User talk:16@r/Archive 2

  Thanks for uploading Image:Wikirage-logo-long.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 22:45, 8 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Template:Arnold Schwarzenegger has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Wildhartlivie (talk) 16:21, 16 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Just to note i have moved things around so now it redirects to Template:Transport in Europe, which i just created to avoid many redirects and also adds some links. Simply south (talk) 13:48, 20 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Template:Flag of Europe has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Barryob (Contribs) (Talk) 19:35, 20 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Template:Government of Europe has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 00:57, 21 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sorry about that. It appears I have made a mistake and have withdrawn the nomination. See also some comments as Template talk:Government of Europe. Thanks. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 14:51, 21 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

ok, no problem 16@r (talk) 14:52, 21 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Is there any particualr reason your are trancluding this template by creating Template:Flag of Europe Template:Religion in Europe ect rather than linking the template direct in to the article as was the case previously ? . --Barryob (Contribs) (Talk) 12:26, 21 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

I would also like to know if there is any specific reason why you have created several templates having no content, except what was created with Template:Europe topic. --Jhattara ^{(Talk · Contrib)} 13:48, 21 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Please read my answer on the Barryob talk page. 16@r (talk) 13:53, 21 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Ok. So you are changing the template into a meta template, instead of just using the template in the articles by itself. Are you going to do this to every page that links to this template? --Jhattara ^{(Talk · Contrib)} 14:00, 21 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yes 16@r (talk) 14:01, 21 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I notice you are adding Template:Tourism in Europe to multiple articles. But this template does not exist, indeed it was deleted last July. Could I ask you to stop adding this template to articles, please? Adding a non-existent template doesn't improve those articles. Are you planning to recreate the deleted template? It would likely be quickly submitted to a AfD discussion if you do. Thanks, Gwernol 12:50, 21 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Technics.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:18, 24 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Sing365.com requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 18:18, 26 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Sing365.com, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 18:26, 26 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

 

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Excessive, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 22:59, 27 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi,

I noticed you reverted my edit to Internet in Ireland removing the price list. It's good to get some feedback from someone else, However I'd seek justification as to why such a list should be present in Wikipedia. I believe that the information in the list is not notable, and fails What Wikipedia is Not. Additionally, the list can be seen as listcruft: Unfortunately being 'interesting' does not warrant it's inclusion. Perhaps a better way to add this information would be to write a piece in more general terms about pricing of Internet in Ireland. Thoughts?

--gummAY (talk) 03:58, 31 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi; you have tagged a lot of Unix-related pages with {{WikiProject Computer science}}, but note that computer science is about the theoretical aspects of computer programming, not about computer programs or Unix commands. So as far as I can tell, all these tags are out of place. WikiProject Computing is more appropriate. -- intgr [talk] 06:11, 31 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Template:Foundation date is not a template. It's a redirect to a template which "returns a person's date of birth and optionally his/her age". It's obviously meant for people, not companies, websites, foundations or anything else that's not a person. Creating a redirect with an appropriate name doesn't automatically turn the template into one sutable for any of those things. --AussieLegend (talk) 00:01, 1 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

You should check to see if there is a need for an additional template before creating one. If anything, it should probably be an addition to the existing templates. There's no reason why an age conversion can't be done within the template. For example, Template:Infobox Australian Place does a number of conversions such as distance, area etc within the template even though there are existing templates that already do the conversions, eg Template:Convert, because it avoids double processing. The first step would be to discuss the need for age on the various template's talk pages. --AussieLegend (talk) 00:28, 1 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

 

An editor has nominated Welcome to, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Welcome to and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 01:14, 1 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

 

Thank you for uploading Image:AboutUs screenshot.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 18:13, 1 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

I've created the page for you. Good luck! As long as you avoid the problems cited in the AfD, I think you'll do fine. Cheers, Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP!☺} 20:24, 10 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

I'm sorry if I came off as being a bit of a dick there, but there have been several other attempts to recreate thaat page as of late. Anyway, if you would like to clean it up, I can try to help you. However, the first you need is sources. Unfortunately, I don't know of any lists of what language is broadcast in what country. -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 21:11, 10 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi! I was seeing that you was a big responsibility in the changes made in Template:Infobox Software. I'm from portuguese Wikipedia project and I'm making a new template Infobox Software based to our wiki. This is the template: pt:Predefinição:Info/Software2. Apparently all it's Ok, but as you see here, the template is on the front of the article headers, what isn't good. In addition, sometimes the button to edit the header doesn't appears. Excuse-me for the inconvenience, but I doesn't find solution to this problem.

Can you check this for me? I'll be happy if you leave a feedback on my discussion page.

Grateful,

Paulo Ricardo. --201.82.37.240 (talk) 07:10, 11 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

• I'll be replying you in your portuguese user talk page. Thanks for the feedback. ;) --201.82.37.240 (talk) 23:22, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

The previous article had a similar table to what I have deleted. It was the main reason why the article got deleted. That is why I removed it. --Maitch (talk) 13:12, 11 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Thanks for uploading Image:LogoISO.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 01:47, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Template:Mid/doc requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 21:37, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Talk:Main Page is for discussion of the main page only- perhaps try the reference desk, if there's nothing on Nupedia. J Milburn (talk) 00:31, 14 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Re: this edit, please bring up code changes on the talkpage first in cases like this. Whilst it may not be obviously defined anywhere here, css is often used outside of wikipedia, or during database dumps, to remove/change things (in this case, to remove selfrefs). Being bold is good for article content, but in the case of code changes, it's often best to ask first. Thanks :) -- Quiddity (talk) 03:10, 16 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

 

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Comparison of screencasting software, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 06:59, 16 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi! Thanks for updating the page! I still have a concern though, that someone may come to Help me when they really want Crisis hotline -- perhaps we should have a link to that page mentioned somewhere in the disambig page? I'll leave it to you more experienced folks to decide. Glad to see you're still editting! Simesa (talk) 13:34, 17 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Meta-wiki.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:01, 19 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Template:U.S. state disambig requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 20:48, 19 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

I have nominated Category:Television in the United Kingdom to be renamed back to Category:British television and I would ask you do not manually rename any further categories without discussion at WP:CFD. Tim! (talk) 17:35, 21 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Such moves should be made through CFD and not your whim as not everyone will agree with your naming scheme. Tim! (talk) 17:44, 21 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Were you trying to redirect this to something, cause you just redirected it to itself. Which is crazy paradoxical. --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk | Contribs) 17:39, 22 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

List of websites by Alexa rank nominated for deletion. --- RockMFR 07:07, 24 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

 

An editor has nominated List of websites by Alexa rank, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of websites by Alexa rank and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi - What are your intentions as regards this category? I'm not quite sure how it'd be used... Do you mean Category:Disambiguation and redirection templates...? Sardanaphalus (talk) 14:55, 24 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

 

An editor has nominated Internet in Latvia, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Internet in Latvia and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 22:59, 2 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Template:Diplomatic missions of Europe has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Kransky (talk) 12:33, 4 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Template:Capitals by continent (template) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. AllynJ (talk | contribs) 01:11, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Almost every one you created is redundant. --Woohookitty^Woohoo! 07:57, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I really like this template, I think it connects related topics and guides interested readers. I would like to suggest renaming text Web chat site to simply Web chat, also see Talk:Web_chat_site. Cheers - 83.254.215.235 (talk) 01:53, 11 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Your continual restoration of this unproposed (and utterly useless) setup is disruptive. Please stop. Thank you. —David Levy 23:51, 11 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I have nominated Wikipedia (terminology), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia (terminology). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 16:54, 12 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Searchme, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Searchme is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Searchme, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 00:31, 13 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hello. WikiProject Equine is discussing an article importance scale here. Your POV would be appreciated. --Una Smith (talk) 17:17, 16 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Thanks for uploading Image:YouTube.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:15, 17 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Regarding the editprotected category on Category:Templates needing documentation pages: are you simply saying you wish that all those templates had documentation pages? It seems like a make-work project to me; we have traditionally just created the doc pages when there is an actual request for them, rather than creating them out of principle. And it's hard to see why templates like Template:Taxobox_group_v_entry and Template:Turkey-bio-stub need a doc page.

Of course if someone wants to go through and make doc pages I won't discourage them. But I am going to remove the protected edit request category, since it's not a simple, immediate edit to a particular page, but a multi-hour project. Perhaps User:Od Mishehu is interesting in helping, since he is the one who populated the category. — Carl (CBM · talk) 21:43, 19 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I took care of the grading scheme templates, as well, which should have their talk pages redirect to Template talk:Grading scheme. A positive consequence of the category was to show which ones still had individual talk pages. — Carl (CBM · talk) 22:47, 19 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Thanks for uploading Image:Craigslist.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:20, 22 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

It has been suggested to keep "Criticism" as a main term for critics. Can you please take this into account when categorising critic pages? Thank you!--Kozuch (talk) 15:09, 22 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Writing bump requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ninety:one 16:43, 24 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi 16@r,

I noticed that you replaced the explicit list of countries on the Europe topic navbox with ISO country codes. What was your reasoning behind doing this? My concern with the new format regards Russia. By the ISO country code, the proper term is "Russian Federation", but the vast majority of articles about Russia (including the Russia article itself) uses only the term "Russia" in the title, not "Russian Federation". Even if the majority of Russian articles used the term "Russian Federation" in the title instead of "Russia", the way the navbox currently works, the links lack the word "the" (ex. "History of Russian Fedration" instead of "History of the Russian Federation"). You seem to know more MediaWiki language than I do, so any help on addressing this issue would be much appreciated.

Neelix (talk) 00:18, 26 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Wixi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 17:21, 26 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Quite requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Skomorokh 14:40, 28 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hello. In this edit, you add a demographic map to WikiProject: Countering Systemic Bias. I presume this is to point out racial imbalance in world Internet users, as support for that project's stated goals of removing from Wikipedia all perceived racial bias in favour of white people. In that spirit, you may wish also to present this report on how women outnumber men as U.S. Internet users. Perhaps this can similarly be of assistance to WP:CSB in renewing and strengthening their action plan to remove from Wikipedia all perceived gender bias in favour of male people. The WikiProject may find that its call for editors to recruit Wikipedians from women's studies programs in universities may be answered more easily by directing recruiting efforts toward the U.S., given there is such a pool of Internet-savvy women. Blackworm (talk) 01:40, 11 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Could you please say something at Template talk:Surname to explain the reasoning and impact of your recent revision to this template? --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 00:37, 19 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

A template you created, Template:Lang-xx, has been marked for deletion as a deprecated and orphaned template. If, after 14 days, there has been no objection, the template will be deleted. If you wish to object to its deletion, please list your objection here and feel free to remove the {{deprecated}} tag from the template. If you feel the deletion is appropriate, no further action is necessary. Thanks for your attention. --Eleassar ^{my talk} 10:56, 19 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Myself and several other editors have been compiling a list of very active editors who would likely be available to help new editors in the event they have questions or concerns. As the list grew and the table became more detailed, it was determined that the best way to complete the table was to ask each potential candidate to fill in their own information, if they so desire. This list is sorted geographically in order to provide a better estimate as to whether the listed editor is likely to be active.

If you consider yourself a very active Wikipedian who is willing to help newcomers, please either complete your information in the table or add your entry. If you do not want to be on the list, either remove your name or just disregard this message and your entry will be removed within 48 hours. The table can be found at User:Useight/Highly Active, as it has yet to have been moved into the Wikipedia namespace. Thank you for your help. Useight (talk) 06:07, 3 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

 

I have nominated List of Internet service providers, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Internet service providers. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? LegoK^ontribsT^alkM 03:39, 14 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Template:Topic/country doesn't do what you probably think it would do - the article parameter cannot be conditionally passed using that syntax. I was about to fix it, but then I realized that I'm not sure what the expected output should be for some cases. Can you explain what this template is supposed to do? --- RockMFR 01:12, 17 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

I can't say I've seen it elsewhere, but it does seem to serve a purpose as the article does seem to be at odds with the rest of the world, with regards to the English that it uses.Londo06 18:50, 17 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

The new template is great, thanks. The other article I know of that has something like this, and so could use your new template, is motorcycle, for the same reasons, to minimize edit warring and help editors comply with Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style#National_varieties_of_English. -AndrewDressel (talk) 20:35, 17 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Template:AmEng notice has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. –Black Falcon ^(Talk) 05:47, 21 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi,

This may seem to come out of nowhere, but I'm wondering if you could help translating a few pages of English text to French on an online project called Spread Open Media. Though it's not under the Wikimedia Foundation, it shares the same goals towards a world of free culture.

The project has launched this year a German and Spanish counter-parts, and two volunteers were helping to get the French side up, but they have since gone away, leaving the project unfinished. If you'd like to help out, you'll be properly credited for your work.

Regardless of your answer, thank you for your attention.--Ivo ^{talk / contribs} (join Project Portugal) 14:57, 26 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:RapidShare screenshot.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vinhtantran (talk) 07:53, 1 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Thanks for uploading Image:RapidShare screenshot.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 01:05, 4 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Dash Command requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. PseudoChron (talk) 18:13, 5 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Thanks for uploading Image:Google maps logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:56, 20 June 2008 (UTC)Reply