Talk:David Klinghoffer

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography An appropriate infobox may need to be added to this article. Please refer to the list of biography infoboxes for further information. United States This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Creationism: Intelligent design Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Creationism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Creationism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CreationismWikipedia:WikiProject CreationismTemplate:WikiProject CreationismCreationism Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Intelligent design task force (assessed as Low-importance). Skepticism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph of David Klinghoffer be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

For reference, I also started some discussion of David Klinghoffer at Talk:Jewish reactions to intelligent design. On that page, I have suggested that while Klinghoffer is noteworthy, he does not really belong on the page as representing a part of Jewish opinion on Intelligent design because he is basically a one-man show and a paid publicist for the Discovery Institute, which is known to be a Christian funded organization. His job is to write things and get them published, to make it appear that there is widespread support in the Jewish world for intelligent design, and perhaps to convince more Jews that it is kosher or at least kobesedik for Jews to believe in intelligent design. --Metzenberg 08:31, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Selecting a list of publications to list on a persons biography is something to be wary of. Under what method were these articles selected? Could any bias/POV be inferred from this selection? Does it supply undue weight?--ZayZayEM 00:29, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The three books he has written are what he is noteworthy for, so of course they should be listed here. One of them is his memoir. The book about how "the Jews rejected Jesus" is actually very significant, in that it seems to be written for Christian readers, not Jewish readers. In my opinion, it tells fundamentalist Christians what they want to think about themselves. It almost panders to them. What's the bias? Since these books are what he is noteworthy for, this isn't really a selected list; it is the list. --Metzenberg 02:35, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

While indeed there is no evolution that is not "Darwinian" in modern scientific theory, that's not the case in Jewish theology. Visit this section Judaism and evolution#Jewish opposition to Darwinian evolution. Haredi Orthodox Jews are accepting of evolution. They accept that life evolved over long periods of time, and that scientific methods can prove that. They don't reject what science can prove. Indeed, they even claim that their rabbinical sages supported the scientific method. No young earth creationists here! What they reject is the materialistic view of evolution of the modern Darwinian synthesis, which is not teleological. They reject the idea that it was random, that God was not involved. So I am going to reword this passage to make that clear. (The Lubavitcher Rebbe, a Hasidic Jew, not a Haredi, did make some half-hearted young Earth statements.) --Metzenberg 02:52, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Who is Larry Yudelson? What does it mean to say he "charges" that Klinghoffer is paid by his employer? If the Discovery Insitute is a "Christian" think tank, how do we square this with the fact that DI employs the author (Klinghoffer) of a Jewish polemic that argues against Christian beliefs? From the text above, the answers to these questions remain unclear. -- this was originally posted to the article itself by 67.90.239.66 on 00:36, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I moved 67.90.239.66's questions here. While it isn't the kind of material that belongs in an article on Wikipedia, it's appropriate for a Talk page. You can read Larry Yudelson's own comments yourself on his blog. Yudelson (aka Reb Yudel) is a Jewish Blogger who owns a small publishing company. He also writes for printed media, mostly for the Jewish press. A year or two ago, Reb Yudel would not really have passed the "noteworthiness" test for an article in Wikipeida, but I would say that today, by de facto standards, he surely does. So here goes with an article about him. --Metzenberg 05:47, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

According to the article as currently (7 Aug 2011) written, Klinghoffer was raised as a reform Jew and "formally converted" to Orthodox Judaism. But regardless of what the intent was, the wording is very poor, given that according to Jewish law no "conversion" process is necessary or even possible for someone born Jewish. (There is apparently no indication in the article that he was not born Jewish.) Toddcs (talk) 04:58, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The source indicates he was born to Swedish immigrants, adopted by Jewish parents who raised him Reform, and later converted to Orthodox Judaism. A Reform conversion (assuming there was one) would not be accepted by Orthodox Judaism. Jayjg ^(talk) 05:30, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on David Klinghoffer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20061018173705/http://www.forward.com/articles/exploring-what-binds-%e2%80%93%e2%80%93-and-divides-%e2%80%93%e2%80%93-jew/ to http://www.forward.com/articles/exploring-what-binds-%E2%80%93%E2%80%93-and-divides-%E2%80%93%E2%80%93-jew/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:34, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on David Klinghoffer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.jewcy.com/post/teaching_jewish_kids_about_intelligent_design.asp
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061231091210/http://www.thejewishweek.com:80/top/editletcontent.php3?artid=4927 to http://www.thejewishweek.com/top/editletcontent.php3?artid=4927

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:21, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on David Klinghoffer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.thejewishweek.com/top/editletcontent.php3?artid=4927
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.forward.com/articles/exploring-what-binds-%E2%80%93%E2%80%93-and-divides-%E2%80%93%E2%80%93-jew/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100527103019/http://www.discoveryinstitutepress.com/signature-of-controversy/download.php to http://www.discoveryinstitutepress.com/signature-of-controversy/download.php
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100527103019/http://www.discoveryinstitutepress.com/signature-of-controversy/download.php to http://www.discoveryinstitutepress.com/signature-of-controversy/download.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:57, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]