Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Vanamonde93 (talk | contribs) →Statement by Vanamonde93: cmt @OR |
Bharatiya29 (talk | contribs) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 556:
===Statement by RaviC===
No comments on these appeals yet. I should note however that I had requested Doug Weller due to his heavy [[WP:INVOLVED|involvement]] with a few editors listed in this request. Whilst Doug Weller has not disagreed that he is involved, he seems to be refusing to recuse.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Doug_Weller&oldid=844093019#Recuse] --[[User:RaviC|RaviC]] ([[User talk:RaviC|talk]]) 15:42, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
===Statement by Bharatiya29===
I had looked into this request sometime before but didn't commented then because I couldn't really make up my mind at that time. But having now read through the statements at AE and here, I feel that at least three topic bans should be preserved since these three editors have caused massive amount of disruption, and as pointed above, that if they had been topic banned at the right time as the result of the strong AE reports against them,[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Archive217#NadirAli][https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Archive221#NadirAli][https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Archive227#Mar4d] there would be no such collateral damage that we are seeing now.{{pb}}
1) '''TripWire''': he says here that he was topic banned during his "younger days", and then was eventually "blocked for 48 hrs for no fault of mine",[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification_and_Amendment&diff=prev&oldid=842732109] which is a clear misrepresentation of the credibility of his block that was imposed because he himself violated 2RR. {{U|TripWire}} has surprisingly omitted the ARE report from July 2016, where I had participated as well.[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Archive196#TripWire] This ARE resulted in a 3 months topic ban on TripWire from entire [[Balochistan]] subject, not to mention that TripWire is currently still under a "casting aspersions" sanction as a result of that ARE.
2) '''NadirAli''': needs no introduction. He was site banned as result of the original ARBIPA case[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/India-Pakistan#Nadirali_banned] and topic banned, which he later appealed.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:NadirAli&diff=696543484&oldid=696470060] He claimed here that "I had broken no 3RR", [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification_and_Amendment&diff=prev&oldid=842714677] while technically true, the statement is unconvincing to defend his record, given his 3 reverts on [[Princely state]] well under an hour.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Princely_state&diff=840787333&oldid=839412699][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Princely_state&diff=840787889&oldid=840787674][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Princely_state&diff=840790420&oldid=840790000]
3) '''Mar4d''': his actions include source misrepresentation,[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sindhudesh&diff=838848458&oldid=838820546] edit warring on [[2016 Indian Line of Control strike]][https://tools.wmflabs.org/sigma/usersearch.py?name=Mar4d&page=2016_Indian_Line_of_Control_strike&server=enwiki&max=] while misrepresenting [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:India–Pakistan_border_skirmishes_(2016–present)#Closure_of_status_or_change_of_title established consensus] as ''no consensus'',[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=840714488] harassment of MapSGV,[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MapSGV&diff=828560251&oldid=828519459][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ivanvector&diff=prev&oldid=839151380][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=839714232] poor AfD nomination[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/2016_Indian_Line_of_Control_strike] and then he went on to tag the article with [[WP:A10|CSD A10]] while the AfD was still running,[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=840721869&diff=prev] in fact, no longer than a few hours before the ARE was filed. His disruption is clearly highest among all other editors. Add to this: the topic ban violations as pointed above in this [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification_and_Amendment&diff=prev&oldid=844219576 edit] further leaves me with no doubt that the topic ban ought to be preserved in Mar4d's case.
At present, this is my stance regarding this case. [[User:Bharatiya29|<font color="#FF9933">Bharatiya</font>]][[User talk:Bharatiya29|<font color="#138808">29</font>]] 09:04, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
=== Statement by {other-editor} ===
Other editors are free to make relevant comments on this request as necessary. Comments here should address why or why not the Committee should accept the amendment request or provide additional information.
| |||