Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Anon IP removing notability tags and other templates: Another development |
|||
Line 881:
:::::::This board isn't suitable for monitoring long term abuse. Each incident washes into the archives before we have a chance to connect the dots. Where shall we go that we can open a conversation and leave it open for a month or two where at least several uninvolved admins will see it? - [[User:Jehochman|Jehochman]] <sup>[[User_talk:Jehochman|Talk]]</sup> 04:19, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
::::::::AN/I's a good as a place as there is now, a few of the topics at the top of the page have been under scrutiny for more than three weeks now. [[user:east718|<small style="background:#fff;border:#090 1px solid;color:#000;padding:0px 3px 1px 4px;white-space:nowrap">'''east<big style="color:#090">.</big><font color="gray">718</font>''' ''at 07:27, 10/19/2007''</small>]]
Firstly, as stated to JFW, in spring 2006, on the Wessely Talk page, I do not hate Prof Wessely. I have never met Prof Wessely nor have I had telephone contact with him. I have never sent him paper letters. The only contact I have had with Prof Wessely is a single email in which I politely requested a public statement from him regarding the debacle over the alleged cancellation of the Gresham College lecture, in early 2006. Prof Wessely kindly provided me with a statement. I have retained copies of both these emails which are available for inspection. '''That is the sum total of my contact with Prof Wessely.''' It might be construed, from what he has written above, that Mr Guy Chapman (no relation) is implying that I am guilty of "harassment" of Prof Wessely. If this is his intention, then this is inflammatory and there is no basis whatsoever for any such implication, and any such implication would be false, since it cannot be said that I have ever "harassed" Prof Wessely, in any way, either via written material on the internet, or by any other means. There is a definition of "harassment" in UK law and I suggest that Mr Guy Chapman familiarises himself with this. If Mr Guy Chapman holds any documentary evidence from any source (including from Prof Wessely, himself) that supports any claim or implication that I might have "harassed" Prof Wessely, in any way, then I suggest that he set them before me in a paper letter or in electronic form in order that I might forward them on to my solicitor to deal with. [[User:MEagenda|MEagenda]] 08:09, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
== Problems with a shared computer ==
| |||