Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Epicgenius (talk | contribs) |
He DOES get the last word, as the closer. Your statement implies that it was moved to arbcom, when in fact it was closed and then unilaterally forum shopped to arbcom. |
||
Line 253:
== [[User:Kafziel]] abusing admin tools and overriding long established consensus ==
{{archive top|result=Absolutely zero evidence has been produced during this unnecessarily long discussion to show that [[User:Kafziel|Kafziel]] has in any way abused his admin tools, nor has any evidence been produced that what he's done in the realms of AFC is against policy (''de facto'' AFC processes are irrelevant). This noticeboard is not for [[WP:WITCHHUNT|witchhunts]]. The editors at AFC are reminded that they do not [[WP:OWN]] the articles there, and that if an article goes explicitly against policy (i.e. attack pages, spam, copyvios), any admin is permitted to delete them. Given this, there is no possible reason to keep this thread open except for an exercise in futility. <small style="color:#999;white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:lightgrey 0.3em 0.3em 0.15em;">— [[User:Coffee|<big style="color:#ffa439">Coffee</big>]] // [[user talk:Coffee|<font color="#009900">have a cup</font>]] // [[Special:Contributions/Coffee|<font color="#4682b4">beans</font>]] // </small> 16:05, 10 December 2013 (UTC)}}
Hello all. I would like to make an ANI report against Kafziel even though he has only responded to one warning message (so I presume he has only read one), because (1) it seems quite serious and may even constitute enough reason for a permanent desysopping and (2) reversion of his edits needs administrative attention anyway.
Line 619:
*Could we ask that Alansohn [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=585359631&oldid=585356774 stop] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=585386237&oldid=585385864 changing] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=585438476&oldid=585438129 the section title] to misconstrue this discussion? <small style="color:#999;white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:lightgrey 0.3em 0.3em 0.15em;">— [[User:Coffee|<big style="color:#ffa439">Coffee</big>]] // [[user talk:Coffee|<font color="#009900">have a cup</font>]] // [[Special:Contributions/Coffee|<font color="#4682b4">beans</font>]] // </small> 14:58, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
**This discussion here is primarily about the mass deletion of categories and their potential recreation. I fail to see how a title that neutrally describes the discussion misconstrues anything and is better than a link to a single user name. I still get top billing, but Coffee can have it if he wants it. [[User:Alansohn|Alansohn]] ([[User talk:Alansohn|talk]]) 16:05, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
== Request to block disruptive user Medeis ==
Line 741 ⟶ 740:
:Thanks. I tried to improve, but some editors, such as ColonelHenry and Cwmhiraeth, made it clear to me that rules and procedures trumped everything, including verifiability. Both of these users fought to keep bad science in article space, in spite of the information being made up nonsense. It would be more fun to write accurate articles than to post about nonsense, but the former is not welcome here. --[[User:AfadsBad|AfadsBad]] ([[User talk:AfadsBad|talk]]) 16:47, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
::* No offense, but I would have been glad to work with you had you approached me initially with a little less of the aggressive "bull in a china shop" swagger. In fact, I aim to improve [[Dent corn]] in the next few months, and if you could get off your condescending high horse, I would probably enjoy your opinion and expertise as that work proceeds. But as long as you continue to be belligerent, I would never waste my time attempting to collaborate with you.--[[User:ColonelHenry|ColonelHenry]] ([[User talk:ColonelHenry|talk]]) 17:01, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
== 70.120.95.221 - continued disruption and possible sock ==
Line 770 ⟶ 767:
:::There probably are advertising issues with the article though, I haven't had the time to go through it, but a quick glance looks like yes it is advertising. [[User:Canterbury Tail|<font color="Blue">'''Canterbury Tail'''</font>]] [[User talk:Canterbury Tail|''<font color="Blue">talk</font>'']] 16:46, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
== Vandalism report ==
| |||