Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 April 14

< Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion | Log

April 14

edit

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 14, 2020.

NCIS: OSP

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 April 22#NCIS: OSP

Arathorn, son of Arador

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 April 22#Arathorn, son of Arador

Dírhael

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:45, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target article. No WP:ATT issues with deletion. It is mentioned in three articles: A mention in a video game plot summary, a mention at an actor's page that he voiced said video game character, and a mention in the plot summary of a fan film. Not convinced there's any one best targeting point out of any of these. Hog Farm (talk) 23:37, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Vidyasagar(Indian music director)

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:43, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bad spacing, no incoming links or substantive page history. Cheers, gnu57 21:44, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Charlotte Clair

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete -- JHunterJ (talk) 19:18, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of anyone with this name at any of the possible targets, unable to clearly tell where this was meant to redirect to either. Iffy★Chat -- 19:52, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak retarget to Charlotte Flair (1st choice), since the F and C keys are adjacent to each other, and someone's finger might slip off the F key onto the C key, and I can also see someone forgetting the E. Weak delete (2nd choice) if that doesn't work-I did find an actress by the (stage) name Charlotte Claire on IMDb who apparently appeared in Jaihind 2 but isn't mentioned on its article. To complicate things further, Charlotte Claire redirects to the page about the French Revolution general Charles Leclerc, which I'm adding to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 21:41, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'll level with ya—I've had a few friends unfamiliar with Formula One ask me "Who is this 'Charlotte Clair[e]' they keep raving about?" Of course, they mean Charles Leclerc, which, when pronounced properly with the silent S and C, sounds almost identical to Charlotte Clair[e]. Guess I was helping them out and anyone else who might get them confused, heh. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 22:35, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipedia bias

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Wikipedia#Coverage of topics and systemic bias. --BDD (talk) 20:40, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bundle of many articles that appear like they should have the same target, but do not. Surprisingly, I am of the opinion that these should all target Wikipedia#Coverage of topics and systemic bias (which none of the previous redirects point to), but all of the current targets could very well be potential answers. Utopes (talk / cont) 18:59, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Redirects-Wikipedia

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:34, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know how someone would search "Wikipedia" in the title of a Wikipedia article in this context (although there are some redirects that help people reach their destinations by including "Wikipedia," I don't know how helpful these would be). As cited in the "Deopahar" one's move, it was done for "more accurate search results," perhaps why some of them were moved. Regards, SONIC678 17:50, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No, I wasn't the author. I have no idea why I ever touched the article! I was probably patrolling New Pages, or something like that........ PKT(alk) 18:37, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Please check on my new article

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. SNOW close, it's basically an R3, so I've used that. Nick (talk) 15:15, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This...just doesn't make any sense, and can refer to any article on Wikipedia. Regards, SONIC678 17:12, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Chaotic Neutral (example of a full article)

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:32, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure someone would search with this disambiguator...back in 2006, the page about its associated DnD alignment was moved from this title, turned into an article about the alignment, then redirected here, and later turned into a disambiguation page. Maybe delete this title, or if that doesn't work, retarget back to Chaotic Neutral? Regards, SONIC678 17:11, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipedia:Keep Calm and Click Edit

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:38, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Recently created and unused. The redirect target is just too narrow. This could just as easily point to pages concerning edit warring, disruptive editing, or several other conduct policies and guidelines. It ought to be deleted. Bsherr (talk) 17:07, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Waluigi pinball

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:31, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see why we need a redirect for one specific race track from this game, especially with an incorrectly capitalised title. It has never had any article content. – numbermaniac 14:52, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Over to You

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:32, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Over to You: Ten Stories of Flyers and Flying. The Roald Dahl book is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC rather than the non-notable track on the Black Sabbath album. (A DAB hatnote for the song could be added to the Dahl book page if necessary.) Muzilon (talk) 10:41, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Computer Science (art)

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:30, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Super obscure synonym, created from a page move. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 10:19, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - My first thought is that this ought to point to a different article, but then the redirect is rather unclear in the first place. Is it meant to involve artwork created with the aid of computers? Artwork portrayed on computers? Artwork created by computer programs themselves, running independently without people? Deletion seems to be the right call. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 05:48, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Original content

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:29, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect created in 2008. Pretty sure the target is not what it means today. Paul_012 (talk) 09:35, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipedia:Monobook

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) feminist #WearAMask😷 16:56, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Found this discussion and thought this anomaly of targeting is worth a discussion here. I don't recommend a particular action at the moment, just throwing this out here for thoughts. — J947 [cont] 06:24, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. The linked discussion was for a mainspace redirect, so it's not the same situation. This is a Wikipedia space redirect, and so only has to be "notable"/relevant in the context of Wikipedia, not the larger world. There's no harm in the redirect; on the contrary, what would be harmful is the lack of a redirect: a user looking for help or information about Monobook and finding nothing and not getting any result when they type in "Wikipedia:Monobook", which one would expect to find help or get useful information. —Lowellian (reply) 15:40, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Lowellian: Sorry, I didn't make it clear. There are two redirects being discussed here which have very similar names, but point to different targets. I made the discussion to sort out where these redirects should target; they probably should both target to the same place. I found this targeting anomaly by reading the closure of the aforementioned discussion. — J947 [cont] 20:38, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I don't agree that they "should both target to the same place". Someone typing in "Wikipedia:Monobook" is probably looking for information about the skin or to edit the skin, and someone typing in "Wikipedia:Monobook.js" is probably looking for the JavaScript file, so they are not the same. —Lowellian (reply) 03:14, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
keep per this. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 10:48, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Soulji

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:28, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target. No other mention. Jalen Folf (talk) 05:19, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Macedonia(kingdom history)

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:28, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Malformed disambiguator (missing a space before the open paren). Apologies if this is the wrong venue: this redirect does have history (it was an unsourced, rambling schoolboy essay created in 2010 and blanked-and-redirected 20 minutes later), but I do not think it has to be preserved as potentially useful content (it is not) or for the sake of licensing and attribution (it has not been copied/merged elsewhere, as far as I can tell). Cheers, gnu57 03:56, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit: copied the rambling schooboy essay to the talk page of "Macedonia (ancient kingdom)", along with the perfectly accurate description given in the nomination above. Now nothing will be lost when the redirect is deleted. P Aculeius (talk) 14:46, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

.csproj

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to List of filename extensions (A–E)#CSPROJ. (non-admin closure) feminist #WearAMask😷 02:46, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. Maybe add to List of filename extensions (A–E) and retarget? 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 19:48, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 01:14, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

❶

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 April 22#❶

Nina Коvacheva

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:26, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The K and the o are Cyrillic. {{R from move}}. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 23:10, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ mazca talk 00:25, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Office (U.S. seasons))/redirects

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:23, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

These redirects were left over from moves to get away from incoming links. Looking at their histories, they were kept to avoid "recklessly caus[ing] linkrot" in 2012, but it doesn't seem like anything links to them now, further making me wonder if we should still keep them here, or how useful they are. Also, the last four have double parentheses at the end. Regards, SONIC678 00:22, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2020_April_14&oldid=1072177306"