Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2024 July 14: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Javert2113 (talk | contribs) Comment |
|||
Line 16:
:'''Keep,''' a historical image. This is similar to [[Raising the Flag on Iwo Jima]] and [[Raising the Flag at Ground Zero]]. [[User:LuxembourgLover|LuxembourgLover]] ([[User talk:LuxembourgLover|talk]]) 00:39, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
::{{replyto|LuxembourgLover}} There's a fundamental difference in the situations. Those "raising the flag" pages are ''about'' the photographs in question, so the photographs are necessary to better understand the article. There is no page about "Evan Vucci's photograph of Donald Trump". [[User:Di (they-them)|Di (they-them)]] ([[User talk:Di (they-them)|talk]]) 00:44, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
::This is a wholly fanciful argument that does not jibe with [[WP:NFCC]]. It is beyond laughable to think you can declare something "historical" mere hours after the fact. [[User:Zaathras|Zaathras]] ([[User talk:Zaathras|talk]]) 00:45, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
:'''Keep''' per [[User:LuxembourgLover|LuxembourgLover]] ([[User talk:Not0nshoree|Discuss]] [[User:Not0nshoree|'''''0nshore's''''']] [[Special:contributions/Not0nshoree|contributions!!!]]) 00:41, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
:'''Keep.''' Well-justified in its description (no low-resolution free-use images of this event exist) and the image captures the unparalleled significance of the moment very fittingly for the article. The image from the [[murder of Lee Harvey Oswald]] comes to mind as a good analogy -- alternatives may exist, but the historic angle and context of that one image is undeniable. [[User:HandIsNotNookls|HandIsNotNookls]] ([[User talk:HandIsNotNookls|talk]])
| |||