Megastrike14

There is no rule on Wikipedia that would restrict me from providing information on individual's ethnicities, as long as reliable sources allow me to do so. You are not fooling anyone by signing in from an anonymous account and removing as many references to anything that says "Azeri" as you can. Given the amazingly high number of warnings for disruptive editing you have been issued, it would be no problem to get you to be sanctioned severely if you persist at doing what you are doing. Consider yourself warned. Parishan (talk) 20:47, 23 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

The word 'Azeri' refers to everyone who belongs to the Azeri ethnicity, Iranian or otherwise. The sources provided for the article Farah Pahlavi also use the word 'Azeri'. You have no right to remove them; this qualifies as vandalism. This is the last warning before you are reported for disruptive editing. This alone is enough to get you reported. Parishan (talk) 04:04, 24 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

May I ask you why you delet always the Azeri background of Iranian Azeris? That is counterproductive. iran is a multi-ethnic country and all Iranians (except a few mainly separatists) are proud of this fact.--Babakexorramdin (talk) 11:16, 24 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

I see it now. You are right we should make it clear that they are not from the republic of Azerbaijan. Therefore we made the article Iranian Azeris, Iranian Armenians, Iranian Georgians, Iranian Kazakhs, Persian speakers of Iran, Iranian kurdistan etc... --Babakexorramdin (talk) 16:12, 24 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

This is a biography of living person and I consider the content which I have deleted to be poorly sourced and potentially defamatory. I believe I have followed guidelines by removing this content. Consult an administrator if you wish. 141.163.196.7 (talk) 00:36, 27 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

The word Azeri/Azerbaijani refers to everyone who belong to the Azeri ethnicity. An Azeri person from Iran who lives in the UK is a British person of Azeri descent. The fact that they are Iranian does not change the fact that they are Azeri. Please stop POV-pushing. Parishan (talk) 04:43, 27 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Frankly, you being Azeri or not is no concern of mine, as it does not excuse you from messing with the articles about ethnic Azeris. In standard proper literary English, "an Iranian of Azeri descent" does not automatically suggest that the person originated from Azerbaijan. It simply means that the given Iranian person is of ethnic Azeri ancestry. There is no reason or proof to state that "an Iranian of Azeri descent" means whatever you perceive it as. Parishan (talk) 19:46, 27 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

I think there is a logic in megastrike's reasoning. An Iranian of Azeri ethnicity is an Iranian Azeri--Babakexorramdin (talk) 02:18, 29 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

So what's the reason for your latest undiscussed page move? cab (talk) 13:49, 29 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Where did you get this?

In October of 2007, Gaahl and Infernus had an undisclosed argument over the future of the band. Using a MySpace bulletin, they announced their splitting up. On October 22, this was the band's official website confirmed that Infernus will be leaving the band, but Gaahl and King ov Hell will continue touring and releasing material under the Gorgoroth name.

Infernus stated in an interview that the main reason (amongst many others) as to why he and Ghaal argued was as to why Ghaal refused to sign the band with Roadrunner Records for their release of their recent studio album: Ad Majorem Sathanas Gloriam when the label offered to have a look at their rough copy of the album. Infernus then explained that Ghaal forced the other band members to agree on signing with Regain Records. Infernus stated that: "Roadrunner are the best label in the world. I was fucked when Ghaal signed us with Regain. That's why the album was so shit."

  Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to India de Beaufort, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Considering your history of being blocked and then continuing with your disruptive editing, it may be appropriate to seek a significantly longer block. JamesBWatson (talk) 22:10, 24 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Hello Megastrike14! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 183 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Emilio Márquez - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Joe Nunez - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 08:27, 25 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Can you please translate this paragraph into Persian for my organization. We are a university organization in the United States and are trying to have our purpose statement translated into many languages of the world.

The purpose of the Global Student Organization shall be to promote interest in issues of global significance, to create better inter-cultural relations, to foster international friendship and understanding, and to provide a forum for the presentation of innovative ideas for the benefit of the University community.

The name of the organization means the Organization of Global Students.

Thank you, --Getoar TX (talk) 08:46, 25 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

  You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Megastrike14. Thank you. –CapitalLetterBeginning (talk) 16:04, 7 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

  This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Iranian Kurdistan, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Your response to accusations that you have used multiple accounts to insert hoaxes based on sources that do not exist, is to continue with that exact same behaviour. Make another edit like that and you will be temporarily blocked, and lose all opportunity to defend yourself in the sockpuppet investigation --- which will undoubtedly result in a permanent block. cab (talk) 14:47, 17 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Please join debateand tell your opinion. This is the actual and very important topic nowadays. We need to keep the info. Thanks in advance... --Shahin Khalilov (talk) 07:20, 23 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Erwin Khachikian has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Epbr123 (talk) 17:02, 12 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Category:Lesbian models, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. KarlB (talk) 03:29, 5 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

 

The article 2009 Cynic and Possessed Tour has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable tour that only has TBA event dates and has been tagged as being unreferenced for almost four years now.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Aspects (talk) 03:21, 21 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Slipknot disambiguation. Since you had some involvement with the Slipknot disambiguation redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. DannyS712 (talk) 06:14, 2 January 2020 (UTC)Reply