Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
Line 137:
::Oppose whitewashing, and requesting reversion. Also, requesting user is a new account, who's only edit is on this page. I suspect a sock account of an editor from a few weeks ago.--[[User:L1A1 FAL|L1A1 FAL]] ([[User talk:L1A1 FAL|talk]]) 22:08, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
:::You ''get'' that the content is ''still'' in the article right? One line of content was removed because it didn't belong in the opening paragraph in a way that implied that was entirely what the movie is about when the source is from 20 years after the film was released. The user was absolutely right to point out it's very broad and undue prominence in the opening paragraph. [[User: Darkwarriorblake|Darkwarriorblake]] / [[User talk:Darkwarriorblake|SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE!]] 22:13, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
::::The authors address why they are talking about it 20 years after the film was released, and not back then. I definitely think the line could use improvements or clarification, but maybe not necessarily removal. This could use more opinions before deletion. But most importantly, as far as I can tell, the request comes from ''misunderstanding'' what the creators said (i.e. thinking the allegory ''only'' refers to Switch, I did not find any quote that would support this claim). [[User:Ynneblack|Ynneblack]] ([[User talk:Ynneblack|talk]]) 22:24, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
| |||