Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Opposite Day: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Opposite Day: Reply |
Qwaiiplayer (talk | contribs) →Opposite Day: delete |
||
Line 27:
:<p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <small style="color:#999;text-shadow:#D3D3D3 0.3em 0.3em 0.15em">— [[User:Coffee|<span style="font-size: larger; color:#ffa439">Coffee</span>]] // [[user talk:Coffee|<span style="color:#090">have a</span> ☕️]] // [[Special:Contribs/Coffee|<span style="color:#4682b4">beans</span>]] // </small> 09:06, 20 February 2022 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:XfD relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Opposite Day]]</noinclude></p>
*'''Keep''' – Concurring with {{u|Hobit}}. Subject ''is'' notable, despite the article [[WP:ASZ|being short]]. Certainly needs some cleanup to provide additional RS, however, arguments for deletion appear to focus too centrally on a [[WP:LONGTIME]] fallacy. Article contents do not dictate notability, the subject does, for which GNG is met... at least to my eye. [[User:Babegriev|Bgv.]] ([[User talk:Babegriev|talk]]) 10:29, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' My main issue with the sources posted is that they fail reliability and independence standards. The 3 news sources are based upon the article from the [https://nationaltoday.com/opposite-day/ National Today] website, which makes dubious claims that I couldn't verify (e.g. Eisenhower declared August 17th opposite day. That'd be a really cool origin story if there were a single reliable independent source about it). Doing my own [[WP:BEFORE]] I couldn't find any reliable sources discussing the holiday in any detail other than the obvious "here's some ideas of what to do on opposite day." While it's a commonly used phrase, that doesn't justify a Wikipedia article per [[WP:NOTDICT]]. [[User:Qwaiiplayer|Qwaiiplayer]] ([[User talk:Qwaiiplayer|talk]]) 14:04, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
| |||