Talk:Denver metropolitan area

According to the most recent Update of Statistical Area Definitions and Guidance of their Usage, Dated Nov. 20, 2008, found here http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/assets/omb/bulletins/fy2009/09-01.pdf , Broomfield has been added as a principal city to Denver-Aurora, CO Metropolitan Statistical Area. The new name is the Denver-Aurora-Broomfield, CO Metropolitan Statistical Area.

This is correct, but the naming convention has changed once again. According to the 2014 version of the OMB definitions, the area is now named Denver-Aurora-Lakewood, CO Metropolitan Statistical Area. see definitions here — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.242.0.29 (talk) 13:12, 22 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

I added Fort Lupton, Colorado as part of the metro area. I think it could be included. On maps of the metro area they always show Fort Lupton.

--*--

Actually, Fort Lupton is officially in the Greeley Metropolitan Area because it is located in Weld County. Fort Lupton, Dacono, Frederick, and Firestone are all quite close to the Adams-Weld county boundary. As a practical matter, these towns are Denver suburbs, even though they are officially in a different metro area.

Paul 14 November 2006

Why is it the Denver-Aurora Metropolitan area? I'm a native of it, and this is the first time in my life I've seen Aurora attached to Denver-Metro. I've seen Denver/Boulder area, but never Denver-Aurora area. Ken 21:28, 24 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

That is the official Census Bureau designation, as the first line of the article reads: "The Denver-Aurora Metropolitan Area is defined by the United States Census Bureau as a ten-county..." One or more "principal cities" are defined by the Census Bureau for each metropolitan area, and each of these principal cities appears in the name. I don't know what criteria are used to determine whether a city merits "principal" status, but certainly population is one of them. Aurora now has approximately 300,000 people and is among the 60-or-so largest cities in the country. Boulder, by the way, is now defined as part of the separate Boulder Metropolitan Area. Denvoran 21:52, 24 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

I think a note should be added that no one generally considers the area "Denver-Aurora". I read an article somewhere that Aurora will someday pass Denver in population, mainly since Aurora can keep expanding East while Denver is limited since it is surrounded, but not until around 2020 or 2030. It was probably in the Rocky Mountain News or Denver Post. --Mecu 21:14, 12 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

I agree 100%, and since it is opinions we are talking about I will share mine. No one calls the area Denver-Aurora, no one is proud of Aurora and therefore no one wants to hear the name. The Area comprising Superior to Golden to Littleton to Highlands Ranch to Parker to Aurora to DIA to Northglen to Broomfield to Louisville is Greater Denver or Denver-Metro, that is the clear boundary. The only real debate is whether to include Louisville and Superior. Since 1990 Parker has been officially in. No Castle Rock, no Boulder and certainly no Longmount. I have lived here all my life, and have been running around the entire Denver Metro for the last 7 years. Denver-Boulder area is very useful becuase it describes this larger than greater Denver Area.

Like most metropolitan areas in the United States, the extent of the Denver Metropolitan Area is largely contextual and the subject of lively debate.

Most Colorado counties are extensive. The three suburban counties adjacent to the City and County of Denver are long and narrow, with high population densities at the end of county near Denver and very low population densities at the opposite end:

• Arapahoe County is 72 miles long and 4 to 12 miles wide.
• Jefferson County is 54 miles long and 4 to 18 miles wide. (The southwest corner of the county is a wilderness area.)
• Adams County is 72 miles long and 6 to 18 miles wide.

There are several overlapping, officially designated Denver metropolitan regions:

• Denver Core Metropolitan Area – 4 counties with 2,013,234 population.
• Denver Central Metropolitan Area - 6 counties with 2,306,128 population.
• Denver Region of the Denver Regional Council of Governments – 9 counties with 2,600,697 population.
• Denver-Aurora Metropolitan Statistical Area – 10 counties with 2,359,994 population.
• Denver-Aurora-Boulder Combined Statistical Area – 12 counties with 2,869,377 population.
• North Central Colorado Urban Area - 13 counties with 3,141,304 population.
• Front Range Urban Corridor – 18 counties with 4,013,055 population.

There are many other unofficial and quasi-official definitions of the Denver Metropolitan Area.

The Denver-Aurora Metropolitan Area article started life as a Denver Metropolitan Area article. While the label Denver Metropolitan Area is almost universally used in the metro area, the name of the article was changed to Denver-Aurora Metropolitan Area to coincide with the United States Census Bureau designated Denver-Aurora Metropolitan Statistical Area. Unfortunately, the Census Bureau also designated a Denver-Aurora-Boulder Combined Statistical Area. The definition of the Denver Region used by the Denver Regional Council of Governments is the most common used locally.

I recommend that the Denver-Aurora Metropolitan Area article be retained (and possibly renamed to the more popular Denver Metropolitan Area) for general information about Metropolitan Denver. The portions of the article that deal with a specific regional entity such as the Denver-Aurora Metropolitan Statistical Area or the Denver Regional Council of Governments should be moved to those articles.

--Buaidh 22:54, 30 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

The Denver-Aurora Metropolitan Statistical Area includes communities such as Alma, Fairplay, Hartsel, Guffey, Lake George, Simla, and Matheson that few locals would consider to be part of the Denver Metropolitan Area, while excluding cities like Boulder, Louisville, Lafayette, and Erie that most locals do consider to be part of the Denver Metropolitan Area.

The Denver-Aurora Metropolitan Statistical Area also splits the Town of Superior with the Boulder Metropolitan Statistical Area and splits the City of Northglenn, the City of Thornton, the City of Brighton, and the Town of Lochbuie with the Greeley Metropolitan Statistical Area.

--Buaidh 20:40, 9 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Lafayette-Opelousas-Morgan City, LA Combined Statistical Area which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 23:47, 12 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Denver-Aurora-Lakewood, CO Metropolitan Statistical Area. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20041204091948/http://www.raqc.org:80/LG%20Communicators/lg%20fact%20sheet%20092204.pdf to http://www.raqc.org/LG%20Communicators/lg%20fact%20sheet%20092204.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:14, 2 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Denver metropolitan area. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121114040524/http://www.census.gov/popest/data/counties/totals/2011/tables/CO-EST2011-01-08.csv to http://www.census.gov/popest/data/counties/totals/2011/tables/CO-EST2011-01-08.csv
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120618125907/http://www.drcog.org/index.cfm?page=InternationalPartnersforPeace to http://www.drcog.org/index.cfm?page=InternationalPartnersforPeace
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.census.gov/popest/estimates.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:43, 9 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

The Air quality section currently says:

The RAQC hopes to implement plans enabling the area to comply with the new [ozone] standards by 2007.

Is someone able to bring this up to date? Thanks! Msramming (talk) 19:09, 1 May 2018 (UTC)Reply