Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Development of Windows 95

Development of Windows 95

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks references. Source mentioned on talk page is a blog, not a [WP:RS

'Comment right well, that i'll remove. as for references, the only otehr site that i can find with windows chicago listed thourgholy are the three entrires at this link: http://toastytech.com/guis/indexwindows.html other than that, there is no place that has chicago talked about as good as toastytech. and for windows memphis, theres a little more, but not much more than win chicago. it's not my fault that no one cares about old, buggy beta software.

Linuxlove8088 (talk) 00:17, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect/merge with windows 95. Ikip (talk) 01:16, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

redirecting windows chicago page to windows 95? i would prefer merging the chicago page into windows 95 rather then have my articlce lost for all eternity :/

Linuxlove8088 (talk) 01:49, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There are 2 types of redirect/merge, one keeps the history, one deletes the history and redirects the page. I think the history should be kept. Ikip (talk) 02:13, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why? Is there valuable information in the history?--RadioFan (talk) 12:17, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

merge We just need to specify merge, the redirect is automatic and required to preserve the history. Should have been in main article from the start. DGG ( talk ) 02:20, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into Windows 95. TomCat4680 (talk) 03:01, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment merge? meh, go ahead just don't fully delete my article :\ Linuxlove8088 (talk) 03:09, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Just to be clear, it's not your article.--RadioFan (talk) 12:17, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

sorry, i'm still a newb to wikipedia stuff.Linuxlove8088 (talk) 16:15, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]