Talk:Tubal

	Georgia (country) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Georgia (country), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Georgia and Georgians on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Georgia (country)Wikipedia:WikiProject Georgia (country)Template:WikiProject Georgia (country)Georgia (country) articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Bible Low‑importance

	Bible portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Judaism Low‑importance

	Judaism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

..and what is the problem identifying all the Iberians as related tribes? afterall two of these groups have reached us today Georgians and Basques do have vast number of ethno-cultural parallels. to say nothing about the linguistic 'anomaly' of Georgian and Basque languages.

Untitled

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

z. sorryz what 'luwian' has to do with tubal? isn't it on the wrong page?. may be move it to Tabal page. actually you have it on both pages and then have 'not to be confused' sign...hmm actually it would be wrong on either one. we need more references proving the linguistic connection of Tubal/Tabal tribes speaking Indo-European Lawinian language. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.212.108.243 (talk) 02:04, 28 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Page in need of overhaul

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This page is in need of an overhaul for several reasons. I'll do part of the necessary work, but I'm leaving this note for anyone else who might want to pitch in. There's a number of issues snarled together. First, there's the problem of missing citations. That can be chipped away at, reference by reference. A problem that will require larger edits is organization. As it stands now, the article makes no attempt to differentiate (1) views about Tubal held by scholarly, reliable sources, from (2) speculation about Tubal recorded by tons of medieval people with no particular expertise in Ancient Near Eastern scholarship. Right now, the text is divided into two big sections based on the date that various opinions on Tubal were expressed. However, the first section "early theories" contains some opinions from as late as the twentieth century, while the second section "later historical identifications" contains some opinions from as early as the first century. The two sections, because they are divided solely on the basis of chronology, should have parallel names. While "early theories" is a decent name, "later historical identifications" could mislead an unwary thinker into thinking that he has now come to the part of the article that contains scholarly opinions. He would be wrong to think this.Alephb (talk) 21:49, 12 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tubal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110726010152/http://www.jon-ruthven.org/rosh.pdf to http://www.jon-ruthven.org/rosh.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:42, 11 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic