User talk:Freoh: Difference between revisions
m WP:RPA |
|||
Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
::That's a general answer; I was looking for a more specific answer. Is there a particular edit you want to make right now if you could? [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 15:44, 4 March 2024 (UTC) |
::That's a general answer; I was looking for a more specific answer. Is there a particular edit you want to make right now if you could? [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 15:44, 4 March 2024 (UTC) |
||
:::Yes, I would like to leave a farewell message at [[User talk:Larataguera]], who seems to have left the project dispirited a few months after I was forced out. We were both trying to counter systemic bias on Wikipedia, and I had a lot of positive interactions with them. I hope to encourage them to return at some point.  — <span style="font-variant:small-caps">[[User talk:Freoh|Freoh]]</span> 17:58, 4 March 2024 (UTC) |
:::Yes, I would like to leave a farewell message at [[User talk:Larataguera]], who seems to have left the project dispirited a few months after I was forced out. We were both trying to counter systemic bias on Wikipedia, and I had a lot of positive interactions with them. I hope to encourage them to return at some point.  — <span style="font-variant:small-caps">[[User talk:Freoh|Freoh]]</span> 17:58, 4 March 2024 (UTC) |
||
::::{{rpa}} [[User:Display name 99|Display name 99]] ([[User talk:Display name 99|talk]]) 21:58, 4 March 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::::{{tq|after I was forced out}} You weren't forced out. You were given a partial block because many editors were annoyed with you because, among many other things, you seemed to have given yourself a role of some sort unofficial "Wikipedia policeman," going around unsolicited to editors' talk pages unsolicited and redacting their comments without justification or authority to do so instead of focusing on improving content. The decision to quit editing entirely was your own. As for "systemic bias," the fact that you did not receive an indefinite block, and just got the last block partially overturned, despite making it clear that you are editing for ideological purposes, is proof that the systemic bias that you speak of works in the opposite direction that you seem to think it does. I am proof of that. [[User:Display name 99|Display name 99]] ([[User talk:Display name 99|talk]]) 21:58, 4 March 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:02, 4 March 2024
This is a Wikipedia user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. |
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 4 December 2023
- In the media: Turmoil on Hebrew Wikipedia, grave dancing, Olga's impact and inspiring Bhutanese nuns
- Disinformation report: "Wikipedia and the assault on history"
- Comix: Bold comics for a new age
- Essay: I am going to die
- Featured content: Real gangsters move in silence
- Traffic report: And it's hard to watch some cricket, in the cold November Rain
- Humour: Mandy Rice-Davies Applies
The Signpost: 24 December 2023
- Special report: Did the Chinese Communist Party send astroturfers to sabotage a hacktivist's Wikipedia article?
- News and notes: The Italian Public Domain wars continue, Wikimedia RU set to dissolve, and a recap of WLM 2023
- In the media: Consider the humble fork
- Discussion report: Arabic Wikipedia blackout; Wikimedians discuss SpongeBob, copyrights, and AI
- In focus: Liquidation of Wikimedia RU
- Technology report: Dark mode is coming
- Recent research: "LLMs Know More, Hallucinate Less" with Wikidata
- Gallery: A feast of holidays and carols
- Comix: Lollus lmaois 200C tincture
- Crossword: when the crossword is sus
- Traffic report: What's the big deal? I'm an animal!
- From the editor: A piccy iz worth OVAR 9000!!!11oneone! wordz ^_^
- Humour: Guess the joke contest
The Signpost: 10 January 2024
- From the editor: NINETEEN MORE YEARS! NINETEEN MORE YEARS!
- Special report: Public Domain Day 2024
- Technology report: Wikipedia: A Multigenerational Pursuit
- News and notes: In other news ... see ya in court!
- WikiProject report: WikiProjects Israel and Palestine
- Obituary: Anthony Bradbury
- Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2023
- Comix: Conflict resolution
The Signpost: 31 January 2024
- News and notes: Wikipedian Osama Khalid celebrated his 30th birthday in jail
- Opinion: Until it happens to you
- Disinformation report: How paid editors squeeze you dry
- Recent research: Croatian takeover was enabled by "lack of bureaucratic openness and rules constraining [admins]"
- Traffic report: DJ, gonna burn this goddamn house right down
The Signpost: 13 February 2024
- News and notes: Wikimedia Russia director declared "foreign agent" by Russian gov; EU prepares to pile on the papers
- Disinformation report: How low can the scammers go?
- Serendipity: Is this guy the same as the one who was a Nazi?
- Traffic report: Griselda, Nikki, Carl, Jannik and two types of football
- Crossword: Our crossword to bear
- Comix: Strongly
The Signpost: 2 March 2024
- News and notes: Wikimedia enters US Supreme court hearings as "the dolphin inadvertently caught in the net"
- Recent research: Images on Wikipedia "amplify gender bias"
- In the media: The Scottish Parliament gets involved, a wikirace on live TV, and the Foundation's CTO goes on record
- Obituary: Vami_IV
- Traffic report: Supervalentinefilmbowlday
- WikiCup report: High-scoring WikiCup first round comes to a close
Return from exile?
Hi Tamzin, I would like to return to Wikipedia, but first I need to better understand your rationale for banning me. You criticized me for actions that I took in an attempt to improve Wikipedia's somewhat toxic culture, and I thought that everything I was doing was well within the bounds of the policies and guidelines. You accused me of stirring drama
, but I am still unclear how editors are supposed to resolve user conduct disputes without others finding such confrontation disruptive. I hope to once again be a productive contributor to the project. — Freoh 00:51, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Freoh. I am no longer an admin, and am not participating in administrative discussions. You can submit an unblock request through the normal system. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe) 03:15, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Freoh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I believe that I was mistakenly blocked. An administrator blocked me for stirring drama
and declined to explain further. My intention was and is to productively contribute to Wikipedia and encourage a civil atmosphere of collaboration. I have heeded prior advice from administrators and focused on content for the most part. Banning editors who express minority opinions simply because other editors respond with personal attacks is counterproductive. — Freoh 13:03, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Accept reason:
Let's try a trial run here. I have restored your access to the user talk namespace, that's what you wanted to do right now and hopefully that won't be too controversial. If that goes well, you may request unblock for the other spaces. 331dot (talk) 21:36, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
You are only blocked from the user talk, Wikipedia, and Wikipedia talk namespaces. What edits do you need to make in those namespaces? 331dot (talk) 13:58, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- 331dot, I plan to use those namespaces in the same ways that other editors use them, similarly to how I used them before my expulsion: encouraging newcomers, contributing to consensus in centralized discussions, politely reminding others of the civility policy, awarding barnstars, removing personal attacks, et cetera. — Freoh 14:31, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- That's a general answer; I was looking for a more specific answer. Is there a particular edit you want to make right now if you could? 331dot (talk) 15:44, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I would like to leave a farewell message at User talk:Larataguera, who seems to have left the project dispirited a few months after I was forced out. We were both trying to counter systemic bias on Wikipedia, and I had a lot of positive interactions with them. I hope to encourage them to return at some point. — Freoh 17:58, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- That's a general answer; I was looking for a more specific answer. Is there a particular edit you want to make right now if you could? 331dot (talk) 15:44, 4 March 2024 (UTC)