Template talk:Circular reference

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Inline Templates, a collaborative effort to improve and manage Wikipedia's inline footnote, cleanup and dispute templates. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
Some discussion of this template may take place at the project's talk page, rather than here.Inline TemplatesWikipedia:WikiProject Inline TemplatesTemplate:WikiProject Inline TemplatesInline Templates

Needed?

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Why do we have this tag? If it's a circular reference, it should be deleted. If an editor is knowledgeable enough to tag it, wouldn't they also be knowledgeable enough to delete it? It takes as much, if not more effort to tag it than delete it. Jason Quinn (talk) 03:34, 11 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

It makes sense if the editor thinks that the tagged fact might be verifiable through other means, and is requesting for someone to find additional references. If that is possible, the fact should not be deleted. Diego (talk) 09:37, 4 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Own tracking category

Latest comment: 9 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Currently this template categorizes pages in the generic "Articles lacking reliable references" categories. Any objection to giving it its own subcategory? It seems like this particular type of ref problem could easily be triaged, such as by verifying and importing a ref from the cited WP article, converting to a {{cn}} if the cited WP article does not support it, or converting to a bluelink of the text itself depending on the context. DMacks (talk) 03:46, 18 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic