User talk:Duffbeerforme

Archives

/Archive 1. /Archive 2. /Archive 3. /Archive 4. /Archive 5. /Archive 6. /Archive 7. /Archive 8. /Archive 9. /Archive 10. /Archive 11. /Archive 12

No personal relationship exists between any editor on the article. your application of random templates is unwarranted and presented with no evidence. The opinion about a properly referenced primary sourced block-quote is discussed on the talk page and has no consensus for removal. It is also not policy. Please stop this activity. I will look for the NPOV that you have called out.

I hope to work with you on the project under different circumstances soon. All my best User:Lightburst 15:03, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This reply proves Lightburst is a liar. Lightburst claimed that he had taken a personal photograph of said individual at their wedding while above he claimed no have no personal relationship. Lying about taking that photo showed it was yet another copyright violation by Lightburst, complete with a false claim of ownership of someone else's work. To hide his latest violation Lightburst proceeded to rename his account, make false accusations of outing and slander others whilst giving them no avenue of redress. He also did the equivalent of taking his bat and ball and going home. The above article no longer exists because after rudely and aggressively claiming clear notability of said subject he proceeded to call himself a liar and nominated the article for deletion on the grounds of non notability. duffbeerforme (talk) 13:27, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Duffbeerforme,

Just a reminder, when you tag a page for any type of deletion (CSD, PROD, AFD/RFD/CFD/etc.), it is advised that you post a notification on the talk page of the page creator. This is typically done by making use of Twinkle, an editing tool used by almost all page patrollers and most administrators. Once you set up your Twinkle Preferences to "Notify page creator", when you tag a page for deletion using Twinkle, the program will post a notification on your behalf. Twinkle has a lot of other handy features, you can tag articles for problems they contain, report vandals to noticeboards, welcome editors, post talk page warnings for all sorts of issues, Twinkle will even maintain deletion logs for you if you'd like to keep track of those things. I encourage you to try it out. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:40, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have a weird obsession with Eric West. If his role was minor, he was all over TV promoting it. They send out actors to promote minor roles?

https://www.instagram.com/p/CXT_M0LuA8l/

Get a life. 192.121.112.68 (talk) 18:12, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK Eric, keep trying to convince yourself. duffbeerforme (talk) 04:15, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, if you're going to revert any edits, as you did on Dylan Clarke, please have a civil or sensible reason for doing it, saying it's "bs" or "bull s#!t" or using any other expletive language is not reasonable.

The fact of the matter was that it was such a very embarrassing loss for Carlton which resulted in Brendon Bolton losing his job, and Patrick Cripps would be held liable for his abysmal performance.

On that end, I would also like to know which AFL club you support, if any. If it was Carlton, I would not be surprised. Avatar5991 (talk) 00:13, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, if you're going to revert any edits, as you did on Dylan Clarke, please have a civil or sensible reason for doing it, reverting just because an edit summary says "bs" or "bull s#!t" is not reasonable.

I had a very sensible and reasonable reason. The claim was bull shit. It was not supported by the source. The source simply did not mention Clarke. That one loss alone did not result in Bolton's sacking. Clarke's performance was not the sole reason for Carlton's poor performance (amongst other things 7 Bombers had more possessions than the best performing Blue, Clarke was not one of them). You can't just make shit up and put it in. If sources claim that the go for it but don't put original research into Wikipedia.

More importantly why did you revert me? Why did you choose to reinsert false information back into the article? Why did you reintroduce a challenged and unsourced claim into a BLP? Was it simply because I (didn't) swear? Seems like a stupid move if that's the case. duffbeerforme (talk) 00:39, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Duff. There was, as you no doubt know, a solid consensus at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2023 April 1 for overturning the speedy deletion of List of Parkruns in the United Kingdom and related articles, so I have closed the review accordingly. You may like to take the articles to AfD, or someone else may, since several other editors expressed support for doing so. I have no personal view as to whether the articles should be deleted or not. JBW (talk) 18:22, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sent by NPP Coordination using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I was offline for a few days. Regarding your query at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Kee (lawyer), yes, Rick570 was exactly the editor I was thinking of. Schwede66 04:50, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for confirming that. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:56, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wanna take a look at the Stagestruck afd? I added some reception. Cheers, Ouro (blah blah) 13:35, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Duffbeerforme, our group, WikiProject Australian television, is currently recruiting additional editors to help edit the large project that is Australian TV. I was wondering whether you might consider joining us, since you work on Australian TV-related articles anyway. If you are interested, please add your name to the list of active participants, and see our list of open tasks. All the best, Lotsw73 (talk) 12:48, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Duffbeerforme,

Please use Twinkle to tag pages for any type of deletion (CSD, PROD, AFD/RFD/CFD/etc.). This will not only leave a descriptive edit summary but once you set your Twinkle Preferences to "Notify page creator", then Twinkle will post a notification on the talk page of the editor who created the page which is an important step in the deletion process. It's important to inform content creators when articles (or redirects, templates or categories) that they created are headed for deletion and the reason why. Most page patrollers and many admins use Twinkle daily because it makes editing so much easier, basically it has all of the templates you might need so you don't need to search for the appropriate one. It will allow you to easily tag articles for problems, report vandals to noticeboard, keep logs of your deletion tagging, welcome new editors, do so many tasks. I encourage you to try it out. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:19, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Rahel Romahn has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Actor with mostly small roles in various tv shows, was nominated for 2 awards in 2016 (unclear to me if this alone makes him notable or not, the AACTA nomination appears to be the reason the article was created in the first place).

Going off the Notability (people) guidelines he appears to not be notable.

First time doing this, apologies if I did something wrong.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abandonee (talk) 19:20, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your DRV request was malformed. You replaced the example format with your DRV request and left it inside the comment delimiters. I've moved it for you, and added your name and time stamp to the request. -- Whpq (talk) 14:07, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Duffbeerforme:, could you please create an article for Australian actor Mitchell Hope, who is best known for appearing as main character Ben on the Descendants film franchise and in the film Let It Snow alongside Kiernan Shipka? CheAjlt (talk) 16:21, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I'm not an expert on Azalia Snail, but I'm generally interested in the part of the music world in which she's notable, and while visiting her page I noticed the flag you'd posted suggesting there may have been undisclosed editing for pay. This was five years ago, and I don't see anything on the talk page elaborating on the alleged problem or discussing it in any way. I'm wondering what the upshot of this is—whether something explaining the flagging could be added to the talk page (if you still recall the details after all this time); or, alternatively, the flag can be removed if this was a false alarm. Thanks! Jcejhay (talk) 17:17, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do not add personal information about other contributors to Wikipedia without their explicit permission. Wikipedia operates on the principle that every contributor has the right to remain completely anonymous. Posting personal information about another user is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's harassment policy. Wikipedia's policy on this issue is strictly enforced and your edits have been reverted and/or suppressed, not least because such information can appear on web searches. Wikipedia's privacy policy is to protect the privacy of every user, including you. Persistently adding personal information about other contributors will result in being blocked from editing. I redacted your use of what you believe to be an editor's real first name. Don't do that again. Levivich (talk) 16:07, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• No Levivich. I did not post anything that he himself had already posted. He gave his full name, a self portrait, etc. His name is still publicly visible. duffbeerforme (talk) 23:02, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, just letting you know you forgot to sign your comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ginny Holder (2nd nomination). Best, -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 14:26, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, done now. duffbeerforme (talk) 05:27, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed your comment on the Mark Diamond AfD. I suggest that you strike your allegation of UPE unless you have evidence. There may be a conflict of interest (discouraged but permitted) without reason to conclude such a person was paid. And there are just super-fans who want someone they don't know to have their own article.

Arbcom has said An editor must not accuse another of misbehavior without evidence, especially when the accusations are repeated or severe. If accusations must be made, they should be raised, with evidence, on the user-talk page of the editor they concern or in the appropriate forums. Of course, this isn't repeated or particularly severe by AfD terms but I suggest you take that message to heart. Oblivy (talk) 04:40, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have added the sources you cited to her article, but I cannot access some of them. Could you add more detail about those? (They are the ones under the heading "Further reading"). Thanks! -- Ssilvers (talk) 08:57, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Barbara Stephens (actress), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Warming Up.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just a reminder that if you come across a bad or incomplete article and choose to draftify it, you also need to either disable or remove any categories that were on the page at the same time — drafts can't be in categories per WP:DRAFTNOCAT, so if you don't disable or remove the categories, then you're just making more work for other people. Thanks. Bearcat (talk) 14:03, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you want to sign your edit you just made. [1]. LibStar (talk) 03:42, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done, thanks. duffbeerforme (talk) 03:47, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]