Content deleted Content added
Line 79:
:Another point worth noting is that the article you posted made several potentially defamatory statements about living persons. To avoid causing harm to living individuals and for legal reasons, an article should never contain unsourced negative claims about [[WP:BLP|living people]].
:In summary, to obviate future deletions of the article, you should first ensure that the group ''currently'' meets the guideline for inclusion (notability), and start out with a smaller article with sourced content. After that you can start worrying about less important details such as formatting and images. Let me know if you have further questions or need help determining if the group's notable. Regards, <code>[[User:Decltype|decltype]]</code> <small>([[User:Decltype/contact|contact]])</small> 07:18, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
Thank You very much. I had expected such editorial. I knew I was riding a line between narrative and encyclopedia. It is simply a case of the story being what is so compelling that I had to tell it (and still will). Although, I do understand. The group's most notable achievements are undoubtedly still to come, and while the story, which you were nice enough to compliment, is one that has already begun to make waves and will be instrumental in the success of their biggest album this spring, in a historical account of their existence, that story should be one paragraph. I can definitely see that.
Thank you for your help. I will certainly tighten the screws this time around.
[[User:Profplume|Profplume]] ([[User talk:Profplume|talk]]) 02:38, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
| |||