Abstract
Objective
Examine overall level of and variation in local health department (LHD) use and perceived impact of the County Health Rankings report (Rankings) in Florida (2010, 2011) and North Carolina (2010-2012, 2013).Design
Two cross-sectional surveys among LHDs.Participants
Local health directors and relevant staff.Main outcome measures
Use of the Rankings was measured by asking respondents if their LHD had used the Rankings in any of 10 ways and through assessment of community engagement. Perceived impact was measured by amount of attention the Rankings received from various stakeholders and whether they had already produced or would likely produce any of 7 possible results.Results
Overall, LHDs used the Rankings most often to educate staff in Florida (78%) and North Carolina (56%). Engagement with community groups around the Rankings was variable. Media engagement, through press releases (41%; 40%) or interviews (51%; 36%) in Florida and North Carolina, was moderate. Florida LHDs used the Rankings in more ways and significantly more frequently than North Carolina LHDs. There were few significant differences in perceived impact by state. At least a moderate amount of attention was received from media in Florida (52%) and North Carolina (46%). Twenty-percent of LHDs reported the Rankings received at least moderate attention from the general public in both states and 38% (Florida) and 33% (North Carolina) from policy makers. Tangible benefits to communities from the Rankings, such as having already influenced adoption of new policies, were modest in Florida (3%) and North Carolina (11%).Conclusions
Results suggest that tangible benefits to communities from use of the Rankings have yet to be fully realized but are encouraging. More effective media engagement could produce the community awareness necessary to maximize the Rankings' potential to mobilize communities for health improvement. State variation in Rankings use suggests that more support to LHDs may be helpful.References
Articles referenced by this article (17)
Population health rankings as policy indicators and performance measures.
Prev Chronic Dis, (5):A101 2010
MED: 20712928
Ranking community health status to stimulate discussion of local public health issues: the Wisconsin County Health Rankings.
Am J Public Health, (2):209-212 2008
MED: 18172156
Measuring the health of communities--how and why?
J Public Health Manag Pract, (5):397-400 2011
MED: 21788775
Using the Wisconsin County Health Rankings to catalyze community health improvement.
J Public Health Manag Pract, (1):24-32 2009
MED: 19077591
An initial attempt at ranking population health outcomes and determinants.
WMJ, (3):52-56 2004
MED: 15217115
Observations and recommendations from the Mobilizing Action Toward Community Health (MATCH) expert meeting.
Prev Chronic Dis, (6):A124 2010
MED: 20950531
State legislators' work on public health-related issues: what influences priorities?
J Public Health Manag Pract, (1):25-29 2013
MED: 23169400
Show 7 more references (10 of 17)
Citations & impact
Impact metrics
Article citations
Measuring Subcounty Differences in Population Health Using Hospital and Census-Derived Data Sets: The Missouri ZIP Health Rankings Project.
J Public Health Manag Pract, 24(4):340-349, 01 Jul 2018
Cited by: 11 articles | PMID: 28492449 | PMCID: PMC5704978
Uses of Population Health Rankings in Local Policy Contexts: A Multisite Case Study.
Med Care Res Rev, 76(4):478-496, 17 Aug 2017
Cited by: 3 articles | PMID: 29148353
Similar Articles
To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.
Local surveillance practice evaluation in North Carolina and value of new national accreditation measures.
J Public Health Manag Pract, 19(2):146-152, 01 Mar 2013
Cited by: 4 articles | PMID: 23358293
Public Health Agency Accreditation Among Rural Local Health Departments: Influencers and Barriers.
J Public Health Manag Pract, 24(1):49-56, 01 Jan 2018
Cited by: 6 articles | PMID: 28079646
Rurality, Quality Improvement Maturity, and Accreditation Readiness: A Comparison Study of Colorado, Kansas, and Nebraska Local Health Departments.
J Public Health Manag Pract, 24(6):E15-E22, 01 Nov 2018
Cited by: 1 article | PMID: 29227416
Assurance opportunities for local health departments.
Am J Prev Med, 16(3 suppl):128-133, 01 Apr 1999
Cited by: 2 articles | PMID: 10198689
Review