S0091

 

:Hi 16912 Rhiannon, I honestly do not see a path forward without an article about the agency so I strongly suggest creating that first. Otherwise his claim to notability (under Wikipedia's definition) is largely something that is yet to be deemed notable (meaning no Wikipedia article). For the above referenced articles, disregard anything he says, is attributed to him/his associates or about the agency then see what is left that is ''about him'' to determine what is actually useful. As for Bond, you are right, that is not the article being reviewed and [[WP:OTHERSTUFF|other articles exist]] even when maybe they should not (Wikipedia has over six million articles with likely at least hundreds of thousands that should not exist). Wikipedia's standards have become largely more stringent over the years so an article acceptable a decade ago is no longer acceptable (the article about Bond was created in 2013 and perhaps the previous article about Kirshenbaum). I will be honest, because the article about Kirshenbaum just recently went through [[WP:Articles for deletion/Richard Kirshenbaum|a deletion discussion]] where the [[WP:consensus|consensus]] of the Wikipedia community was it should be deleted and because you are a paid editor, the scrutiny is more intense. [[User:S0091|S0091]] ([[User talk:S0091#top|talk]]) 22:28, 17 October 2022 (UTC)