Scott3

We're sorry, but your edit has been reverted. This is a rumored title until a reliable source is provided for it being chosen, and your edit did not provide one. Thanks again for your contributions and happy editing! RadioKirk (u|t|c) 00:00, 8 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

What is it you'd like help with? ~Kylu (u|t) 03:59, 12 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

I'm not sure if I need help right now. When put help thing up I forgot to check somthing.--Scott3 21:36, 12 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hi there Scott. I like your proposed policy for science article writers.Blnguyen | rant-line 00:02, 13 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

thanks--Scott3 00:06, 13 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

We already had this discussion here about removing that from the list Talk:The_Sims_2#Editions_of_the_game if you had an objection, please bring it to the discussion rather than warning someone over something that was talked about.--Crossmr 04:29, 14 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

No worries, I just hate to see someone get reamed unnecessarily :)--Crossmr 18:19, 14 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Scott3, thank you for applying for VandalProof. I am happy to announce that you are now authorized for use, so if you haven't already, simply download VandalProof from our main page and install it, and you're all set!

Warning to Vandals: This user is armed with VandalProof

Please join the VandalProof user category by adding either: {{User:Vishwin60/Userbox/VandalProof}} (which will add this user box) or [[Category:Wikipedians using VandalProof]] to your user page.

If you have any queries, please feel free to contact me or post a message on VandalProof's talk page. Welcome to our team! - Glen 13:57, 11 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Sorry.

I deleted the page as it was factually inaccurate and contained personal details (their village) which has lead to him being stalked.

If it can be bettered, I don't mind, but at present it is not good enough to be up.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.139.104.73 (talk • contribs) .

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page. -- Gogo Dodo 00:26, 18 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Dear Scott3

I was left a message stating that my changes to thhe Mercy Ministries page had been reverted.I was wanting to know why.

202.92.102.220

The section is question was deleted because it did not quote a source for your claim that 'Doubts were been raised that Mercy Ministries proceeds were not being used for charity'.I temporarily deleted this section because,unless you quote a source,it cannot be proven to be correct.Making claims like what you wrote in the article may be harmful to the charity if your claim is not proven.

202.92.102.220

why did you erase my message about kurds??

I removed the anthem in the article because it is copyrighted and cannot be freely used in Wikipedia. See the article talk page Wikipedia:Copyrights. Carioca 01:22, 23 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Ok I'll delete the warning message.---Scott3 _{Talk Contributions Count: 950+} 01:42, 23 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. Regards, Carioca 02:00, 23 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hi. You contributed to the discussion at Wikipedia:Protecting children's privacy. If you have the time and interest, I'm asking contributors to past a brief summary of their position on the proposal here, thanks. Herostratus 20:17, 21 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Diggspy.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 15:34, 14 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

i will rape you ;) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.135.46.201 (talk) 00:51, 6 March 2007 (UTC).Reply

The Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to {{inactive}} and/or {{historical}} status. Another proposal is to delete or redirect the project. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU#Inactive.3F and at the deletion debate. Thank you! Delivered on behalf of xaosflux 17:11, 10 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

What do you mean with your suggestion on the talk page of Sabermetrics? You said-"I think an article realted math should to some math. We need a math needed templete." What the Hell does this mean?--68.19.194.143 (talk) 03:12, 24 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Your absurd removal of negative information citing a need to be impartial is absurd, you can apply your logic to any page including Hitler's. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blahblahbuenas (talk • contribs) 07:49, 13 August 2013 (UTC)Reply