Quadalpha

You were listed on the Wikipedia:Wikipedians/New Jersey page as living in or being associated with New Jersey. As part of the Wikipedia:User categorisation project, these lists are being replaced with user categories. If you would like to add yourself to the category that is replacing the page, please visit Category:Wikipedians in New Jersey for instructions. Al 15:32, August 29, 2005 (UTC)

Greetings, Quadalpha! Please accept this message as an invitation to categorise your user page in the category Category:Chinese Wikipedians overseas and removing your name from the Wikipedia:Wikipedians/China#Overseas page. The page will be deleted when all users have been removed. Even if you do not wish to be placed in a category, could you take a moment to remove your name from the Wikipedia:Wikipedians/China#Overseas page? Thanks!!

To add your name to the category, please use the tag [[Category:Chinese Wikipedians overseas|Quadalpha]] to ensure proper sorting.

For more information, please see Wikipedia:User categorisation and Category:Wikipedians by location. --Miborovsky 03:04, 9 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

We are the promoters of the Wikipedia in Ancient Greek. we need your help, specially for write NEW ARTICLES and the TRANSLATION OF THE MEDIAWIKI INTERFACE FOR ANCIENT GREEK, for demonstrating, to the language subcommittee, the value of our project.

Thanks a lot for your help. Ἡ Οὐικιπαιδεία needs you! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.40.197.5 (talk) 19:55, 30 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Greetings, fellow Latinist. If you have second, please share your thoughts in the discussion of a category for native Latin speakers who are also Wikipedians. --Flex 13:33, 30 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

You were listed on the Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Ontario page as living in or being associated with Ontario. As part of the Wikipedia:User categorisation project, these lists are being replaced with user categories. If you would like to add yourself to the category that is replacing the page, please visit Category:Wikipedians in Ontario for instructions.--Rmky87 04:07, 10 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, I accidentally clicked on "Rollback" and reverted your reversion, and you had reverted before I had had a chance to correct my mistake. Titoxd^(?!?) 01:06, 26 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

Not a war! Helpful co-operation towards a mutual goal, I am sure. However regards the use of the "serial comma", see [1]. There is no Wiki consensus on this. I feel its presence, where not necessary to avoid ambiguity, is an unnecessary punctuation presence, but I think there's far bigger things to address in this (and other) articles. There's nothing about The Hollow Men (apart from in Popular Recognition) or Aerial poems for a start!! Tyrenius 20:37, 11 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

I know, but I still don't like serial commas! Tyrenius 21:07, 11 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

You're one of the best... Tyrenius 21:55, 11 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hi,

Just a quick heads-up: When you revert vandalism, please don't forget to go to the vandal's talk page and give them the appropriate warning. Not only does the vandal then know that we're on to him/her, but it also allows other editors to assess a vandal's past conduct by a glance at his/her talk page.

Thanks! :)

Hbackman 01:54, 27 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the catch on that. I was going through correcting 'apparati' to 'apparatus', and ran into it in a phrasing that was unfamiliar to me. -- Kazrak 15:28, 28 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for making the voice-number correction, and adding some info to, the article above. Are you sure it's five voices in the Idea of North? I know it's at least four - three men and a woman - but not counting Gould, I don't know about the fifth. Outriggr 23:54, 17 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

I noticed in your edit to Iliad#Synopsis you removed the links to the two articles that exist on particular passages of the books. I've reverted your edit as I think it is important that these links remain in the synopsis section as they point users to more detailed information on those passages. Best wishes.Madmedea 12:43, 15 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair enough, but I think the reason for highlighting them in a different section is that they are currently the only passages from the Iliad that have their own article pages. I'm going to put an {{expand-section}} tag in to encourage people to add new sub-articles and remove the "key" from the section title.Madmedea 17:10, 15 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, but I was wondering if you were Richard Liang. If so, it is very good to see you (it's Eric Brown). If not, sorry for the interruption. Homagetocatalonia 18:00, 7 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi Quadalpha, thanks for the greeting. It's nice to see someone working on the Iliad article; I suppose I should chip in... --Akhilleus (talk) 22:48, 2 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hmm, seems you were right after all, the source fails RS. Sorry if I talked down to you last night, but this section has our hearts just broken. I'll leave it with Modernist to see if s/he can find another source, but if not the Dali section will have to go. Aaargh! ;) Ceoil 20:19, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Modernist is well pissed off at the moment, and I can't blame him/her tbh; this is very dissapointing. Oh well thats life - we have agreed to cut and come back to it later when we are both less green eyed and emotionally involved. All told I'm glad you stuck with it, so no hard feelings from me either. ( Ceoil ^sláinte 23:39, 18 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

If you feel like throwing a few quid at me to rewrite and resouce the section, nobody would need to know ;) Just us two. Srlsly. ( Ceoil ^sláinte 00:13, 19 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi Quad! You made an edit to Hesiod that has baffled me and I have commented on it at the talk page there. I intend reverting your edit unless you can justify it. McZeus (talk) 11:25, 18 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Maleicanhydride.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Leyo 14:22, 8 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

  A deletion discussion has just been created at Category talk:Unclassified Chemical Structures, which may involve one or more orphaned chemical structures, that has you user name in the upload history. Please feel free to add your comments.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 23:03, 10 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi! I'd be very happy if you could help with this request. Particularly with the image which will soon be on wikipedia's mainpage as DYK. Thanks. bamse (talk) 09:40, 18 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks a lot for this high quality image. Will add descriptions and categorize it. Any chance to get more images of the emaki from the same source? If yes, you could also send them by email to: [my username on wikipedia] + "." + "wikipedia" at gmail. bamse (talk) 13:47, 19 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

As for the image you uploaded, do you know something about its source? I am a bit confused because it says here that the object is from 1503 (original emaki is from mid 13th century) and because it has a "fold" which seems to be absent in here or here. Perhaps it is a reproduction on a folding screen!? bamse (talk) 14:08, 19 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi Quadalpha. I read your comment at the deletion discussion of Newco Rangers, and am intrigued. Are you basically saying that you believe there should be one article for the club (old and new in the same article), but then a second article which just covers the liquidation and reformation process? —WFC— 17:34, 15 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi there! Yes, that is what I was suggesting. As other have since pointed out, the new 'club', in the amorphous sociological sense that we mean when we talk about a football club, is very much continuous with the old, despite the high-profile financial hijinks going on at the moment. To put it differently, when people 'support a club', it's not any particular company or other corporate entity that they support, and hence the subject of an encyclopaedia entry should be about the institution that is named by 'Rangers FC', rather than the secondary entities behind it. Or to put it in still another way, there is no reason for the formalistic legal or commercial representation of a particular thing to have precedence, which is why I very much disagree with one of the other comments there ("Strong Keep. I am terribly sorry to all of you mergers and deleters but the basic plain fact is that when a company goes into liquidation it no longer exists. Irrespective of the size of Rangers F.C., it no longer exists even on paper. It's records, trophies and history ended when the club folded."), where the last quoted sentence is quite simply false. There are many things which do not exist 'even on paper', yet still manage to exist in real life. --Quadalpha (talk) 04:01, 18 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

And I've just seen your comment on the AFD page, and I quite agree. Perhaps what we need here is a more nuanced definition of what is a 'club.' --Quadalpha (talk) 04:14, 18 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, Quadalpha. You have new messages at Lova Falk's talk page.
Message added 19:33, 5 May 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

Lova Falk talk 19:33, 5 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Headmasters' and Headmistresses' Conference, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages St Paul's School and Merchant Taylors' School. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 26 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, Quadalpha. You have new messages at Talk:Asclepiades_of_Bithynia.
Message added 18:16, 19 April 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

PriceDL (talk) 18:16, 19 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Carrom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 29 December 2020 (UTC)Reply