A fact from Hananu Revolt appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 7 December 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Syria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Syria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SyriaWikipedia:WikiProject SyriaTemplate:WikiProject SyriaSyria articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
I'm not sure, but I'm thinking a map might be better in the infobox than a photo of the man?
Agree. I moved the map to the infobox. Also, now that I've got some details about the locations of certain battles/engagements during this revolt, I think I'll request that the map be modified to include some of those battles. --Al Ameer (talk) 03:59, 3 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
"Meanwhile, France claimed special interests in Syria" I think Sykes-Picot could be mentioned here.
"which was predominantly Turkish" In what sense do you mean here? I see you link to Turkish people, but I assume you mean the Turkish state as well? I think it could be clarified a bit...
"which had been the administrative center of its own province" I'd add "under the Ottomans" or similar, and perhaps not hide the vilayet name in an easter-egg link.
The Atatürk image could need some source info or replacement.
Damn, that's too bad since the timing of the image (1921) and his military dress aptly fit into the context of the article. I'll try to locate a source for it, but will replace it if I can't find one. I'll also try to find a source for the deleted Hananu image. Al Ameer (talk) 21:34, 19 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
The Fathallah Saqqal seems to be stretched horizontally, which looks weird.
Sounds good. I finished with the last issue raised at the Tanyus Shahin review, but forgot to update you. I'll make a note there now. --Al Ameer (talk) 22:45, 19 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
"coincided with Turkish revolts against the French military" Anything to link to?
"Hananu also co-founded the Arab Club in Aleppo" During the fighting?
The Arab Club Damascus branch was founded in late 1918, but it wasn't totally clear in the Gelvin source when the Aleppo branch was founded. I'll look into it. Al Ameer (talk) 17:44, 21 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
Perhaps mention what happened to Hananu after these events, as he is so important to them?
"referred to their revolts as part of the "general national movement of Western Aleppo"." Only stated in intro.
It's mentioned in the body as "general national movement in the region of Western Aleppo". I decided to shorten it in the lead, should I add "in the region" to the lead? Al Ameer (talk) 17:44, 21 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
"After early rebel victories, guerrilla operations stopped after" Double after seems repetitive...
Yea, there's a couple more things like the "quasi-state" line and Hananu's post-revolt life. It looks like someone added a source for the Ataturk image, I'll upload a picture of Hananu later today. I found a great source about the revolt, but it's in French so I'll have to tinker with it later. Will finish the remaining issues today and/or tomorrow. --Al Ameer (talk) 21:34, 23 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
@FunkMonk: Ok, I added a picture of Hananu and added some info about his future in Syria following the revolt. The quasi-state thing is actually already mentioned in the body in the Rebel organization section: "At the height of the revolt, Hananu effectively created a quasi-independent state between Aleppo and the Mediterranean Sea." Let me know if I missed anything. --Al Ameer (talk) 20:22, 24 March 2016 (UTC)Reply