Talk:Qin's wars of unification

China: History Mid‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Chinese history (assessed as Mid-importance).

Military history: Asian / Chinese / Classical

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Chinese military history task force
	Classical warfare task force (c. 700 BC – c. 500 AD)

Expansion

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I've expanded the article by adding information translated from Chinese Wikipedia and other miscellaneous sources in Chinese. I've yet to add in the references and almost all of them link back to Sima Qian's Shiji. Thoughts? _LDS (talk) 17:30, 13 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Expansion is good. Seems like the guy's proper name was King Zheng of Qin (秦王政), though, and not the anachronistic Ying Zheng; also, he obviously wasn't the one actually commanding the armies (he never did) and we could use the names of Qin's commanders. —

Llywelyn II

13:42, 26 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Calendar

Latest comment: 9 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Does it make sense to use Chinese Calendar dating for the events in China-related articles? Show some respect to cultures. Even Roman Calendar dating widely used today has been renumbered to account for Jes' coming otherwise we'd be in year 2066. A useful resource for this is https://ytliu0.github.io/ChineseCalendar/QinHanCalendars.html 1234567 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.70.52.5 (talk) 18:15, 2 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic