Talk:Singapore Premier League
 | Singapore Premier League is currently a Sports and recreation good article nominee. Nominated by Icedwater (talk) at 10:59, 5 February 2015 (UTC) Anyone who has not contributed significantly to (or nominated) this article may review it according to the good article criteria to decide whether or not to list it as a good article. To start the review process, click start review and save the page. (See here for the good article instructions.)
|
 | Football C‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
Can I suggest that we only include S-League records for this page, and keep the FAS Premier League records and other previous era records into the relevant pages that already exist?Frankie goh (talk) 12:30, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
At the moment, the only other relevant page is for the FAS Premier League (which was a very specific and short era). I think it's good to have a page that lists the full history of league football in Singapore. The historical information is at the bottom of the page and does not interfere with the information about the S.League. 13:47, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
- Well, why not add a page for the full Singapore football history so that the S.League page can have information only about the S.League, as it should be? Also, we could clean up the Trivia section at some point. Icedwater (talk) 04:06, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
Top 10 in Asia
The top 10 in Asia statement written on this page - although quite clearly sourced, isn't actually correct. If you view this link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asian_Football_Confederation#AFC_Countries_Members_National_League_Ranking you will notice that they come 11th. So should this statement be deleted? Or should it be re-written to state that it was Graded C in 2008 which enabled one club to enter the AFC Champions League qualifying rounds. Grading of course will happen again in the future - so this article could be updated on a yearly basis
- I think the statement should probably be removed. Singopo (talk) 21:33, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
- Just say they are now ranked 11th in Asia. 121.7.193.170 (talk) 22:49, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
S.League Season pages
I understand that discussing on the individual season articles talkpages will be more appropriate but instead of duplicating efforts and to garner a consensus, I thought it will be better to ask/discuss here.
2010 S.League and etc has all the results by week as a section each. This has lead to a bloated Topic List and quite unwieldy. I suggest to remove them as subsections and just bold each week, similar to a section header. It shrinks the topic list by a lot, making the article more easier to navigate.
Any suggestions? Thanks~! Xaiver0510 (talk) 05:30, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
- Should definately be done. Or even removed. -Koppapa (talk) 15:28, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
- I agree, should be done or removed, put into a results gid which will be a lot of work mind! Need to find a set standard fr every season article aswell. Druryfire (talk) 17:17, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
Foreign clubs
With all the infobox editwar going on, there actually is not a sentence explaining the flags before the clubs. Why do foreign clubs play in the league? Are all players Brunei nationals there for example? Anyone with info please add some text somewhere.-Koppapa (talk) 23:11, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
Not ready for GA nomination
@Icedwater: The History section is decent, but the rest of the article is a huge collection of statistics. To achieve GA status, the article needs some information about governance, finances and media coverage. See the Premier League and Major League Soccer articles for ideas, though of course, I do not expect that level of thoroughness. Please do not be discouraged, for I do appreciate the work that has been put into this article and look forward to seeing further improvements. --Hildanknight (talk) 13:17, 6 February 2015 (UTC)