Content deleted Content added
Hob Gadling (talk | contribs) |
→Request for comment: new section |
||
Line 395:
The short description of the subject included the word Discredited (see https://w.wiki/Afsb). This has been there for some time. An editor removed it, I undid the edit and then after another period of time another editor removed it saying that the use of the word was 'extremely loaded'. I had re inserted the word as I explained because the fact he was dicredited was one of the main reasons of interest in this historical person. I would be grateful for thoughts, ideas and a concenus if possible. Thanks [[User:Edmund Patrick|Edmund Patrick]] –<small> [[User talk:Edmund Patrick|'''confer''']]</small> 15:11, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
:It's his most well-known property. --[[User:Hob Gadling|Hob Gadling]] ([[User talk:Hob Gadling|talk]]) 16:22, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
== Request for comment ==
{{rfc|bio|hist}}
The short description of the subject included the word Discredited (see https://w.wiki/Afsb). This word had been there for some time. An editor removed it, I undid the edit and then after another period of time another editor removed it saying that the use of the word was 'extremely loaded'. I had re inserted the word as I explained because the fact he was dicredited was one of the main reasons of interest in this historical person. Thank you. [[User:Edmund Patrick|Edmund Patrick]] –<small> [[User talk:Edmund Patrick|'''confer''']]</small> 07:12, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
| |||