44 Gabriel

  Hi, 44 Gabriel. Thanks for patrolling new pages. I've declined your deletion request for a page that you tagged for speedy deletion, because the criterion you used or the reason you gave does not cover this kind of page. Please take a moment to read the new tutorial for patrollers, criteria for speedy deletion, and particularly, the section covering non-criteria. Such pages are best tagged with proposed deletion or proposed deletion for biographies of living persons, or sent to the appropriate deletion discussion. Thanks! 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:E0C1:A3E1:922:144 (talk) 13:51, 28 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Liz. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:58, 21 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi @Liz, why can't these pages that have no history or other affluent pages or anything literally be deleted? There is no rule that allows this, in fact I even wonder if I create an infinite number of redirects if no one is going to delete them the way you have done, even if I have no use for it. Can you help me select or indicate the correct criteria to use? 44 Gabriel (talk) 08:04, 21 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Liz. Why am I going to use test pages or my sandbox if the intention is to delete the same ones that are empty, without tributaries, without history! 44 Gabriel (talk) 08:07, 21 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Vitoria-ASC, you may be blocked from editing. ✗plicit 11:13, 21 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, 44Gabriel. While checking over the Estádio D. Afonso Henriques article, I found that you copied text from an outside source with this edit. That is a copyright violation. I have removed the initial text I've noticed (although there may still be more.) Please do not copy text from other sources. Doing so usually constitutes both a copyright violation and plagiarism. This general rule includes copying material from websites of charity or non-profit organizations, educational, scholarly and news publications, and all sources without a copyright notice. For further information, you should review WP:COPYPASTE. If you have questions, please ask. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 01:26, 6 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

By the way, you wouldn't mind giving your opinion in the discussion of the merger or elimination, whichever is best from the article Estádio D. Afonso Henriques (1965). This is because there were only 3 articles that said that there were 2 different stadiums in Guimarães, when that is not true. However, I put it up for discussion on the Spanish wiki and the merger has already taken place there, on the Dutch wiki a consensus has already been reached and it will be held in the merger soon. However, on the English wiki, no one seems to be interested in this, nor do they even respond. Am I doing something wrong or in the wrong place, at least from what I read they say to have a discussion next to the article, while in the previous two there is a dedicated space for discussion and so it was very simple, convenient and effective!? 44 Gabriel (talk) 10:17, 6 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Good mornig @CactusWriter. What I did was translate the Portuguese article into English, because the article was quite simplistic, or now articles are only translated when they don't exist. In any case, the references are there to prove it. But of course I know that copying paste shouldn't be done and that wasn't the intention. 44 Gabriel (talk) 09:44, 6 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for explaining. That's understandable. For future reference, it's always a good idea to be cautious when copying text from other sources -- including translations from other Wikipedias. Not all Wikis have the same level of oversight and review. I can take a look at the merge discussion and see if I have a qualified opinion on the subject. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 16:44, 6 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi 44 Gabriel. Thank you for your work on Vitória S.C. (water polo). Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

please add a ref to the target page for the water polo team (and the other teams).

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 01:52, 8 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

@MPGuy2824:Hi, what are you referring to, was doing something like I did in this edition?

By the way, you wouldn't mind giving your opinion in the discussion of the merger or elimination, whichever is best from the article Estádio D. Afonso Henriques (1965). This is because there were only 3 articles that said that there were 2 different stadiums in Guimarães, when that is not true. However, I put it up for discussion on the Spanish wiki and the merger has already taken place there, same on the Dutch wiki. However, on the English wiki, no one seems to be interested in this, nor do they even respond. Am I doing something wrong or in the wrong place, at least from what I read they say to have a discussion next to the article, while in the previous two there is a dedicated space for discussion and so it was very simple, convenient and effective!? 44 Gabriel (talk) 09:09, 8 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

• Adding refs: Yup, that's kind of what I meant.
• Merger discussion: You've put it in the right place. It is possible that the folks who comment on most of the merger discussions are off-wiki (or at low-activity). I wouldn't recommend that you close the discussion yourself or do the merger unilaterally, given that there has been some objection. Have patience, more editors will respond eventually. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:36, 8 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

  I think so too, thanks 44 Gabriel (talk) 09:57, 8 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Football in Mozambique, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pemba. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:52, 10 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi, 44 Gabriel. Please note that CSD R3:

• Only applies to recent creations
• Generally does not apply to redirects that are the result of a page move
• Is not merely for redirects you personally view as not worthwhile, but rather for names or misspellings that, as the criterion says, are implausible.

When in doubt, the correct venue is WP:RfD. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe) 02:09, 27 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi,@Tamzin. Ok i will try there, but make no sense when even the title is completely wrong! 44 Gabriel (talk) 02:12, 27 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

I mean 7 similar redirects for what!? 2 or 3 still leaves room for different ways of seeing the article now 7? If there is no more. 44 Gabriel (talk) 02:13, 27 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

That's the kind of argument you're free to make at RfD. It isn't a valid reason for speedy deletion though. Redirects from misspellings and alternate spellings are allowed. R3 is just for cases where the misspelling is very unusual and unlikely to help anyone. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe) 05:40, 27 November 2024 (UTC)Reply