Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cate Edwards: Difference between revisions

**There are multiple non-trivial, independent, and reliable sources about ''her'' specifically. Please see [http://www.dailyprincetonian.com/archives/2004/02/03/news/9467.shtml], [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A22435-2004Jul28.html], [http://teacher.scholastic.com/scholasticnews/indepth/kids_primaries/get_out_vote/index.asp?article=edwards_qa], [http://www.uncp.edu/news/2004/cate_edwards.htm]. -- [[User:Black Falcon|Black Falcon]] 05:29, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

*'''Keep''' - Is the subject of mulitple non-trivial published works, as provided by [[User:Black Falcon|Black Falcon]] above. While someone who is a relative of a notable person but has no published works about them is not a reason to keep an article, someone who is the relative of a notable person who <i>does</i> have multiple publshed works about them is no reason to delete them either. Under the logic of some of the delete voters above [[George W. Bush]] should be deleted because "he's only notable thanks of his father." --[[User:Oakshade|Oakshade]] 01:42, 10 March 2007 (UTC)