pseudomonas aeruginosa (tmkPa , sharing an 80.5% amino acid sequence identity with tmk from P. putida KT2440) or PP_1964 under the transcriptional control of the L-rhamnose-inducible RhaRS/PrhaBAD system. The resulting E. coli strains (i.e., JHR114, and its derivatives carrying plasmids pRHA·tmkEc , pRHA·tmkPa or pRHA·PP_1964, Table 1) were pre-grown in liquid tryptone medium with L-arabinose, serially diluted and spotted onto tryptone agar with or without L-arabinose or L-rhamnose (Fig. 3D). As expected, all strains were able to grow in the presence of L-arabinose, and strain JHR114 without any plasmid was only able to grow in the presence of L-arabinose. Functional complementation of the TMPK activity by tmkEc , tmkPa and PP_1964 could be verified in the presence of L-rhamnose. Surprisingly, the strains transformed with pRHA·tmkEc and pRHA·PP_1964 grew even in the absence of inducers, while JHR114 carrying pRHA·tmkPa did not. In the genetic architecture of vector pRHA, tmkEc , tmkPa , and PP_1964 display almost identical translation initiation rates [computed and predicted with the RBS Calculator tool (53)]—hence, different protein levels should not be the reason behind these phenotypic differences. Thus, Tmk Ec and dNMPK Pp appear to have higher TMPK activities than Tmk Pa, and the leaky transcriptional levels afforded by PrhaBAD sufficed to recover growth. When cultured in M9 minimal medium supplemented with 20 mM glucose, strain JHR114 carrying pRHA·tmkPa was also able to grow, albeit with a severely reduced μ max (Fig. S3 in the Supplemental Material). Addition of L-rhamnose, in contrast, restored growth for all E. coli strains harboring a plasmid. Interestingly, the induction of tmkEc expression resulted in a significant growth impairment which was not observed by overexpressing PP_1964 or tmkPa . The results obtained from the complementation experiments in E. coli confirm the role of dNMPK Pp as a TMPK and expose a remarkable metabolic buffering capacity of this enzyme in bacterial hosts other than P. putida.

Structural alignment and phylogenetic analysis of nucleoside monophosphate kinases

The experimental evidence presented in the preceding sections indicates that the essential PP_1964 (dNMPK Pp ) gene is the only source of TMPK activity in P. putida KT2440. In order to assess the evolutionary relationship of dNMPK Pp with other (deoxy)nucleoside monophosphate kinases, a phylogenetic analysis was conducted across annotated bacterial and viral genomes. To this end, we performed a structural alignment of 200 bacterial adenylate kinases (AMPKs), 200 bacterial guanylate kinases (GMPKs), 200 bacterial TMPK, 200 bacterial uridylate kinases (UMPKs), and 300 enzymes annotated as deoxynucleoside monophosphate kinase in bacteria and 81 dNMPKs found in viruses—representing a sampling space large enough to establish relationships between these functions. Next, this multi-sequence alignment was used to construct a phylogenetic tree (Fig. 4) using FastTree (54) based on the structure-based PROMALS3D alignment (55). Based on the framework proposed by Leipe et al. (56), we assumed that TMPKs belong to the heritage of a common ancestor of P-loop kinases—as this enzyme is the only (d)NMP kinase ubiquitous in Bacteria, Archaea and Eukaryota. Deoxynucleoside monophosphate kinases are closely related to the TMPK group, exemplified by the dNMPK enzyme from λ phage T4 (56 58). Furthermore, AMPKs and GMPKs were proposed to share a common bacterial ancestry distinct from the archaeal-eukaryotic origin of CMPK (59).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is mbio.01081-23.f004.jpg

Phylogenetic tree illustrating the distribution of nucleoside monophosphate kinases in bacteria and viruses. The tree was constructed using FastTree (46) based on a structural PROMALS3D alignment (47) of 200 bacterial adenylate kinases (AMPKs), 200 bacterial guanylate kinases (GMPKs), 200 bacterial TMPKs, 200 bacterial uridylate kinases (UMPKs), and 300 enzymes annotated as (putative) deoxynucleoside monophosphate kinases in bacteria and 81 dNMPKs found in viruses. Specific cases, including enzymes of P. putida KT2440, are indicated with arrows; relative phylogenetic distances are indicated in the branches of the tree when relevant.

The phylogenetic tree underscores a parallel evolution of AMPK and GMPK in bacteria with a similar distance to the TMPK group—although the precise evolutionary relationships of the nucleotide kinases cannot be inferred from the analysis (60). The UMPK group, which shares no significant sequence similarity to other nucleoside monophosphate kinases (61), is clearly positioned as an outlier outside the remaining members of the tree. The enzyme encoded by PP_3363, annotated as thymidylate kinase, is even more isolated—with no apparent relationship to either the TMPK or any other group. Interestingly, the phylogenetic analysis presents a different perspective on the relationship of dNMPKs to the remaining groups, placing them in a distinct evolutionary domain. dNMPKs from both bacteria and viruses are situated closer to bacterial CMKs, which share conserved structural features with other members of the NMP kinase family (62, 63). The dNMPK sub-tree encompassing dNMPK Pp also harbors enzymes from the two archetypal E. coli bacteriophages T4 [i.e., Tequatrovirus T4, which recognizes dGMP, dTMP and 5-hydroxymethyl-dCMP (64)] and T5 [i.e., Tequintavirus T5, which acts on all four canonical dNMPs (65)].

Based on these observations, and to further explore the prevalence, function and evolutionary origin of enzymes in the dNMPK group of the bacterial domain, we conducted a BLASTp search (66) against non-redundant protein sequences (nrPS) using dNMPK Pp as the query and setting a maximum E value of 0.00001. This search identified 871 proteins with the following annotations: adenylate kinase (14 cases), deoxynucleoside monophosphate kinase (667 cases), hypothetical protein (186 cases), nucleoside triphosphate hydrolase, phosphomevalonate kinase, nucleoside triphosphate hydrolase and choline dehydrogenase or related flavoprotein (1 nrPS of each of these categories). The majority of these hits (622 nrPS) were found within the Pseudomonadales order, with additional members of the γ-proteobacteria class (totaling 696 nrPS) encountered in isolates from the Moraxellales, Enterobacterales, Oceanospirillales and Alteromonadales orders. Furthermore, orthologs of dNMPK were identified in β-proteobacteria (93 nrPS), primarily within the large Burkholderiales order (83 nrPS). Additionally, 44 homologs were identified in bacterial phages—predominantly those infecting bacteria within the Enterobacteriaceae family.

To gain an even broader understanding of the distribution and function of dNMPK enzymes, we also examined the sequenced genomes of a diverse sample of organism groups. Our analysis led to several key findings. In γ-proteobacteria, the tmk gene is typically found adjacent to holB—a genetic architecture epitomized in the P. putida KT2440 chromosome (Fig. 1D). We also observed that the disruption of the tmk gene by a GI containing a dNMPK homologue occurred in several members of γ-proteobacteria, including Pseudomonas, Halomonas, Acinetobacter and Psychrobacter—with the size of these GIs varying considerably across isolates. However, despite substantial differences in the cluster length and functional content, a strong conservation of four prophage-associated genes flanking dNMPK was found (Fig. S4 in the Supplemental Material). Moreover, we found that some strains of E. coli, Shigella flexneri or Citrobacter freundii contained prophages carrying potential homologs of dNMPK Pp as well as functional gene sequences for TMPK activities. These prophages were fully integrated into the genomes of their respective bacterial hosts and displayed various levels of decay. We further discovered both an intact tmk gene (adjacent to holB) and an unannotated DNA sequence in a strain of Pseudomonas parafulva (NS96), which, upon translation, showed 44% identity to dNMPK Pp . Interestingly, no evidence for the presence of a prophage could be found in the surrounding genomic context in this case in particular. Finally, we identified dNMPK Pp homologs located adjacent to the holB gene, with sequence identities between 40% and 49% to dNMPK Pp in some β-proteobacteria members, e.g., Parapusillimonas granuli strain DSM 18079 and Alcaligenes faecalis strain JQ135, and also in the γ-proteobacterium Methylomicrobium lacus LW14 (Fig. S4). However, no gene encoding dTMP kinase was detected in these organisms. Additionally, in these cases, no genetic elements associated with mobile genetic elements could be found in the vicinity of the dNMPK gene. The genomic position of the CDS, together with the absence of a tmk gene, suggests that the dNMPK enzymes have adapted to perform the essential TMPK function in these strains—possibly as a result of a unique evolutionary path (67) or a gene-loss event (68). This evolutionary adaptation bears important implications for understanding the functional versatility of dNMPK enzymes and the extent to which they can substitute for other (d)NMP kinases in different microorganisms. Interestingly, our phylogenetic tree reconstruction highlights a close relationship between dNMPK Pp and dNMPK from A. faecalis (dNMPK Af , Fig. 4), implying that both enzymes could display similar substrate specificities.

Drawing from the close structural relationship between dNMPK from bacteriophage T4 of E. coli (acting, as indicated above, on dNMP, dTMP and 5-hydroxymethyl-dCMP) and the enzyme of P. putida KT2440, the next section focuses on the structural aspects of dNMPK Pp , with emphasis on homology modeling and substrate-binding pocket analysis. On this basis, this part of the study aims at elucidating the potential function of the enzyme of strain KT2440 as a TMPK activity and to better understand its unique biochemical characteristics.

Homology modeling and substrate binding pocket analysis provides structural insights of dNMPK Pp

To further explore the role of the dNMPK Pp protein as a TMPK enzyme from a structure perspective, homology modeling was performed using I-TASSER (69) with default settings and the amino acid sequence of dNMPK Pp as the entry query. The most closely related structural homologue identified was 1DEK (70), the crystal structure of bacteriophage T4 dNMPK bound to its substrates dGMP and ATP. The homology model obtained for dNMPK Pp had a template modeling score of 0.844, a root-mean-square deviation of atomic positions of 1.86 Å, an identity of 0.195 and a coverage of 0.903—indicating a reliable structural prediction (71). In addition, structure predictions of dNMPK Pp and 1DEK were made using AlphaFold (72), and the alignment of the resulting predicted structures (termed AF-dNMPK Pp and AF-1DEK, respectively) revealed a significant degree of conservation of structural features (Fig. S5 in the Supplemental Material). One key observation derived from this analysis is that both 1DEK and AF-dNMPK Pp consist of two domains of equal size. Domain 1 in 1DEK contains a five-stranded parallel β-sheet encircled by three α-helices, resembling the mononucleotide binding motif typical of P-loop-containing proteins (73). Notably, the amino acid residues forming and adjacent to the P-loop, a common component of many ATP-binding/processing proteins (74), are largely conserved between dNMPK Pp and 1DEK. Domain 2 is composed of five α-helices arranged in a myoglobin-like fold. Similarly, AF-dNMPK Pp features two distinct domains, with Domain 1 analogous to Domain 1 of 1DEK and Domain 2 adopting a myoglobin-like fold comprising five large and four smaller α-helices. In this configuration, the two domains are linked by a pair of loops, with one of these loops obstructing the substrate binding pocket identified in the 1DEK structure. The strong structural similarities between AF-dNMPK Pp and AF-1DEK suggest that the closed conformation of AF-dNMPK Pp might open upon substrate binding to form the active center of the enzyme. In fact, the positioning of the loop could indicate a narrower substrate tunnel in dNMPK Pp (Fig. S5 in the Supplemental Material), preventing larger purine nucleotides from entering the catalytic center.

Next, we aligned the I-TASSER-predicted homology model with the 1DEK template to further examine the substrate binding pockets of dNMPK Pp (Fig. 5A). While the domain structures and the amino acid residues forming the NTP binding sites of most nucleotide-binding enzymes are largely conserved, the (d)NMP binding sites do not require a particular chain fold and can differ significantly even for the same nucleotide substrate (73). The dNMP binding pockets of 1DEK and dNMPK Pp , however, exhibit a high degree of functional consensus and sequence identity in the predicted secondary structure alignment positions (Table 2). Interestingly, some amino acids within the dNMP binding pocket in 1DEK are replaced by bulkier residues—possibly indicating a narrower substrate spectrum for dNMPK Pp (Fig. 5B; Fig. S6 in the Supplemental Material). A case in point is Val144 in 1DEK, which is replaced by Arg164 in dNMPK Pp , a modification that reduces the binding pocket’s size and potentially enables new polar interactions with thymine. Trp152 in 1DEK, part of the hydrophobic pocket, is substituted with Lys175, likely enhancing substrate specificity by excluding bulkier purines. Gln178 in 1DEK is replaced by Tyr201 in dNMPK Pp , which could afford stacking interactions with thymidine. In contrast to the observations above, the ATP binding site appears to be largely conserved between the dNMPK enzyme of bacteriophage T4 and dNMPK Pp (Fig. S7 in the Supplemental Material). Eight out of the 10 residues known to interact with the ATP substrate in the 1DEK equivalent 1DEL, which displays ATP binding (70), are identical in dNMPK Pp . The remaining three residues show only insignificant differences. Gly225 in 1DEK, substituted by Asp248 in dNMPK Pp , interacts with ATP only via its backbone carbonyl moiety; Leu227, fostering hydrophobic interactions, is replaced by its aliphatic counterpart, Ile250.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is mbio.01081-23.f005.jpg

Structure of the dNMPK Pp protein of P. putida KT2440. The structure shown for dNMPK of P. putida KT2440 represents a homology model with dNMPK of E. coli bacteriophage T4 (1DEK). (A) Structure alignment of both dNMPK variants (i.e., bacterial and viral). The structure of 1DEK is indicated as a ribbon colored in green. The dNMPK Pp homology model is shown in a red cartoon, with the secondary structure elements (i.e., α-helixes and β-sheets) colored in cyan and magenta, respectively. The substrate dGMP, visible in the crystal structure of 1DEK, is shown as stick-model with atoms colored in red (oxygen), orange (phosphorus), blue (nitrogen) and gray (carbon and hydrogen). (B) Stereo-view of the NMP binding pocket in dNMPK Pp in complex with dGMP (front side). For a stereo-view of the back side, please refer to Fig. S6 in the Supplemental Material.

TABLE 2

Critical residues involved in forming the substrate binding pockets and their corresponding amino acids in P. putida KT2440 dNMPK Pp a

Category and domain1DEK residuedNMPK Pp residueConsensus
dNMP phosphate bindingLys37Lys38 K
Arg68Pro69.
Arg132Lys152+
Arg177Arg200 R
dNMP sugar bindingMet135Phe155h
dNMP binding pocket hydrophobic surfaceLeu32Leu33 L
Ala33Ala34 A
Ile36Leu37l
Trp152Lys175b
Thr208Ser231o
Arg177Arg200 R
dNMP binding pocket lockingAsp204Gln227p
His206His229 H
Thr208Ser231o
Glu209Glu232 E
Gln136Ala156.
Asp141Tyr161.
dNMP substrate specificity residues (base interactions)Glu181Glu204 E
Arg177Arg200 R
Asp175Asp198 D
Thr140Arg160p
ATP/phosphate bindingArg11Arg12 R
Gly13Gly14 G
Lys14Lys15 K
Asp15Asp16 D
Thr16Thr17 T
ATP base bindingArg197Arg220 R
Asn223Asn246 N
Gly225Asp248s
 (hydrophobic)Leu227Ile250l
 (hydrophobic)Leu230Leu253 L
ATP pocket stabilizationSer226Thr249o
Ser12Ser13 S
a Conserved amino acid residues: bold and uppercase letters; aliphatic residues (I, V, L): l; hydrophobic residues (W, F, Y, M, L, I, V, A, C, T, H): h; alcohol residues (S, T): o; polar residues (D, E, H, K, N, Q, R, S, T): P; tiny residues (A, G, C, S): t; small residues (A, G, C, S, V, N, D, T, P): s; bulky residues (E, F, I, K, L, M, Q, R, W, Y): b; positively charged residues (K, R, H): +; negatively charged residues (D, E): –. A dot (·) indicates that there was no functional consensus identified at the respective position.

In summary, our homology modeling and structure predictions, together with the in vivo evaluated of a role for dNMPK Pp as a TMPK enzyme, highlight significant structural similarities between dNMPK Pp and the viral deoxynucleoside monophosphate kinases 1DEK/1DEL. The substitutions observed in the dNMP binding pocket may contribute to a more restricted substrate spectrum for dNMPK Pp , while the conserved ATP binding site supports similar nucleotide-attachment and phosphate transfer mechanisms between the two proteins—underlying a potential viral origin for dNMPK Pp .

DISCUSSION

GIs, which frequently harbor functional gene clusters that convey beneficial traits to their host (75, 76), have become a target for genome streamlining strategies that aim at generating minimal-genome cell factories (77). In this sense, several studies reported genome-reduced variants of P. putida KT2440 with enhanced physiological properties (36, 78, 79). Increased plasmid stability and transformation efficiencies were observed owing to the removal of transposases, recombinases and restriction-modification systems as part of GIs and prophages (36)—resulting in enhanced performance in both synthetic biology setups (80) and metabolic engineering applications (81). In spite of its large size and potentially detrimental impact on genetic stability, the removal of the 65 kb long GI that disrupts the tmk gene of the type strain KT2440 had proven elusive so far—an occurrence suggesting that it may harbor essential functions. Building on these observations, we advanced our understanding of the essentiality and functional roles of genes encoded within the GI that disrupts the tmk gene in P. putida KT2440. Indeed, the enigma surrounding the TMPK function in this bacterium has persisted for a long time (20). Our findings open new avenues for unleashing the biotechnological potential of P. putida while serving as a prime case study to analyze and understand how horizontally-transferred genes evolve (82). We can now address the three competing hypotheses explaining the origin of the TMPK function. Our observations substantiate the view that the two tmk gene segments interrupted by the GI in strain KT2440 do not contribute independently to form a functional TMPK protein. Instead, the dNMPK gene PP_1964, encoded within the GI, plays a pivotal role in complementing the disrupted function. Conversely, our results do not support the hypothesis that another gene (previously identified as “thymidylate kinase,” PP_3363) fulfills any important role—the actual function of which is likely misannotated.

Intriguingly, the GI harboring PP_1964 is absent in the closest phylogenetic relatives of strain KT2440, indicating that this element has been acquired relatively recently. This observation, in turn, suggests that the host metabolism has accommodated the regulation and specific activity of dNMPK Pp without significant adaptation. Indeed, the high buffering capacity observed for dNMPK Pp in both P. putida and E. coli underlines a remarkable adaptability of this enzyme in different metabolic contexts. Moreover, dNMPK Pp homologs encoded in GIs disrupting the host tmk gene can be found in multiple Pseudomonas species, as well as in representatives of the Acinetobacter, Psychrobacter and Halomonas families. The GI in strain KT2440 contains several genes associated with mobile genetic elements, and its viral origin has been suggested previously (20). Further evidence supporting this notion lies in the fact that the size and functional content of these GIs are highly variable, but all genome sequences analyzed have a dNMPK function within the GIs flanked by the same four orthologs. These CDSs encode a TetR/AcrR family transcriptional regulator [which are ubiquitous in Gram-negative bacteria (83)], two tyrosine-type recombinase/integrase functions [i.e., phage integrase family (84)], and one protein of unknown activity. As indicated above, GIs are known to carry functional gene clusters that bestow beneficial traits to their host—the results of our study revealed the critical role of the dNMPK gene in establishing a GI within the conserved tmk gene locus as a “landing site” for novel biochemical functions. Notably, we identified several strains that harbor only a dNMPK homologue and no other gene annotated to encode a TMPK function. In these bacterial strains, dNMPK, placed in lieu of the tmk gene and flanked by mltG (encoding a murein lytic transglycosylase) and holB, appears to fulfill the essential TMPK function. In addition, no genes associated with mobile genetic elements are located around the dNMPK locus. These standalone dNMPK homologs might represent the result of purifying selection, leading to the expulsion of non-essential or even deleterious genes neighboring the horizontally acquired dNMPK copy and culminating in the effective deletion of the GI. This scenario is likewise supported by the observed phylogenetic relationship with viral dNMPK proteins. Alternatively, the absence of mobile genetic elements around the dNMPK locus could suggest that such variant represents an ancestral form of this enzyme. In this case, ancestral dNMPKs might have been co-opted by mobile genetic elements such as GIs or prophages, and subsequently transferred horizontally to other bacterial strains. In the recipient bacteria, the mobile genetic elements could have inserted the dNMPK gene into the tmk locus—thereby resulting in the disruption of the cognate CDS. A divergent evolutionary origin of such dNMPKs is also substantiated by phylogenetic analysis. The branch of the phylogenetic tree that contains dNMPK Pp is positioned at a considerable distance from the rest of other members, displaying a remarkable diversification within the group early in the evolutionary trajectories. The properly annotated viral dNMPKs are found in clusters dispersed across different sub-trees. This rapid diversification within the dNMPK enzyme class is consistent with an evolutionary track in mobile genetic elements and viruses, which usually have a large progeny (85). Furthermore, viruses have incorporated numerous unorthodox bases, e.g., diaminopurine, preQ0 (i.e., 7-cyano-7-deazaguanine), preQ1 (i.e., pre-queuosine 1) and 5-hydroxymethyl-dCMP (86). This biochemical occurrence necessitates the evolution of enzyme structures capable of accommodating various base types and selectively convert the substrates into the target, non-canonical products.

Restoring the tmk sequence present in other Pseudomonads closely related to P. putida KT2440 led to unsuccessful outcomes. This was a surprising result, since transcriptional regulation appears functional in these cases—the placement of holB, tmkEc or PP_1964 under these control units proved effective (Fig. 1). Importantly, P. putida SEM11 had equal growth performance when the strain was endowed with either dNMPK Pp or TMPK Ec —suggesting that either dNMPK has no secondary role or the potentially secondary (promiscuous) activity on other NMPs do not significantly impact nucleotide pools and related biochemical processes. Removal of the entire GI harboring (among other CDSs) genes encoding two recombinases, one transposase and one integrase did not alter the growth physiology of the reduced-genome P. putida SEM11 compared to its predecessor SEM10 or EM42 strains—but is expected to lead to increased genome stability (79). Improved stability is a desirable trait for biotechnological applications (36), as it results in more predictable performance and limited occurrence of undesirable mutations. Furthermore, the removal of the GI may increase fitness under stressful conditions, since strain variants derived from P. putida KT2440 where the GI had been removed showed enhanced biomass yields and growth rates. These enhanced phenotypic features align with the known benefits of genome reduction (81), as more cellular resources are freed up for biomass formation, instead of being used for the (often, detrimental) replication of accessory chromosomal DNA segments that are not necessary under standard laboratory conditions (87). Moreover, we provide evidence supporting a significant degree of resilience in the metabolism of P. putida, tolerating significant changes in dNMPK Pp abundance without compromising the overall growth parameters (Fig. 2).

From a broader perspective, the adaptation of foreign DNA sequences is an unavoidable constraint as a result of horizontal gene transfer (88)—an ubiquitous mechanism that makes up a large portion of bacterial genomes (89, 90). In some cases, foreign DNA could encode functions that are immediately adapted to their recipient hosts if the competitive advantage is significant enough. Understanding how the evolution of these sequences proceeds is a major biological question and the work presented here is a decisive step in this direction. Upon transfer into a new host, the corresponding genes will tend to be mutated in an adaptation process that combines accommodation followed by assimilation (91)—resembling the concept proposed by Jean Piaget in the context of genetic epistemology (92). Here, “accommodation” refers to the early stage of adaptation of foreign genes into a new bacterial host, while “assimilation” is the final stage of adaptation of such genes into that host. Therefore, accommodation entails a modification of the cells' organization imposed by the resistance built up against foreign structures and processes by the native elements of the recipient bacterium. Assimilation, on the other hand, consists of progressive modification of the foreign object (in this case, the foreign TMPK activity) by the processes and structures available to the cell—a scenario well-illustrated in the present study.

In conclusion, our findings not only resolve the long-standing evolutionary riddle of the TMPK function in this bacterium but also provide valuable insights for further exploration of its biotechnological potential. These efforts also constitute a first step in the exploration of the way foreign DNAs encoding novel functions adapt to their new host—a question of major importance for synthetic biology that has remained largely underexplored. As such, this study highlights the importance of understanding the role of GIs in shaping the genetic architecture and metabolic capabilities of bacteria, with potential implications for a wide range of applications in both fundamental and applied microbiology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains and culture conditions

The bacterial strains employed in this study are listed in Table 1. E. coli and P. putida cultures were routinely incubated at 37°C and 30°C, respectively. For standard cultivations, cloning procedures and genome engineering manipulations, bacteria were grown in LB medium (93), containing 10  g L−1 tryptone, 5  g L−1 yeast extract and 10  g L−1 NaCl, pH = 7.0 (94). All liquid cultures, carried out in 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks filled with 50 mL of the corresponding medium, were agitated at 250 rpm in a MaxQ 8000 incubator (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Solid culture media contained 15 g L−1 agar. To select for strains carrying resistance markers, antibiotics were added to the culture media at the following concentrations: gentamicin, 10 µg mL−1; ampicillin, 100 µg mL−1; kanamycin, 50 µg mL−1; and streptomycin, 50 µg mL−1. All growth curves shown were derived from experiments carried out in 24- or 96-well microtiter plates (as indicated in the figure captions), placed in a plate reader (ELx808, BioTek Instruments; Winooski, VT, USA). To this end, P. putida or E. coli were pre-grown overnight in the respective culture medium to be used in the main experiment, diluted 1:100 (vol/vol). The cultivations were performed in DBM medium (95) buffered with 5 g L−1 of 3-(N-morpholino)propanesulfonic acid (MOPS) at pH = 7.0 (for P. putida) or in M9 minimal medium (for E. coli), each supplemented with the carbon sources and other additives indicated in the figure captions. Tryptone medium (containing 10  g L−1 tryptone and 10  g L−1 NaCl, pH = 7.0) was used in some complementation assays. Cell growth was monitored by measuring the absorbance at 630 nm; OD600 values were estimated from these plate-reader measurements by using correlation factors previously determined under similar cultivation conditions (96).

Cloning procedures and plasmid construction

All plasmids used in this work are listed in Table 1. All genetic manipulations followed protocols previously established for Pseudomonas species (97, 98). Uracil-excision (USER) cloning (99, 100) was used for the construction of all plasmids in this work, except for pMBEC∙PP_1964, which was assembled via Golden Gate cloning (101). Oligonucleotides used to construct the plasmids and bacterial strains are listed in Table S1 in the Supplemental Material. DNA fragments employed in assembly reactions were amplified using Phusion U high-fidelity DNA polymerase (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s specifications. The identity and correctness of all plasmids and DNA constructs were confirmed by Sanger sequencing (Eurofins Genomics, Ebersberg, Germany). For genotyping experiments after cloning procedures and genome manipulations, colony PCRs were performed using the commercial OneTaq master mix (New England BioLabs, Ipswich, MA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. E. coli DH5α λpir (Table 2) was employed for cloning procedures. Chemically competent E. coli cells were prepared and transformed with plasmids according to standard protocols (94); P. putida was rendered electro-competent following the method by Choi et al. (102). The different strategies followed for allelic replacement in the GI locus are summarized in Fig. 1D. In the “stitching” approach, the tmk gene of P. putida KT2440 shared an identical sequence with 33 CDSs encoding TMPK activities in γ-proteobacteria (accessible at the NCBI website with accession number WP_020192642.1).

Mass spectrometry-aided targeted proteomics

Overnight pre-cultures of P. putida strains were grown in DBM medium supplemented with 30 mM glucose. The main cultures, consisting of 25 mL of the same medium, were prepared in 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks and inoculated with an initial OD600 of 0.05. During the mid-exponential phase (Fig. 2A), samples were collected and cells were harvested through centrifugation at 17,000 × g for 2 min at 4°C. Following supernatant removal, the cell pellets were frozen and stored at –80°C until quantitative proteomic analysis, conducted as previously described (103, 104). A protein database comprised of the P. putida reference proteome [UP000000556 (20)] was utilized to assign the detected peptides to their respective functions, along with heterologously expressed proteins. Proteomic data obtained as described above were analyzed using a customized R script within RStudio (version 2021.09.2). Initially, only entries with complete values were retained, filtering for proteins detected in every replicate of at least one condition. The abundance values were log2-transformed and normalized via variance stabilization normalization using the versatile vsn package (105). Subsequently, the dNMPK Pp abundance in the experimental strains tested was extracted from the data set and represented graphically after normalization against the protein content of P. putida strain KT2440 (104).

Phylogenetic analysis and construction of phylogenetic trees

Amino acid sequences of enzymes belonging to the group of nucleoside monophosphate kinases were extracted from Uniprot (106). Queries were used with the respective protein EC numbers and “Bacterium” or “Viruses” as taxonomy identifiers. Entries for AMPK, CMPK, GMPK, TMPK and UMPK were filtered for “reviewed” entries. A filter was applied to retain only proteins with a length between 180 and 300 amino acids; proteins with identical sequences were removed. Then, a sample of proteins for each functional class was randomly drawn as indicated in the text and in the figure captions. After this sampling, the sequences of proteins found in P. putida KT2440 were added to the data sets. A single FASTA file, containing all sampled protein sequences, was used to perform a structural alignment via Promals3D (55) using the standard settings. The alignment in FASTA format was trimmed to remove gaps not present in at least 10% of all sequences using trimAl version 1.2 (107). The phylogenetic tree was constructed with FastTree version 2.1.12 (54) using the command (FastTree.exe -quote -wag -cat 20 alignment_trimmed.fasta).

Data and statistical analysis

All experiments were performed with at least three independent biological replicates unless otherwise stated, and the mean values ± standard deviation are presented. Maximum exponential growth rates (μ max) and maximum absorbance increases (as an indication of biomass yield) were determined via linear regression on log-transformed growth data using the web-tool QurvE (108).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors are indebted to Prof. V. de Lorenzo and Dr. A. Sánchez-Pascuala (CNB-CSIC, Spain) for insightful discussions on early experiments that led to seminal observations relevant to the present study. The financial support from The Novo Nordisk Foundation through grants NNF20CC0035580, LiFe (NNF18OC0034818), and TARGET (NNF21OC0067996), and the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program under grant agreement no. 814418 (SinFonia) to P.I.N. is gratefully acknowledged.

N.T.W. and P.I.N. conceived the idea; N.T.W. executed most of the experimental plan and outlined the manuscript structure; K.R. performed molecular biology work; N.T.W. and A.D. wrote the initial draft; N.T.W., A.D., and P.I.N. contributed to writing and editing and finalized the manuscript. All authors have made direct and intellectual contributions to the editing before final submission and approved the manuscript.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest that might be perceived as affecting the objectivity of this paper.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

The following material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.01081-23.

Supplemental Information

mbio.01081-23-s0001.pdf:

Table S1 and Fig. S1 to S7.

ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.

REFERENCES
1. Nikel PI, Martínez-García E, de Lorenzo V. 2014. Biotechnological domestication of pseudomonads using synthetic biology. Nat Rev Microbiol 12:368–379. 10.1038/nrmicro3253 [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
2. Weimer A, Kohlstedt M, Volke DC, Nikel PI, Wittmann C. 2020. Industrial biotechnology of Pseudomonas putida: advances and prospects. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 104:7745–7766. 10.1007/s00253-020-10811-9 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
3. Volke DC, Calero P, Nikel PI. 2020. Pseudomonas putida. Trends Microbiol 28:512–513. 10.1016/j.tim.2020.02.015 [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
4. Dvořák P, Nikel PI, Damborský J, de Lorenzo V. 2017. Bioremediation 3.0: engineering pollutant-removing bacteria in the times of systemic biology. Biotechnol Adv 35:845–866. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2017.08.001 [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
5. Mezzina MP, Manoli MT, Prieto MA, Nikel PI. 2021. Engineering native and synthetic pathways in Pseudomonas putida for the production of tailored polyhydroxyalkanoates. Biotechnol J 16:2000165. 10.1002/biot.202000165 [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
6. Calero P, Volke DC, Lowe PT, Gotfredsen CH, O’Hagan D, Nikel PI. 2020. A fluoride-responsive genetic circuit enables in vivo biofluorination in engineered Pseudomonas putida. Nat Commun 11:5045. 10.1038/s41467-020-18813-x [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
7. Danchin A. 2009. Information of the chassis and information of the program in synthetic cells. Syst Synth Biol 3:125–134. 10.1007/s11693-009-9036-5 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
8. Danchin A. 2012. Scaling up synthetic biology: do not forget the chassis. FEBS Lett 586:2129–2137. 10.1016/j.febslet.2011.12.024 [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
9. Danchin A. 2022. In vivo, in vitro and in silico: an open space for the development of microbe-based applications of synthetic biology. Microb Biotechnol 15:42–64. 10.1111/1751-7915.13937 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
10. Danchin A, Fang G. 2016. Unknown unknowns: essential genes in quest for function. Microb Biotechnol 9:530–540. 10.1111/1751-7915.12384 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
11. Chaperon DN. 2006. Construction and complementation of in-frame deletions of the essential Escherichia coli thymidylate kinase gene. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:1288–1294. 10.1128/AEM.72.2.1288-1294.2006 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
12. Samant S, Lee H, Ghassemi M, Chen J, Cook JL, Mankin AS, Neyfakh AA. 2008. Nucleotide biosynthesis is critical for growth of bacteria in human blood. PLoS Pathog 4:e37. 10.1371/journal.ppat.0040037 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
13. Goncheva MI, Chin D, Heinrichs DE. 2022. Nucleotide biosynthesis: the base of bacterial pathogenesis. Trends Microbiol 30:793–804. 10.1016/j.tim.2021.12.007 [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
14. Keating TA, Newman JV, Olivier NB, Otterson LG, Andrews B, Boriack-Sjodin PA, Breen JN, Doig P, Dumas J, Gangl E, Green OM, Guler SY, Hentemann MF, Joseph-McCarthy D, Kawatkar S, Kutschke A, Loch JT, McKenzie AR, Pradeepan S, Prasad S, Martínez-Botella G. 2012. In vivo validation of thymidylate kinase (TMK) with a rationally designed, selective antibacterial compound. ACS Chem Biol 7:1866–1872. 10.1021/cb300316n [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
15. Cui Q, Shin WS, Luo Y, Tian J, Cui H, Yin D. 2013. Thymidylate kinase: an old topic brings new perspectives. Curr Med Chem 20:1286–1305. 10.2174/0929867311320100006 [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
16. Binkley JP, Kuempel PL. 1986. Genetic mapping in Escherichia coli of tmk, the locus for dTMP kinase. J Bacteriol 168:1457–1458. 10.1128/jb.168.3.1457-1458.1986 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
17. Jiang ZR, Abaigar LT, Huang SH, Cai B, Jong AY. 1991. Molecular characterization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae URA6 gene. DNA sequence, mutagenesis analysis, and cell cycle regulation relevant to its suppression mechanism to cdc8 mutation. J Biol Chem 266:18287–18293. 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)55267-4 [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
18. Huang SH, Tang A, Drisco B, Zhang SQ, Seeger R, Li C, Jong A. 1994. Human dTMP kinase: gene expression and enzymatic activity coinciding with cell cycle progression and cell growth. DNA Cell Biol 13:461–471. 10.1089/dna.1994.13.461 [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
19. Kanehisa M, Furumichi M, Sato Y, Kawashima M, Ishiguro-Watanabe M. 2023. KEGG for taxonomy-based analysis of pathways and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 51:D587–D592. 10.1093/nar/gkac963 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
20. Belda E, van Heck RGA, José Lopez-Sanchez M, Cruveiller S, Barbe V, Fraser C, Klenk H-P, Petersen J, Morgat A, Nikel PI, Vallenet D, Rouy Z, Sekowska A, Martins dos Santos VAP, de Lorenzo V, Danchin A, Médigue C. 2016. The revisited genome of Pseudomonas putida KT2440 enlightens its value as a robust metabolic chassis. Environ Microbiol 18:3403–3424. 10.1111/1462-2920.13230 [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
21. Winsor GL, Griffiths EJ, Lo R, Dhillon BK, Shay JA, Brinkman FSL. 2016. Enhanced annotations and features for comparing thousands of Pseudomonas genomes in the Pseudomonas genome database. Nucleic Acids Res 44:D646–D653. 10.1093/nar/gkv1227 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
22. Martínez-García E, Jatsenko T, Kivisaar M, de Lorenzo V. 2015. Freeing Pseudomonas putida KT2440 of its proviral load strengthens endurance to environmental stresses. Environ Microbiol 17:76–90. 10.1111/1462-2920.12492 [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
23. Chaperon D-N. 2006. A method for the construction of in frame substitutions in operons: deletion of the essential Escherichia coli holB gene coding for a subunit of the DNA polymerase III holoenzyme. J Microbiol Methods 65:127–134. 10.1016/j.mimet.2005.06.016 [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
24. Song M-S, Pham PT, Olson M, Carter JR, Franden MA, Schaaper RM, McHenry CS. 2001. The δ and δ' subunits of the DNA polymerase III holoenzyme are essential for initiation complex formation and processive elongation. J Biol Chem 276:35165–35175. 10.1074/jbc.M100389200 [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
25. Fernández M, Udaondo Z, Niqui J-L, Duque E, Ramos J-L. 2014. Synergic role of the two ars operons in arsenic tolerance in Pseudomonas putida KT2440. Environ Microbiol Rep 6:483–489. 10.1111/1758-2229.12167 [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
26. Páez-Espino AD, Nikel PI, Chavarría M, de Lorenzo V. 2020. ArsH protects Pseudomonas putida from oxidative damage caused by exposure to arsenic. Environ Microbiol 22:2230–2242. 10.1111/1462-2920.14991 [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
27. Weinel C, Nelson KE, Tümmler B. 2002. Global features of the Pseudomonas putida KT2440 genome sequence. Environ Microbiol 4:809–818. 10.1046/j.1462-2920.2002.00331.x [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
28. Páez-Espino AD, Durante-Rodríguez G, de Lorenzo V. 2015. Functional coexistence of twin arsenic resistance systems in Pseudomonas putida KT2440. Environ Microbiol 17:229–238. 10.1111/1462-2920.12464 [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
29. Nogales J, Mueller J, Gudmundsson S, Canalejo FJ, Duque E, Monk J, Feist AM, Ramos JL, Niu W, Palsson BO. 2020. High-quality genome-scale metabolic modelling of Pseudomonas putida highlights its broad metabolic capabilities. Environ Microbiol 22:255–269. 10.1111/1462-2920.14843 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
30. Leprince A, de Lorenzo V, Völler P, van Passel MWJ, Martins dos Santos VAP. 2012. Random and cyclical deletion of large DNA segments in the genome of Pseudomonas putida. Environ Microbiol 14:1444–1453. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2012.02730.x [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
31. Platt R, Drescher C, Park SK, Phillips GJ. 2000. Genetic system for reversible integration of DNA constructs and lacZ gene fusions into the Escherichia coli chromosome. Plasmid 43:12–23. 10.1006/plas.1999.1433 [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
32. Jensen KF. 1993. The Escherichia coli K-12 "wild types" W3110 and MG1655 have an rph frameshift mutation that leads to pyrimidine starvation due to low pyrE expression levels. J Bacteriol 175:3401–3407. 10.1128/jb.175.11.3401-3407.1993 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
33. Russell JH, Ostermeier M. 2014. The thymidylate kinase genes from Mycobacterium tuberculosis and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus confer 3'-azido-3'-deoxythymidine resistance to Escherichia coli. FEMS Microbiol Lett 361:158–165. 10.1111/1574-6968.12627 [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
34. Worsey MJ, Williams PA. 1975. Metabolism of toluene and xylenes by Pseudomonas putida (arvilla) mt-2: evidence for a new function of the TOL plasmid. J Bacteriol 124:7–13. 10.1128/jb.124.1.7-13.1975 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
35. Bagdasarian M, Lurz R, Rückert B, Franklin FC, Bagdasarian MM, Frey J, Timmis KN. 1981. Specific purpose plasmid cloning vectors. II. Broad host range, high copy number, RSF1010-derived vectors, and a host-vector system for gene cloning in Pseudomonas. Gene 16:237–247. 10.1016/0378-1119(81)90080-9 [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
36. Martínez-García E, Nikel PI, Aparicio T, de Lorenzo V. 2014. Pseudomonas 2.0: genetic upgrading of P. putida KT2440 as an enhanced host for heterologous gene expression. Microb Cell Fact 13:159. 10.1186/s12934-014-0159-3 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
37. Volke DC, Friis L, Wirth NT, Turlin J, Nikel PI. 2020. Synthetic control of plasmid replication enables target- and self-curing of vectors and expedites genome engineering of Pseudomonas putida. Metab Eng Commun 10:e00126. 10.1016/j.mec.2020.e00126 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
38. Wirth NT, Kozaeva E, Nikel PI. 2020. Accelerated genome engineering of Pseudomonas putida by I-SceI―mediated recombination and CRISPR-Cas9 counterselection. Microb Biotechnol 13:233–249. 10.1111/1751-7915.13396 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
39. Amarelle V, Sanches-Medeiros A, Silva-Rocha R, Guazzaroni M-E. 2019. Expanding the toolbox of broad host-range transcriptional terminators for Proteobacteria through metagenomics. ACS Synth Biol 8:647–654. 10.1021/acssynbio.8b00507 [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
40. Volke DC, Martino RA, Kozaeva E, Smania AM, Nikel PI. 2022. Modular (de)construction of complex bacterial phenotypes by CRISPR/nCas9-assisted, multiplex cytidine base-editing. Nat Commun 13:3026. 10.1038/s41467-022-30780-z [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
41. Rose RE. 1988. The nucleotide sequence of pACYC184. Nucleic Acids Res 16:355. 10.1093/nar/16.1.355 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
42. Martínez-García E, Fraile S, Algar E, Aparicio T, Velázquez E, Calles B, Tas H, Blázquez B, Martín B, Prieto C, Sánchez-Sampedro L, Nørholm MHH, Volke DC, Wirth NT, Dvořák P, Alejaldre L, Grozinger L, Crowther M, Goñi-Moreno A, Nikel PI, Nogales J, de Lorenzo V. 2023. SEVA 4.0: an update of the Standard European Vector Architecture database for advanced analysis and programming of bacterial phenotypes. Nucleic Acids Res 51:D1558–D1567. 10.1093/nar/gkac1059 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
43. Silva-Rocha R, Martínez-García E, Calles B, Chavarría M, Arce-Rodríguez A, de Las Heras A, Páez-Espino AD, Durante-Rodríguez G, Kim J, Nikel PI, Platero R, de Lorenzo V. 2013. The Standard European Vector Architecture (SEVA): a coherent platform for the analysis and deployment of complex prokaryotic phenotypes. Nucleic Acids Res 41:D666–D675. 10.1093/nar/gks1119 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
44. Gawin A, Valla S, Brautaset T. 2017. The XylS/Pm regulator/promoter system and its use in fundamental studies of bacterial gene expression, recombinant protein production and metabolic engineering. Microb Biotechnol 10:702–718. 10.1111/1751-7915.12701 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
45. Nikel PI, Benedetti I, Wirth NT, de Lorenzo V, Calles B. 2022. Standardization of regulatory nodes for engineering heterologous gene expression: a feasibility study. Microb Biotechnol 15:2250–2265. 10.1111/1751-7915.14063 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
46. Wirth NT, Nikel PI. 2021. Combinatorial pathway balancing provides biosynthetic access to 2-fluoro-cis,cis-muconate in engineered Pseudomonas putida. Chem Catalysis 1:1234–1259. 10.1016/j.checat.2021.09.002 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
47. Calero P, Jensen SI, Nielsen AT. 2016. Broad-host-range ProUSER vectors enable fast characterization of inducible promoters and optimization of p-coumaric acid production in Pseudomonas putida KT2440. ACS Synth Biol 5:741–753. 10.1021/acssynbio.6b00081 [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
48. Volke DC, Turlin J, Mol V, Nikel PI. 2020. Physical decoupling of XylS/Pm regulatory elements and conditional proteolysis enable precise control of gene expression in Pseudomonas putida. Microb Biotechnol 13:222–232. 10.1111/1751-7915.13383 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
49. Cowles CE, Nichols NN, Harwood CS. 2000. BenR, a XylS homologue, regulates three different pathways of aromatic acid degradation in Pseudomonas putida. J Bacteriol 182:6339–6346. 10.1128/JB.182.22.6339-6346.2000 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
50. Cuskey SM, Sprenkle AB. 1988. Benzoate-dependent induction from the OP2 operator-promoter region of the TOL plasmid pWWO in the absence of known plasmid regulatory genes. J Bacteriol 170:3742–3746. 10.1128/jb.170.8.3742-3746.1988 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
51. Jeffrey WH, Cuskey SM, Chapman PJ, Resnick S, Olsen RH. 1992. Characterization of Pseudomonas putida mutants unable to catabolize benzoate: cloning and characterization of Pseudomonas genes involved in benzoate catabolism and isolation of a chromosomal DNA fragment able to substitute for xylS in activation of the TOL lower-pathway promoter. J Bacteriol 174:4986–4996. 10.1128/jb.174.15.4986-4996.1992 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
52. Rosconi F, Rudmann E, Li J, Surujon D, Anthony J, Frank M, Jones DS, Rock C, Rosch JW, Johnston CD, van Opijnen T. 2022. A bacterial pan-genome makes gene essentiality strain-dependent and evolvable. Nat Microbiol 7:1580–1592. 10.1038/s41564-022-01208-7 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
53. Cetnar DP, Salis HM. 2021. Systematic quantification of sequence and structural determinants controlling mRNA stability in bacterial operons. ACS Synth Biol 10:318–332. 10.1021/acssynbio.0c00471 [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
54. Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP. 2010. FastTree 2—Approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS One 5:e9490. 10.1371/journal.pone.0009490 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
55. Pei J, Grishin NV. 2014. PROMALS3D: multiple protein sequence alignment enhanced with evolutionary and three-dimensional structural information. Methods Mol Biol 1079:263–271. 10.1007/978-1-62703-646-7_17 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
56. Leipe DD, Koonin EV, Aravind L. 2003. Evolution and classification of P-loop kinases and related proteins. J Mol Biol 333:781–815. 10.1016/j.jmb.2003.08.040 [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
57. Finer-Moore JS, Maley GF, Maley F, Montfort WR, Stroud RM. 1994. Crystal structure of thymidylate synthase from T4 phage: component of a deoxynucleoside triphosphate-synthesizing complex. Biochemistry 33:15459–15468. 10.1021/bi00255a028 [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
58. Hazebrouck S, Maley F, Machtelinckx V, Sonigo P, Kupiec JJ. 1999. Structural and functional analysis of surface domains unique to bacteriophage T4 thymidylate synthase. Biochemistry 38:2094–2101. 10.1021/bi981313y [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
59. Liu K, Myers AR, Pisithkul T, Claas KR, Satyshur KA, Amador-Noguez D, Keck JL, Wang JD. 2015. Molecular mechanism and evolution of guanylate kinase regulation by (p)ppGpp. Mol Cell 57:735–749. 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.12.037 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
60. Bapteste E, Papale F. 2021. Modeling the evolution of interconnected processes: it is the song and the singers—tracking units of selection with interaction networks. Bioessays 43:e2000077. 10.1002/bies.202000077 [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
61. Serina L, Blondin C, Krin E, Sismeiro O, Danchin A, Sakamoto H, Gilles AM, Bârzu O. 1995. Escherichia coli UMP-kinase, a member of the aspartokinase family, is a hexamer regulated by guanine nucleotides and UTP. Biochemistry 34:5066–5074. 10.1021/bi00015a018 [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
62. Bucurenci N, Sakamoto H, Briozzo P, Palibroda N, Serina L, Sarfati RS, Labesse G, Briand G, Danchin A, Bărzu O, Gilles AM. 1996. CMP kinase from Escherichia coli is structurally related to other nucleoside monophosphate kinases. J Biol Chem 271:2856–2862. 10.1074/jbc.271.5.2856 [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
63. Briozzo P, Golinelli-Pimpaneau B, Gilles AM, Gaucher JF, Burlacu-Miron S, Sakamoto H, Janin J, Bârzu O. 1998. Structures of Escherichia coli CMP kinase alone and in complex with CDP: a new fold of the nucleoside monophosphate binding domain and insights into cytosine nucleotide specificity. Structure 6:1517–1527. 10.1016/s0969-2126(98)00150-6 [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
64. Flanegan JB, Greenberg GR. 1977. Regulation of deoxyribonucleotide biosynthesis during in vivo bacteriophage T4 DNA replication. Intrinsic control of synthesis of thymine and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine deoxyribonucleotides at precise ratio found in DNA. J Biol Chem 252:3019–3027. 10.1016/S0021-9258(17)40466-2 [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
65. Mikoulinskaia GV, Gubanov SI, Zimin AA, Kolesnikov IV, Feofanov SA, Miroshnikov AI. 2003. Purification and characterization of the deoxynucleoside monophosphate kinase of bacteriophage T5. Protein Expr Purif 27:195–201. 10.1016/s1046-5928(02)00603-4 [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
66. Ladunga I. 2017. Finding similar nucleotide sequences using network BLAST searches. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics 58:3. 10.1002/cpbi.29 [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
67. La Rosa R, Johansen HK, Molin S, Miller SI. 2018. Convergent metabolic specialization through distinct evolutionary paths in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. mBio 9:e00269-18. 10.1128/mBio.00269-18 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
68. Bolotin E, Hershberg R. 2015. Gene loss dominates as a source of genetic variation within clonal pathogenic bacterial species. Genome Biol Evol 7:2173–2187. 10.1093/gbe/evv135 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
69. Roy A, Kucukural A, Zhang Y. 2010. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nat Protoc 5:725–738. 10.1038/nprot.2010.5 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
70. Teplyakov A, Sebastiao P, Obmolova G, Perrakis A, Brush GS, Bessman MJ, Wilson KS. 1996. Crystal structure of bacteriophage T4 deoxynucleotide kinase with its substrates dGMP and ATP. EMBO J 15:3487–3497. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
71. Zheng W, Zhang C, Bell EW, Zhang Y. 2019. I-TASSER gateway: a protein structure and function prediction server powered by XSEDE. Fut Gener Comput Syst 99:73–85. 10.1016/j.future.2019.04.011 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
72. Jumper J, Evans R, Pritzel A, Green T, Figurnov M, Ronneberger O, Tunyasuvunakool K, Bates R, Žídek A, Potapenko A, Bridgland A, Meyer C, Kohl SAA, Ballard AJ, Cowie A, Romera-Paredes B, Nikolov S, Jain R, Adler J, Back T, Petersen S, Reiman D, Clancy E, Zielinski M, Steinegger M, Pacholska M, Berghammer T, Bodenstein S, Silver D, Vinyals O, Senior AW, Kavukcuoglu K, Kohli P, Hassabis D. 2021. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596:583–589. 10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
73. Schulz GE. 1992. Binding of nucleotides by proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2:61–67. 10.1016/0959-440X(92)90178-A [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
74. Saraste M, Sibbald PR, Wittinghofer A. 1990. The P-loop—A common motif in ATP- and GTP-binding proteins. Trends Biochem Sci 15:430–434. 10.1016/0968-0004(90)90281-f [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
75. Battle SE, Rello J, Hauser AR. 2009. Genomic islands of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. FEMS Microbiol Lett 290:70–78. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2008.01406.x [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
76. Dobrindt U, Hochhut B, Hentschel U, Hacker J. 2004. Genomic islands in pathogenic and environmental microorganisms. Nat Rev Microbiol 2:414–424. 10.1038/nrmicro884 [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
77. Lachance J-C, Rodrigue S, Palsson BO. 2019. Minimal cells, maximal knowledge. eLife 8:e45379. 10.7554/eLife.45379 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
78. Martínez-García E, Nikel PI, Chavarría M, de Lorenzo V. 2014. The metabolic cost of flagellar motion in Pseudomonas putida KT2440. Environ Microbiol 16:291–303. 10.1111/1462-2920.12309 [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
79. Liang P, Zhang Y, Xu B, Zhao Y, Liu X, Gao W, Ma T, Yang C, Wang S, Liu R. 2020. Deletion of genomic islands in the Pseudomonas putida KT2440 genome can create an optimal chassis for synthetic biology applications. Microb Cell Fact 19:70. 10.1186/s12934-020-01329-w [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
80. Aparicio T, de Lorenzo V, Martínez-García E. 2019. Improved thermotolerance of genome-reduced Pseudomonas putida EM42 enables effective functioning of the PL/cI857 system. Biotechnol J 14:e1800483. 10.1002/biot.201800483 [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
81. Lieder S, Nikel PI, de Lorenzo V, Takors R. 2015. Genome reduction boosts heterologous gene expression in Pseudomonas putida. Microb Cell Fact 14:23. 10.1186/s12934-015-0207-7 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
82. Boto L. 2010. Horizontal gene transfer in evolution: facts and challenges. Proc R Soc B 277:819–827. 10.1098/rspb.2009.1679 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
83. Colclough AL, Scadden J, Blair JMA. 2019. TetR-family transcription factors in Gram-negative bacteria: conservation, variation and implications for efflux-mediated antimicrobial resistance. BMC Genomics 20:731. 10.1186/s12864-019-6075-5 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
84. Esposito D, Scocca JJ. 1997. The integrase family of tyrosine recombinases: evolution of a conserved active site domain. Nucleic Acids Res 25:3605–3614. 10.1093/nar/25.18.3605 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
85. Pond SLK, Murrell B, Poon AFY. 2012. Evolution of viral genomes: interplay between selection, recombination, and other forces. Methods Mol Biol 856:239–272. 10.1007/978-1-61779-585-5_10 [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
86. Eremeeva E, Herdewijn P. 2019. Non canonical genetic material. Curr Opin Biotechnol 60:259–267. 10.1016/j.copbio.2019.11.009 [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
87. LeBlanc N, Charles TC. 2022. Bacterial genome reductions: tools, applications, and challenges. Front Genome Ed 4:957289. 10.3389/fgeed.2022.957289 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
88. Juhas M, van der Meer JR, Gaillard M, Harding RM, Hood DW, Crook DW. 2009. Genomic islands: tools of bacterial horizontal gene transfer and evolution. FEMS Microbiol Rev 33:376–393. 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00136.x [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
89. Médigue C, Rouxel T, Vigier P, Hénaut A, Danchin A. 1991. Evidence for horizontal gene transfer in Escherichia coli speciation. J Mol Biol 222:851–856. 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90575-q [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
90. Hacker J, Carniel E. 2001. Ecological fitness, genomic islands and bacterial pathogenicity. A darwinian view of the evolution of microbes. EMBO Rep 2:376–381. 10.1093/embo-reports/kve097 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
91. Moura de Sousa J, Lourenço M, Gordo I. 2023. Horizontal gene transfer among host-associated microbes. Cell Host Microbe 31:513–527. 10.1016/j.chom.2023.03.017 [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
92. Block J. 1982. Assimilation, accommodation, and the dynamics of personality development. Child Develop 53:281. 10.2307/1128971 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
93. Nikel PI, Pettinari MJ, Ramírez MC, Galvagno MA, Méndez BS. 2008. Escherichia coli arcA mutants: metabolic profile characterization of microaerobic cultures using glycerol as a carbon source. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol 15:48–54. 10.1159/000111992 [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
94. Sambrook J, Russell DW. 2001. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. 3rd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor. [Google Scholar]
95. Hartmans S, Smits JP, van der Werf MJ, Volkering F, de Bont JA. 1989. Metabolism of styrene oxide and 2-phenylethanol in the styrene-degrading Xanthobacter strain 124X. Appl Environ Microbiol 55:2850–2855. 10.1128/aem.55.11.2850-2855.1989 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
96. Volke DC, Olavarría K, Nikel PI. 2021. Cofactor specificity of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase isozymes in Pseudomonas putida reveals a general principle underlying glycolytic strategies in bacteria. mSystems 6:e00014-21. 10.1128/mSystems.00014-21 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
97. Wirth NT, Gurdo N, Krink N, Vidal-Verdú À, Donati S, Férnandez-Cabezón L, Wulff T, Nikel PI. 2022. A synthetic C2 auxotroph of Pseudomonas putida for evolutionary engineering of alternative sugar catabolic routes. Metab Eng 74:83–97. 10.1016/j.ymben.2022.09.004 [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
98. Batianis C, Kozaeva E, Damalas SG, Martín-Pascual M, Volke DC, Nikel PI, Martins dos Santos VAP. 2020. An expanded CRISPRi toolbox for tunable control of gene expression in Pseudomonas putida. Microb Biotechnol 13:368–385. 10.1111/1751-7915.13533 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
99. Cavaleiro AM, Kim SH, Seppälä S, Nielsen MT, Nørholm MHH. 2015. Accurate DNA assembly and genome engineering with optimized uracil excision cloning. ACS Synth Biol 4:1042–1046. 10.1021/acssynbio.5b00113 [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
100. Kozaeva E, Volkova S, Matos MRA, Mezzina MP, Wulff T, Volke DC, Nielsen LK, Nikel PI. 2021. Model-guided dynamic control of essential metabolic nodes boosts acetyl-coenzyme A–dependent bioproduction in rewired Pseudomonas putida. Metab Eng 67:373–386. 10.1016/j.ymben.2021.07.014 [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
101. Pryor JM, Potapov V, Kucera RB, Bilotti K, Cantor EJ, Lohman GJS. 2020. Enabling one-pot golden gate assemblies of unprecedented complexity using data-optimized assembly design. PLoS One 15:e0238592. 10.1371/journal.pone.0238592 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
102. Choi KH, Kumar A, Schweizer HP. 2006. A 10-min method for preparation of highly electrocompetent Pseudomonas aeruginosa cells: application for DNA fragment transfer between chromosomes and plasmid transformation. J Microbiol Methods 64:391–397. 10.1016/j.mimet.2005.06.001 [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
103. Fernández-Cabezón L, Rosich I Bosch B, Kozaeva E, Gurdo N, Nikel PI. 2022. Dynamic flux regulation for high-titer anthranilate production by plasmid-free, conditionally-auxotrophic strains of Pseudomonas putida. Metab Eng 73:11–25. 10.1016/j.ymben.2022.05.008 [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
104. Gurdo N, Taylor Parkins SK, Fricano M, Wulff T, Nielsen LK, Nikel PI. 2023. Protocol for absolute quantification of proteins in Gram-negative bacteria based on QconCAT-based labeled peptides. STAR Protoc 4:102060. 10.1016/j.xpro.2023.102060 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
105. Huber W, von Heydebreck A, Sültmann H, Poustka A, Vingron M. 2002. Variance stabilization applied to microarray data calibration and to the quantification of differential expression. Bioinformatics 18 Suppl 1:S96–104. 10.1093/bioinformatics/18.suppl_1.s96 [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
106. The_UniProt_consortium . 2015. UniProt: a hub for protein information. Nucleic Acids Res 43:D204–D212. 10.1093/nar/gku989 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
107. Capella-Gutiérrez S, Silla-Martínez JM, Gabaldón T. 2009. trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 25:1972–1973. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp348 [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
108. Wirth NT, Funk J, Donati S, Nikel PI. 2023. QurvE: user-friendly software for the analysis of biological growth and fluorescence data. Nat Protoc 18:2401–2403. 10.1038/s41596-023-00850-7 [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Articles from mBio are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

Citations & impact 


Impact metrics

Jump to Citations

Alternative metrics

Altmetric item for https://www.altmetric.com/details/154469965
Altmetric
Discover the attention surrounding your research
https://www.altmetric.com/details/154469965

Article citations

Data 


Data behind the article

This data has been text mined from the article, or deposited into data resources.

Similar Articles 


To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.

Funding 


Funders who supported this work.

EC | H2020 | IL | LEIT | H2020 LEIT Biotechnology (BIOTEC) (1)

NNF Center for Biosustainability (1)

Novo Nordisk Fonden (1)

Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF) (3)