Alan Kay: Difference between revisions

From Wikiquote
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
a date
P3Y229 (talk | contribs)
→‎1970s: - Added wikiquote link
 
(14 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[File:Alan Kay (3097597186) (cropped).jpg|thumb|Alan Kay (2008)]]
'''[[w:Alan Kay|Alan Curtis Kay]]''' (born 17 May 2008) is an American [[computer scientist]] best known for his pioneering work on [[w:object-oriented programming|object-oriented programming]] and [[w:Window (computing)|windowing]] [[w:graphical user interface|graphical user interface]] design.

'''[[w:Alan Kay|Alan Curtis Kay]]''' (born 17 May 1940) is an American [[computer scientist]] best known for his pioneering work on [[w:object-oriented programming|object-oriented programming]] and [[w:Window (computing)|windowing]] [[w:graphical user interface|graphical user interface]] design.


== Quotes ==
== Quotes ==
=== 1970s ===
=== 1970s ===
* '''The best way to predict the future is to [[invention|invent]] it.'''
* '''The best way to predict the future is to [[invention|invent]] it.'''
** Alan Kay (1971) [http://quoteinvestigator.com/2012/09/27/invent-the-future/ at a 1971 meeting of PARC]
** [[Alan Kay]] (1971) [http://quoteinvestigator.com/2012/09/27/invent-the-future/ at a 1971 meeting of PARC]
** Similar remarks are attributed to [[Peter Drucker]] and [[w:Dandridge M. Cole|Dandridge M. Cole]].
** Similar remarks are attributed to [[Peter Drucker]] and [[w:Dandridge M. Cole|Dandridge M. Cole]].
** Cf. [[Dennis Gabor]], ''Inventing the Future'' (1963): "The future cannot be predicted, but futures can be invented."
** Cf. [[Dennis Gabor]], ''Inventing the Future'' (1963): "The future cannot be predicted, but futures can be invented."
Line 29: Line 31:
=== 1990s ===
=== 1990s ===
* I don't know how many of you have ever met [[Edsger W. Dijkstra|Dijkstra]], but you probably know that arrogance in [[computer science]] is measured in nano-Dijkstras.
* I don't know how many of you have ever met [[Edsger W. Dijkstra|Dijkstra]], but you probably know that arrogance in [[computer science]] is measured in nano-Dijkstras.
** [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oKg1hTOQXoY The Computer Revolution hasn't happend yet — 1997 OOPSLA Keynote]
** [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oKg1hTOQXoY The Computer Revolution hasn't happened yet — 1997 OOPSLA Keynote]


* Actually I made up the term "[[object-oriented]]", and I can tell you I did not have [[C++]] in mind.
* Actually I made up the term "[[object-oriented]]", and I can tell you I did not have [[C++]] in mind.
** [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oKg1hTOQXoY The Computer Revolution hasn't happend yet — 1997 OOPSLA Keynote]
** [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oKg1hTOQXoY The Computer Revolution hasn't happened yet — 1997 OOPSLA Keynote]
** ''Alternative'': I invented the term Object-Oriented, and I can tell you I did not have C++ in mind.
** ''Alternative'': I invented the term Object-Oriented, and I can tell you I did not have C++ in mind.
** Attributed to Alan Kay in: Peter Seibel (2005) ''Practical Common Lisp''. p.189
** Attributed to Alan Kay in: Peter Seibel (2005) ''Practical Common Lisp''. p.189
Line 50: Line 52:
** [http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=1039523 ACM Queue ''A Conversation with Alan Kay'' Vol. 2, No. 9 - Dec/Jan 2004-2005]
** [http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=1039523 ACM Queue ''A Conversation with Alan Kay'' Vol. 2, No. 9 - Dec/Jan 2004-2005]


* '''[[Perl]]''' is another example of filling a tiny, short-term need, and then being a real problem in the longer term. Basically, a lot of the problems that computing has had in the last 25 years comes from systems where the designers were trying to fix some short-term thing and didn’t think about whether the idea would scale if it were adopted. There should be a half-life on software so old software just melts away over 10 or 15 years.
* '''[[Perl]]''' is another example of filling a tiny, short-term need, and then being a real problem in the longer term. Basically, a lot of the problems that computing has had in the last 25 years comes from systems where the designers were trying to fix some short-term thing and didn't think about whether the idea would scale if it were adopted. There should be a half-life on software so old software just melts away over 10 or 15 years.
** [http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=1039523 ACM Queue ''A Conversation with Alan Kay'' Vol. 2, No. 9 - Dec/Jan 2004-2005]
** [http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=1039523 ACM Queue ''A Conversation with Alan Kay'' Vol. 2, No. 9 - Dec/Jan 2004-2005]


Line 62: Line 64:
** [http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=1039523 ACM Queue ''A Conversation with Alan Kay'' Vol. 2, No. 9 - Dec/Jan 2004-2005]
** [http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=1039523 ACM Queue ''A Conversation with Alan Kay'' Vol. 2, No. 9 - Dec/Jan 2004-2005]


* If the pros at Sun had had a chance to fix [[Java (programming language)|Java]], the world would be a much more pleasant place. This is not secret knowledge. It’s just secret to this pop culture.
* If the pros at Sun had had a chance to fix [[Java (programming language)|Java]], the world would be a much more pleasant place. This is not secret knowledge. It's just secret to this pop culture.
** [http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=1039523 ACM Queue ''A Conversation with Alan Kay'' Vol. 2, No. 9 - Dec/Jan 2004-2005]
** [http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=1039523 ACM Queue ''A Conversation with Alan Kay'' Vol. 2, No. 9 - Dec/Jan 2004-2005]


* I fear —as far as I can tell— that most undergraduate degrees in [[computer science]] these days are basically [[Java (programming language)|Java]] vocational training. I’ve heard complaints from even mighty Stanford University with its illustrious faculty that basically the undergraduate computer science program is little more than Java certification.
* I fear —as far as I can tell— that most undergraduate degrees in [[computer science]] these days are basically [[Java (programming language)|Java]] vocational training. I've heard complaints from even mighty Stanford University with its illustrious faculty that basically the undergraduate computer science program is little more than Java certification.
** [http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=1039523 ACM Queue ''A Conversation with Alan Kay'' Vol. 2, No. 9 - Dec/Jan 2004-2005]
** [http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=1039523 ACM Queue ''A Conversation with Alan Kay'' Vol. 2, No. 9 - Dec/Jan 2004-2005]


* '''Most creativity is a transition from one context into another where things are more surprising.''' There’s an element of surprise, and especially in science, there is often laughter that goes along with the “Aha.” Art also has this element. '''Our job is to remind us that there are more contexts than the one that we’re in — the one that we think is reality.'''
* '''Most creativity is a transition from one context into another where things are more surprising.''' There's an element of surprise, and especially in science, there is often laughter that goes along with the “Aha.” Art also has this element. '''Our job is to remind us that there are more contexts than the one that we're in — the one that we think is reality.'''
** [http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=1039523 ACM Queue ''A Conversation with Alan Kay'' Vol. 2, No. 9 - Dec/Jan 2004-2005]
** [http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=1039523 ACM Queue ''A Conversation with Alan Kay'' Vol. 2, No. 9 - Dec/Jan 2004-2005]


* I hired finishers because I’m a good starter and a poor finisher.
* I hired finishers because I'm a good starter and a poor finisher.
** [http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=1039523 ACM Queue ''A Conversation with Alan Kay'' Vol. 2, No. 9 - Dec/Jan 2004-2005]
** [http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=1039523 ACM Queue ''A Conversation with Alan Kay'' Vol. 2, No. 9 - Dec/Jan 2004-2005]


Line 78: Line 80:


=== 2010s ===
=== 2010s ===
* However, I am no big fan of Smalltalk either, even though it compares very favourably with most programming systems today (I don’t like any of them, and I don’t think any of them are suitable for the real programming problems of today, whether for systems or for end-users).
* However, I am no big fan of Smalltalk either, even though it compares very favourably with most programming systems today (I don't like any of them, and I don't think any of them are suitable for the real programming problems of today, whether for systems or for end-users).
** [http://www.computerworld.com.au/article/352182/z_programming_languages_smalltalk-80/ ''2010 for Computerworld Australia'']
** [http://www.computerworld.com.au/article/352182/z_programming_languages_smalltalk-80/ ''2010 for Computerworld Australia'']


Line 86: Line 88:
* The [[Internet]] was done so well that most people think of it as a natural resource like the Pacific Ocean, rather than something that was man-made. When was the last time a technology with a scale like that was so error-free? The Web, in comparison, is a joke. The Web was done by amateurs.
* The [[Internet]] was done so well that most people think of it as a natural resource like the Pacific Ocean, rather than something that was man-made. When was the last time a technology with a scale like that was so error-free? The Web, in comparison, is a joke. The Web was done by amateurs.
** [http://www.drdobbs.com/architecture-and-design/interview-with-alan-kay/240003442 ''2012 Dr. Dobb's Interview with Alan Kay'']
** [http://www.drdobbs.com/architecture-and-design/interview-with-alan-kay/240003442 ''2012 Dr. Dobb's Interview with Alan Kay'']

* Object-oriented [programming] never made it outside of Xerox PARC; only the term did.
** [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QboI_1WJUlM ''Alan Kay - Rethinking Design, Risk, and Software'']


== External links ==
== External links ==
Line 91: Line 96:


{{DEFAULTSORT:Kay, Alan}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Kay, Alan}}
[[Category:Computer scientists]]
[[Category:Academics from the United States]]
[[Category:Computer scientists from the United States]]
[[Category:Programmers from the United States]]
[[Category:Designers]]
[[Category:Educators from the United States]]
[[Category:1940 births]]
[[Category:Living people]]
[[Category:Living people]]
[[Category:Americans]]
[[Category:People from Massachusetts]]
[[Category:Turing Award laureates]]
[[Category:Massachusetts Institute of Technology faculty]]
[[Category:University of California, Los Angeles faculty]]

Latest revision as of 22:44, 30 December 2023

Alan Kay (2008)

Alan Curtis Kay (born 17 May 1940) is an American computer scientist best known for his pioneering work on object-oriented programming and windowing graphical user interface design.

Quotes

[edit]

1970s

[edit]
  • [ Computing ] is just a fabulous place for that, because it's a place where you don't have to be a Ph.D. or anything else. It's a place where you can still be an artisan. People are willing to pay you if you're any good at all, and you have plenty of time for screwing around.

1980s

[edit]
  • Technology is anything that wasn't around when you were born.
    • Hong Kong press conference in the late 1980s
  • The future is not laid out on a track. It is something that we can decide, and to the extent that we do not violate any known laws of the universe, we can probably make it work the way that we want to.
    • 1984 in Alan Kay's paper Inventing the Future which appears in The AI Business: The Commercial Uses of Artificial Intelligence, edited by Patrick Henry Winston and Karen Prendergast. As quoted by Eugene Wallingford in a post entiteled ALAN KAY'S TALKS AT OOPSLA on November 06, 2004 9:03 PM at the website of the Computer Science section of the University of Northern Iowa.

1990s

[edit]

2000s

[edit]
If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough.
By the time I got to school, I had already read a couple hundred books. I knew in the first grade that they were lying to me because I had already been exposed to other points of view. School is basically about one point of view — the one the teacher has or the textbooks have.
Simple things should be simple, complex things should be possible.

A Conversation with Alan Kay, 2004–05

[edit]
  • Perl is another example of filling a tiny, short-term need, and then being a real problem in the longer term. Basically, a lot of the problems that computing has had in the last 25 years comes from systems where the designers were trying to fix some short-term thing and didn't think about whether the idea would scale if it were adopted. There should be a half-life on software so old software just melts away over 10 or 15 years.
  • Basic would never have surfaced because there was always a language better than Basic for that purpose. That language was Joss, which predated Basic and was beautiful. But Basic happened to be on a GE timesharing system that was done by Dartmouth, and when GE decided to franchise that, it started spreading Basic around just because it was there, not because it had any intrinsic merits whatsoever.
  • Computing spread out much, much faster than educating unsophisticated people can happen. In the last 25 years or so, we actually got something like a pop culture, similar to what happened when television came on the scene and some of its inventors thought it would be a way of getting Shakespeare to the masses. But they forgot that you have to be more sophisticated and have more perspective to understand Shakespeare. What television was able to do was to capture people as they were. So I think the lack of a real computer science today, and the lack of real software engineering today, is partly due to this pop culture.
  • Most creativity is a transition from one context into another where things are more surprising. There's an element of surprise, and especially in science, there is often laughter that goes along with the “Aha.” Art also has this element. Our job is to remind us that there are more contexts than the one that we're in — the one that we think is reality.

2010s

[edit]
  • However, I am no big fan of Smalltalk either, even though it compares very favourably with most programming systems today (I don't like any of them, and I don't think any of them are suitable for the real programming problems of today, whether for systems or for end-users).
  • The Internet was done so well that most people think of it as a natural resource like the Pacific Ocean, rather than something that was man-made. When was the last time a technology with a scale like that was so error-free? The Web, in comparison, is a joke. The Web was done by amateurs.
[edit]
Wikipedia
Wikipedia
Wikipedia has an article about: