Abstract
Purpose
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been shown to modify the perception threshold of phosphenes elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). The current study was undertaken to examine whether tDCS, when applied over the occipital cortex, is also able to affect visual-evoked potentials (VEPs), which characterize occipital activation in response to visual stimulation, in a polarity-specific way.Method
For this purpose, VEPs evoked by sinusoidal luminance grating in an on/off mode were recorded before, immediately after, and 10, 20, and 30 minutes after the end of 5, 10, or 15 minutes of anodal or cathodal tDCS of the primary visual cortex.Results
Significant effects were observed only when low-contrast visual stimuli were applied. Cathodal stimulation decreased, whereas anodal stimulation increased the amplitude of the N70 component. The effect of cathodal stimulation was significant immediately after and 10 minutes after the end of stimulation, if the stimulation duration was sufficiently long (i.e., 10-15 minutes). An increase of N70 amplitude by anodal stimulation was significant only 10 minutes after the end of the 15 minutes tDCS. Cathodal stimulation tended also to affect the amplitude of the P100 component; however, the effect of stimulation was inverse. The amplitude increased immediately after the end of cathodal stimulation. In contrast, anodal stimulation did not affect the P100. The latencies of the N70 and the P100 were not affected by tDCS.Conclusions
tDCS appears to be a suitable method of inducing reversible excitability changes in a polarity-specific way, not only in the motor but also in the primary visual cortex. The duration of the induced aftereffects depends not only on stimulation duration but also on stimulation polarity. Cathodal stimulation seems to be more effective, in line with previous reports on the motor cortex.Citations & impact
Impact metrics
Article citations
Aligning Event-Related Potentials with Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation for Modulation-a Review.
Brain Topogr, 37(6):933-946, 30 Apr 2024
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 38689065 | PMCID: PMC11408541
Review Free full text in Europe PMC
The effects of occipital and parietal tDCS on chronic visual field defects after brain injury.
Front Neurol, 15:1340365, 14 Feb 2024
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 38419713 | PMCID: PMC10899507
The effect of bipolar bihemispheric tDCS on executive function and working memory abilities.
Front Psychol, 14:1275878, 03 Jan 2024
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 38235279 | PMCID: PMC10791995
The effect of montages of transcranial alternating current stimulation on occipital responses-a sham-controlled pilot study.
Front Psychiatry, 14:1273044, 24 Jan 2024
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 38328519 | PMCID: PMC10849049
Optimizing electrode placement for transcranial direct current stimulation in nonsuperficial cortical regions: a computational modeling study.
Biomed Eng Lett, 14(2):255-265, 23 Nov 2023
Cited by: 1 article | PMID: 38374912
Go to all (201) article citations
Similar Articles
To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.
Oscillatory brain activity and transcranial direct current stimulation in humans.
Neuroreport, 15(8):1307-1310, 01 Jun 2004
Cited by: 56 articles | PMID: 15167555
Visual evoked potentials modulation during direct current cortical polarization.
Exp Brain Res, 178(2):261-266, 19 Oct 2006
Cited by: 102 articles | PMID: 17051377
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Effects on Single and Paired Flash Visual Evoked Potentials.
Clin EEG Neurosci, 46(3):208-213, 23 Sep 2014
Cited by: 7 articles | PMID: 25253432
Can visual cortex non-invasive brain stimulation improve normal visual function? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Front Neurosci, 17:1119200, 02 Mar 2023
Cited by: 6 articles | PMID: 36937668 | PMCID: PMC10017867
Review Free full text in Europe PMC