AnomieBOT

Title. It did not create today's log, nor is Wikipedia:Categories for discussion#Discussions awaiting closure being updated. (The shutoff page is blank.) Is this a phab:T360488 issue? Best, HouseBlaster (talk · he/they) 03:13, 7 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Looks like some update or other on Toolforge brought down a bunch of the bot's runners and didn't bring them back up again. Restarted. phab:T360488 just makes me have to jump through some extra hoops to do that. Anomie⚔ 11:53, 7 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! Your work with making all the various things AnomieBOT function properly is appreciated, sincerely :) HouseBlaster (talk · he/they) 12:22, 7 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

I think this happened again. Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 September 3 was created by Twinkle, and Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2024 September 3 is red at the time of writing. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 01:52, 3 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Bot restarted. Anomie⚔ 11:24, 3 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Seems to be happening again. Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Old unclosed discussions is not being updated. Best, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 19:47, 12 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, restarted. Seems that things somehow just locked up on Toolforge. Anomie⚔ 00:59, 13 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Stopped again... and apologies for the repeated notes. Your work is appreciated, truly. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 00:57, 17 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Seems like the entire bot got f**ked up. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 01:29, 17 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Seems something on Toolforge took out all the bot's processes. Restarted. Anomie⚔ 11:35, 17 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Looks like the template substing isn't working either, have a few pages that have been autosubst for a few days now that still have transclusions. Primefac (talk) 12:38, 7 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, most of AnomieBOT's tasks had fallen victim to the above. I restarted everything that had failed earlier. It'll take a little while for things to catch up, of course. Anomie⚔ 12:51, 7 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Cool cool. I wasn't sure if the above was an "everything is running" or not. Thanks :-) Primefac (talk) 13:07, 7 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

The bot doesn't seem to have created this today for some reason? 2A0E:1D47:9085:D200:44BF:5DD4:E6F2:E78 (talk) 09:20, 3 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Something on Toolforge seems to have taken out many of the bot's jobs. Bot restarted. Anomie⚔ 11:24, 3 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

AnomieBOT archived an incomplete request from CHUU. I see it was archived because of the {{done}} template, but I've restored the request twice and commented out that template. Even so, the request keeps getting removed. I'd really appreciate it if you could restore it. Thanks! – DreamRimmer (talk) 17:45, 6 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

@DreamRimmer: I think that "commented out that template" is the key here: the bot looks for the string {{done}} and doesn't care if it's in a comment or not (Legobot does something similar with Template:Rfc). You need to do something that causes that string to no longer occur. If you don't want to remove it entirely, the best thing to do is to mark it with Template:Tl or similar, as in {{done}}. Also, if you revert an edit like this, you must also revert the corresponding edit to the archive (they always go in pairs) - Wikipedia:Changing username/Usurpations/Completed/57 now has three copies of the "Azarctic → Quetzal" request. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 20:22, 6 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the response, Redrose64. I am aware that archives always go in pairs, as I regularly archive steward permission requests on Meta and manage archiving in some other venues here as well. I didn't make further edits to fix it because I didn't want to engage in an edit war with the bot, so I thought it would be best for the bot owner to handle it. – DreamRimmer (talk) 01:54, 7 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

This table is crucial to my backlog-shredding routine, what happened? ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 01:15, 17 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Seems the same with ITNCArchiver.—Bagumba (talk) 04:32, 17 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

@AlphaBetaGamma: An up to date list may always be found at the bottom of Category:Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests. That does not depend upon any bots. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 07:27, 17 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Seems something on Toolforge took out all the bot's processes. Restarted. Anomie⚔ 11:35, 17 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Anomie,

It looks like this bot has missed some updates. Just checking in to make sure everything is okay. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:57, 17 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Seems something on Toolforge took out all the bot's processes. Restarted. Anomie⚔ 11:35, 17 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

At some point every month almost without fail, Special:WantedCategories gets hit with at least one redlinked "Wikipedia Today's featured article nominations from Month YYYY" for the current month; the sole apparent exception to this was September, but that was just a temporary delay as Category:Wikipedia Today's featured article nominations from September 2024 showed up on the latest run of that report instead of mid-September, which means I may still get hit with an October category before the end of the month. Essentially, the category doesn't happen right away the moment a featured article request is made, and instead comes to happen when somebody clerking the FA nominations queue tags it with the submission date at closure, which is why it doesn't typically show up at WantedCategories until mid-month.

So, given that it's a category that's routinely expected to exist each month, I previously asked at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests if the people working on that project could just automatically create the category themselves at the start of the month instead of leaving it to become my job to deal with a non-empty redlink — but the only person who replied to me professed not to know what I was talking about as they had never heard of such categories before, and the discussion has now been archived without further action.

So instead I wanted to ask if AnomieBOT could have "Wikipedia Today's featured article nominations from [upcoming month]" added to the list of monthly maintenance categories it automatically creates at each end-of-month rollover? If this is done, it should be created with the {{Tracking category}} tag on it so that it doesn't get deleted prematurely for being empty. Thanks. Bearcat (talk) 18:00, 14 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

(talk page watcher) I didn't know about the thread at WT:TFAR, which I have unarchived to Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests#Categories and replied there. Hopefully some of these people may then understand the issue a bit better. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 20:16, 14 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

I mentioned that category back in Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)/Archive 214#c-Anomie-20240729001000-Bearcat-20240728150400, but no one seemed too interested back then. Looks like, if this would go ahead, some logic in Template:Monthly clean-up category/core would need adjusting to handle the apostrophe output by {{PAGENAME}}, and/or we'd need to decide whether {{Monthly maintenance category}} is really appropriate for the categories. Anomie⚔ 03:15, 15 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Anomie,

AnomieBOT III hasn't issued a report in quite a few hours even though there have been broken redirects to report. Can you "reboot" the bot or whatever is called for? Thanks. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:08, 4 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Looks like something on Toolforge took out all of AnomieBOT's tasks. Restarted. Thanks for the ping! Anomie⚔ 23:32, 4 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Well, thank you for the fix, Anomie! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:07, 5 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

I'm really confused here. This redirect was in Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as dependent on a non-existent page, but the only edit in the page's history was more than two years ago, when the bot created it. Apparently something changed recently, or it would have been deleted as soon as it was created. Anomie, do you want this redirect to be deleted? It's not a G8 candidate because its target exists, but I can G7 it if you wish. Nyttend (talk) 20:30, 7 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

(talk page stalker) the bot uses a template that automatically asks for deletion if the corresponding page with an en-dash doesn't exist. Histor of Peru–Poland relations was deleted by ThadeusOfNazereth, so the bot is now requesting its own redirect be deleted to follow. I wouldn't have done the deletion that started this chain, but I can see why thadeus did and don't blame him. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 20:59, 7 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

So when I viewed the page history of that redirect, it showed up as being created less than an hour ago, which is the main reason I deleted it under R3. I assume now that that's because of the move - Am I correct in thinking that I should have checked the target and fixed the double-redirect instead? ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)^{Talk to Me!} 21:10, 7 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, when deleting a redirect from a move you should check where it was moved to - that's how "recently created" is defined in R3. Your deletion might be justified under the "obviously created in error" part of G6, but I generally prefer to use that rule only when the creator has acknowledged their own error since I can't read people's minds. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 22:39, 7 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

As Pppery noted, the {{User:AnomieBOT/Auto-G8}} template automatically submits the redirect for G8 if the intended target is a redlink. The theory there is that it's extremely likely that any reason for deleting the target (Histor of Peru–Poland relations) would apply to the bot-created redirect as well, in this case that it's an implausible typo. Note this isn't the only place where we have pages that automatically submit themselves for deletion under certain conditions; {{Monthly clean-up category}}, for example, does the same thing when the category is empty and the date is in the past. 13:00, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

Hi, this edit looks pretty bad. Can you avoid substituting Template:WikiProject Musicians while there is a TfD notice on it? I guess there is some cleanup needed here ... — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 21:48, 16 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Looks like you already found that Special:Diff/1257835842 is how to handle that. Anomie⚔ 13:45, 17 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Yes I did. Is there an easy way to find any other pages this was substituted on? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:56, 17 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Searching the bot's contribs for edit summaries mentioning "WikiProject Musicians" since the TFM was added. I already did that via the bot's logfiles; there was only one other which I've reverted. Anomie⚔ 14:05, 17 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Okay that's reassuring, thank you — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 14:07, 17 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi Anomie, it looks like the bot is set to add counties for California geocoordinate requests (example). However, these subcategories were deleted as no longer needed earlier this year, as the backlog has been reduced to almost nothing. Could you adjust the bot so that it just leaves the articles in Category:California articles missing geocoordinate data and doesn't add counties? Many thanks, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:06, 25 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Pi.1415926535: I think you're talking to the wrong bot operator. That edit is by The Anomebot2, not AnomieBOT. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 07:09, 25 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Ack, sorry about that! Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:34, 25 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

* Pppery * _{it has begun...} 22:26, 25 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Looks like Toolforge is having a bunch of problems at the moment. I think I'll have to leave restarting things for later. Anomie⚔ 04:12, 26 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Restarted now. Hopefully it stays up. Anomie⚔ 12:28, 26 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

(talk page watcher) @Pppery: See e.g. phab:T380827. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 08:31, 26 November 2024 (UTC)Reply