Talk:Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market

See Net neutrality in the United States#Opposition to net neutrality and Net neutrality in the United States#Support of net neutrality for the sort of thing that I would like to see in this article. --Guy Macon (talk) 15:50, 5 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

I just stated section that list supporters/opponents. The lists need to be expanded, the most prominent supporters and opponents moved to the top, and eventually when the lists get to big the least notable entries should be trimmed. Please help! --Guy Macon (talk) 22:06, 5 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

I think that framing article like a TV debate with supporters and opponents is rarely helpful to make a good encyclopedia article. --Nemo 11:48, 6 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

It seemed to work well in the Net Neutrality article. Do you have an alternative structure that you would like to suggest? --Guy Macon (talk) 17:43, 6 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Yes. Only focus on objective facts theme by theme. Article 11 is already covered in Ancillary copyright for press publishers aka link tax though. --Nemo 08:33, 9 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Cory Doctorow just published (full disclosure: with a small amount of input from me) an analysis on the Electronic Frontier Foundation website:

The EU's Copyright Proposal is Extremely Bad News for Everyone, Even (Especially!) Wikipedia --Guy Macon (talk) 00:34, 8 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Here are some authoritative sources analysing Articles 13 and 11

http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2018/05/coreper-agrees-common-position-on-text.html?m=1 @ELawNora on twitter

Also the Kluwer Copyright Blog:

http://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2018/03/13/copyright-reform-new-right-press-publishers-not/ (on Art 11)

http://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2016/10/06/eu-copyright-reform-outside-safe-harbours-intermediary-liability-capsizes-incoherence/ (on Art 13 - a bit older, but mostly still valid)

There are also the open letters from academics:

https://www.create.ac.uk/policy-responses/eu-copyright-reform/