Talk:May Revolution/GA2

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: •Felix• ^T 20:33, 3 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

  1. Well-written:

         (a) the prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct; and
         (b) it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.

  2. Factually accurate and verifiable:

         (a) it provides references to all sources of information in the section(s) dedicated to the attribution of these sources according to the guide to layout;
         (b) it provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines;
         (c) it contains no original research.

  3. Broad in its coverage:

         (a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic;[4] and
         (b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).

  4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias.
  5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
  6. Illustrated, if possible, by images:

         (a) images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content; and
         (b) images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.

[edit] What is not a good article?