Content deleted Content added
→Kenia: new section |
|||
Line 162:
''However, the summit did not endorse the proposal for a mass withdrawal from the ICC due to lack of support for the idea.[133] Despite these calls the ICC went ahead with calling for Ruto to attend his trial.[134]'' Not clear what it is trying to say (maybe it is me). --[[User:Inayity|Inayity]] ([[User talk:Inayity|talk]]) 15:59, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
:I've moved some sentences around so that things flow more logically. Does [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=International_Criminal_Court&diff=578718117&oldid=578688262 this] clarify the issue? [[User:Danlaycock|TDL]] ([[User talk:Danlaycock|talk]]) 17:44, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
== Kenia ==
With [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=International_Criminal_Court&diff=595148972&oldid=595133184 this] edit (and a few edits before as well), info on Kenia was added, that in my view i) was already partly presented elsewhere (selective prosecution), ii) was not written from a neutral point of view (check the adjectives etcetc), and iii) was not in line with the transcript of the World Radio Netherlands source… I have therefore removed it and suggest to discuss here -if something needs to be included- what it should be…. Please do not readd it, until there is consensus for inclusion… [[User:L.tak|L.tak]] ([[User talk:L.tak|talk]])
| |||