TarnishedPath

  Hello! Your submission of SDSS J0849+1114 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Chaiten1 (talk) 08:13, 20 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

On 25 September 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article SDSS J0849+1114, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that light travelled 1.06 billion light-years from a trio of galaxies in the constellation of Cancer, where three supermassive black holes were colliding? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/SDSS J0849+1114. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, SDSS J0849+1114), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:02, 25 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Thomas Sewell (neo-Nazi) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of PARAKANYAA -- PARAKANYAA (talk) 09:42, 27 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi there. Just querying your removal of "where it is formally banned" here. That appears to be supported by the source. Cordless Larry (talk) 09:29, 31 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

If you look at the edit history I stuffed up my first attempt at restoring the material that Jamie had removed in the university section. I didn't intend on reverting all of their edits, just the first two out of three, as I was assuming good faith when they wrote "unsourced commentary" in their edit summary at Special:Diff/1254498510. As I did end up reverting everything I reinstated their third edit. I hope that all makes sense. As it turns out that the material is sourced, so I will self-revert now. TarnishedPath^talk 10:05, 31 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hey, I wanted offer another apology now that the election results are out. I appreciated your courteousness and frankness in your comments to my election page. If you ever see me do something like that again, please tell me or notify someone else as soon as possible so that they can take action. I'm very sorry for any distress I caused. Keep up the hard work. Best, ~ Pbritti (talk) 22:41, 4 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Pbritti, thank you for reaching out and once again thankyou for your candid response. I also would like to apologise if you felt aggrieved at my comments elsewhere. You weren't the subject of my comments but I could understand how you would feel aggrieved nonetheless as the person I was responding to had made you the subject of their comments.

I looked up the election results and I see you just missed out. I hope you get through next time you nominate. TarnishedPath^talk 03:20, 5 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

No need to apologize for anything at all on your end. Your well-wishes are appreciated. I don't know if I want to go through RfA anytime soon and I look forward to aiming for a five FA year in 2025 (alongside offline life). ~ Pbritti (talk) 03:32, 5 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

“Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.”

I believe you are the moderator of the Imane Khelif talk page. I request it be opened back up for discussion of the reliable sources that have published news about her new lawsuit. LockheedChomsky (talk) 02:36, 7 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi @LockheedChomsky, I'm not a moderator. The administrator who protected the article's talk page at Special:Diff/1255516068 is @El C. You'd need to direct your queries to them. TarnishedPath^talk 06:07, 7 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi TarnishedPath. The Wikipediocracy-related conduct case request has been declined. While the arbitrators were closely divided, there was not an absolute majority to accept the case. For the Arbitration Committee, SilverLocust 💬 06:40, 7 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:30, 11 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

This page Candidates of the next Australian federal election is being subject to Inclusionism again IMHO. I removed the joint entry of Bradlow & Bock as Vic Senate Candidates but it was restored. As only a single person can add their name to the nomination form, this team will never become candidates. Added a note to Talk:Candidates of the next Australian federal election. Teraplane (talk) 02:32, 14 November 2024 (UTC)Reply