Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Winningreen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mkdw ^talk 06:16, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Winningreen

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An old, unreferenced, orphan, stub article. Google searches turned up nothing apart from mirrors of the article's contents and hits for the company's own website. It does not seem to pass WP:GNG. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 04:40, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:45, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:45, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:45, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I can find a few Chicago Sun-Times pieces by the firm's CEO, but nothing substantial about the firm itself, such as anything which could reference the claims in the article. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 08:28, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as there's simply nothing to suggest better notability and nearly even speedy material. SwisterTwister talk 00:01, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete notability not shown.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 02:51, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.