Talk:Rangekeeper

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Military history: Maritime / Technology / Weaponry / British / European / North America / United States / World War I / World War II This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Maritime warfare task force Military science, technology, and theory task force Weaponry task force British military history task force European military history task force North American military history task force United States military history task force World War I task force World War II task force

A very parochial article.

Naval gunnery was following the developments in coast artillery gunnery in the second half of the 19th century. Development of AA gunnery starting in WW1 was also rapid and involved tachymetric instruments, with some significant French developments.Nfe (talk) 05:21, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I like the technical details on how these machines worked, but I'm missing information on the companies involved. The Picture caption says "Ford Mk 1 Ballistic Computer" Is this Heny Ford's Automobile Company, or another Ford? Are there any other companies or government agencies involved in its development? --BjKa (talk) 14:25, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

www.kristalqq.vip Anisakey1 (talk) 13:39, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I keep reading about "computing gunfire solutions", but how were the guns actually fired? I can see some pistol grips of the firing triggers in the FordMk1Rangekeeper.jpg. (I know them for what they are from my visit to USS New Jersey.) Was it usual for someone to hold a trigger in his hand or was it usual to have them "docked" at the console, as pictured, when actally firing? Did the machine fire the guns automatically at the correct moment? Or did the machine tell an operator when to pull the trigger? Or did an operator trigger a firing command and the machine then executed the command at a calculated moment? Or something totally different altogether? --BjKa (talk) 14:25, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This page, is pretty much just a history of US range keeping, with a few honourable mentions for the british and the japanese getting pastings, what about the sophisticatec rangekeeping the germans had? Needs a globalise template, like this:

The examples and perspective in this article may not represent a worldwide view of the subject. You may improve this article, discuss the issue on the talk page, or create a new article, as appropriate. (October 2016) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Agree, so reassessed B-2 criteria as "no". DPdH (talk) 13:10, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]