Content deleted Content added
→Peak hour terminal edits: new section |
|||
| (36 intermediate revisions by 18 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|
{{
}}
{{ArticleHistory
|action1=GAN
|action1link=Talk:1 (New York City Subway service)#GA nomination
|action1date=18 March 2007
|action1result=not listed
|action1oldid=116008028
|action2=GAN
|action2link=Talk:1 (New York City Subway service)#GA Nomination Failed
|action2date=18 May 2007
|action2result=not listed
|action2oldid=131851065
|action3=GAN
|action3link=Talk:1 (New York City Subway service)/GA1
|action3date=7 October 2019
|action3result=not listed
|action3oldid=920283434
|action4=GAN
|action4link=Talk:1 (New York City Subway service)/GA2
|action4date=23:30, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
|action4result=not listed
|action4oldid=946099705
|topic=transport
|currentstatus=FGAN
}}
== Addresses of stations ==
Line 22 ⟶ 48:
I have reviewed this article against the [[WP:GA|Good Article]] (GA) [[WP:WIAGA|criteria]], and find that the article doesn't seem to meet one or more categories. In order to provide constructive criticism, I have below listed one or more of my reasons for failing the article, beside the relevant criteria title.
#Well-written: {{{wr|<
#Factually accurate: {{{wref|<
#Broad: {{{b|<
#Neutrally written: {{{nw|<
#Stable: {{{s|<
#Well-referenced: {{{fa|<
#Images: {{{i|<
My thanks to the lead editors for your hard work; please keep it up.
Line 79 ⟶ 105:
**IMO, the service history sections are pretty awful for pretty much ''all'' of the NYCS service pages. It's a very big job to edit them so that they: A) read well as prose; B) are accurate; C) present all of the desired information in a sensible way. Part of the problem is that the services have changed so often. Practically every service that is physically possible has been operated at some point. [[User:Marc Shepherd|Marc Shepherd]] 21:42, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
*So please focus on the fixups, pretty please even, and try to remember reverts are a slap in the face to people, and '''just asking for a slap back'''. They really ought to be banned except to revert vandals. // <b>[[User:Fabartus|Fra]]</b
**Ditto to that. I've taken a look at the work both of these editors have done—both on this page and on many other pages. Both have made edits I disagreed with, and both have made important contributions that are extremely useful. They need to find a way to value each other's contributions. The NYC Subway pages are vast and heavily inter-connected. It is especially important to seek consensus before making any change that fundamentally changes the relationship among various pages. [[User:Marc Shepherd|Marc Shepherd]] 21:42, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Line 182 ⟶ 208:
[[Special:Contributions/72.80.208.20|72.80.208.20]] ([[User talk:72.80.208.20|talk]]) 18:27, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
--------
Good morning. I am the same user as 72.80.208.20. It appears that the consensus is that the "Connections" column is the best location to enter the peak hour terminal changes. I have now entered all peak hour route shortenings that occur more than 2 or 3 times daily - except for the L train and the 2 train, whose pages are both currently locked. I have avoided entering the truly rare cases that occur only 2 or 3 or even once daily (such as for the D train at 145th street instead of at 206th street - there is only 1 such train daily that starts at there and only 2 that terminate there daily). I hope that this is a reasonable approach. As always, constructive comments and suggestions are welcome. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/72.80.190.102|72.80.190.102]] ([[User talk:72.80.190.102|talk]]) 15:35, 21 May 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
== R62 1 Train Picture ==
Because the 1 operates a set of R62s, I believe that there should probably be a picture of that train operating on the 1. I mean, it's just my opinion, but I believe there should be at least one picture of all of the car models that each route operates. Does anyone agree? And if you are a photographer, could you upload a picture of that train and place it on this article? PS: Use Wikimedia Commons to upload. It's literally the easiest way to upload files.
--[[User:Davidng913|Davidng913]] ([[User talk:Davidng913|talk]]) 15:00, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
== External links modified ==
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on [[1 (New York City Subway service)]]. Please take a moment to review [[special:diff/808486391|my edit]]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160825164246/http://gothamist.com/2005/05/25/the_number_9_trains_final_days.php to http://gothamist.com/2005/05/25/the_number_9_trains_final_days.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}
Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 04:09, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
{{Talk:1 (New York City Subway service)/GA1}}
{{Talk:1 (New York City Subway service)/GA2}}
== Issues ==
Personally, I would not have promoted this article to GA status as there are still several {{tl|citation needed}} tags on this page. I may get to these tomorrow. {{re|Kew Gardens 613}} Would you have time to resolve these tags after your finals? [[User:Epicgenius|epicgenius]] ([[User talk:Epicgenius|talk]]) 15:10, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
{{ping|Epicgenius}} and {{ping|Kew Gardens 613}}. I have no idea how this passed. I have not been able to tend to the issues as I am currently mourning a sudden death that occurred in my family. Even before that, I had a "busy" tag on my talk page as other off-wiki things were occurring. {{ping|BlueMoonset}} What do you think about Happypills review? We have worked with the user in the past and they have some troubling history with GA. [[User:AmericanAir88|<b style="color: blue">AmericanAir88</b>]]<sup>([[User talk:AmericanAir88|<b style="color: darkred">talk</b>]])</sup> 16:01, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
:[[User:AmericanAir88|AmericanAir88]], I'm so very sorry for your loss. To answer your query, I do not understand how an article with any "citation needed" templates, much less four of them, could be passed as a GA; by definition, it does not meet the verifiability criteria listed in the [[WP:WIAGA|Good Article criteria]]. I also don't think sufficient attention has been paid to the text. There are inconsistencies in how the train numbering is treated: mostly bold, but sometimes regular roman. The links to other routes are done in a haphazard fashion, rather than first usage. These should have been noted in a review as well. In terms of clarity and the 3b criteria (not going into unnecessary detail), I would have suggested reorganizing and condensing in the skip-stop paragraphs so that the goals were stated in the first paragraph rather than relegated to the fourth, and the material trimmed of some of the details, which were also somewhat repetitive over the many paragraphs. Aside from that, there's at least one contraction that should have been fixed, and some jargon that won't be understood by people unfamiliar with subway systems (for example, {{tq|running on 12-minute headways}}); these all should have been noted in a review so they could have been dealt with. I always worry when the reviewer finds not a single typo or similar issue (unless I see they've done minor fixes themselves): an article without a single spelling or grammatical error is a rare bird indeed. So I think it's a good thing that the review has been reopened, and a more experienced reviewer will be checking things over. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 17:48, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
:{{re|AmericanAir88}} My condolences for your loss, and I hope everything gets better. In the meantime, Kew Gardens and I am both very busy throughout this week, but I might be able to tackle some of the issues that {{u|BlueMoonset}} and {{u|Kingsif}} have pointed out. These second opinions are much appreciated. [[User:Epicgenius|epicgenius]] ([[User talk:Epicgenius|talk]]) 01:20, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
:{{re|AmericanAir88}} I am so sorry about your loss. Like Epicgenius said, I am very busy at the moment. Once I get the work out of the way, I will tend to this.--[[User:Kew Gardens 613|Kew Gardens 613]] ([[User talk:Kew Gardens 613|talk]]) 01:33, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
:{{re|AmericanAir88}} Having just read this section, I will also share my condolences. Take whatever time you need for this. [[User:Kingsif|Kingsif]] ([[User talk:Kingsif|talk]]) 01:52, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
== Daily News ISSN ==
{{Re|Epicgenius}} I just realized that I have made an error for dozens of articles, having accidentally put the NY Times' ISSN in Daily News citations. According to WorldCat, it doesn't have an ISSN. Do you know if there is some way to determine all the articles that have this error so they can be fixed? Thanks.--[[User:Kew Gardens 613|Kew Gardens 613]] ([[User talk:Kew Gardens 613|talk]]) 13:44, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
:{{re|Kew Gardens 613}} Do you remember if you put NY Daily News ISSNs with the nydailynews.com citations, newspapers.com citations, or both? In either case, we can search for [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?sort=relevance&search=Daily+News+0362-4331&title=Special:Search&profile=advanced&fulltext=1&advancedSearch-current=%7B%7D&ns0=1 "Daily News" and the ISSN 0362-4331], though this is not a foolproof method. [[User:Epicgenius|epicgenius]] ([[User talk:Epicgenius|talk]]) 13:48, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
| |||