Talk:Dominion theology

This article is written in British English with Oxford spelling (colour, realize, organization, analyse; note that -ize is used instead of -ise) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Christianity: Theology / Reformed Christianity Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by theology work group. This article is supported by WikiProject Reformed Christianity (assessed as Mid-importance). Politics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The contents of the Dominionism page were merged into Dominion theology on 6 September 2013. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.

Archives

1

This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

Even if a citation is found, I think it's irresponsible to spread the view of dominion theology as "Christian Sharia" in the article's lead, as Sharia is the Muslim equivalent of Jewish Halakha and, like Halakha, does not necessarily imply theocracy - though Halakha does influence Israeli law and many Middle Eastern governments base themselves on Sharia. You can certainly say Halakha inherently demands theocracy, but most Jews don't view it that way, and many Muslims do not see Sharia that way; the issue is extremely complex and there is too much simplistic misinformation about it being spread by the far right. Any mention of comparisons to Sharia should be made further down in the article, IMO, and should be given as citations from particular notable individuals. Finsternish (talk) 20:06, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. I've removed the language. --BlueMoonlet (t/c) 16:02, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ironically this point is in the article explaining what domininism is.

It expressly states that dominionism is more often interpreted to be something more liberal than a code of sharia, but that some people accept as such.

So that is PERFECTLY analogous to sharia or halakajfa or whatever. Wigglewortz (talk) 08:43, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Dominion theology's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "unreasonable":

• From Integralism: Schwartzman, Micah; Wilson, Jocelyn (2019). "The Unreasonableness of Catholic Integralism". San Diego Law Review. 56: 1039–.
• From Mortara case: Schwartzman, Micah; Wilson, Jocelyn (2019). "The Unreasonableness of Catholic Integralism". San Diego Law Review. 56: 1039–1041.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 13:10, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Christian Sharia and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 9#Christian Sharia until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 02:07, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Christian Taliban and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 1#Christian Taliban until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 23:30, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]