Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Talk:Scientology: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Spidern (talk | contribs)
Spidern (talk | contribs)
Line 161:
::::I believe that the [[Australia]] example is misleading and can't be compared. Australia has over 400 years of recorded history, Scientoloy has about 60, and both are covered in almost the same detail. Also, you will find that the article could be improved with what I suggest. Both the CoS and it's detractors brought mayhem upon Scientology-related articles, and the mess has to be fixed. [[User:RUL3R|RUL3R]] ([[User talk:RUL3R|talk]]) 16:09, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
::::'''Expanding comment.''' Perhaphs I am wrong to just delete it. But I am not suggesting to ''remove'' information. I am suggesting to ''order'' information. [[User:RUL3R|RUL3R]] ([[User talk:RUL3R|talk]]) 16:23, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
:::::How about conforming to [[WP:SS|Summary Stylestyle]], while migrating the detailed information to their respective articles? This way we preserve a sufficient outline of the content, with further details given elsewhere. We definitely need to find a healthy balance, because admittedly this article is too long. [[User_talk:Spidern|<font color="darkred">←</font>]]<font color="green">[[User:Spidern|Spidern]]</font>[[Special:Contributions/Spidern|<font color="darkblue">→</font>]] 16:47, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
 
== External sources ==