User talk:SiobhanHansa

I'm rarely onwiki these days but please leave messages for me here and I'll try and respond as soon as I see them. - Siobhan

I move messages to the archive when there appears to be no more movement on a discussion and I'm bored enough to clean up this page. If I've archived too hastily, feel free to move an item back to this page, or just pickup here without the context.

• Archive thru December 2007

• Archive January 2008 onward

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 12:16, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:25, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:33, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:34, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 12:57, 28 July 2009 (UTC) [reply]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 06:12, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 05:35, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 04:11, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 06:19, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SiobhanHansa. The links I'm inserting in the Algarve article do meet the guidelines for external links. algarvedigital.pt is an official government entity which controls the tecnology in that area, including all the municipal websites and internet connection between them. observatoriodoalgarve.com is the Reuters of Algarve, the source of all news from that region. --Xaman79 (talk) 16:25, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New reply for you here. --Xaman79 (talk) 13:09, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hope all is well and you are rested... best wishes --BozMo talk 21:43, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Could you have look at the article please? The same IP that gave you spam trouble is back. This time rather persistant and slightly smarter.--Kmhkmh (talk) 19:16, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. After a month of semi protection the IP was right back, starting the same game. I#d appreciate if you take a look as well.--Kmhkmh (talk) 20:14, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

SiobhanHansa, Hi! The Angel investor article could you use some of your input. Things have been going along as usual, until this week when a [to my mind] over-zealous spam assassin with the user name Ronz decided that 100% of the external links on Angel investor were spam, and therefore wholesale deleted them. Since you, I and the other regular editors have been religious about curating those links for several years, I was a bit taken aback, and left a nice note on Ronz's page explaining what we've been doing, and why I reverted the wholesale deletion. Ronz took exception to my explanation, and has tagged the article, posting a note on the article's talk page claiming that we are all wrong, and that none of the links comply with wikipedia policy and they should all be removed. I obviously strongly disagree with Ronz's actions and assessment, particularly because we have worked so hard to come to a consensus over three years as to what links are appropriate for this article and have, among us, done such a good job of keeping that section clean. Given your own anti-spam wiki-cred, I would appreciate it if you could stop by the Angel investor talk page and weigh in with your opinion. Thanks! Yorker (talk) 23:26, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:GeorgeFoundationLogo.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:18, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider removing our site biblewalks.com from spam blacklist. It is one of the leading web sites on the Holy Land and we hope it can be de-blacklisted, and adhere to Wikepedia's spam rules. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Biblewalks (talk • contribs) 10:03, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider removing our site biblewalks.com from spam blacklist. It is one of the leading web sites on the Holy Land and we hope it can be de-blacklisted, and adhere to Wikepedia's spam rules. Biblewalks (talk) 10:05, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is PlayFair (facilitation). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PlayFair (facilitation). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:13, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Compassion UK requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Theleftorium ^(talk) 17:12, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's been almost three years since I drafted a page for virtual volunteering and you put a conflict of interest/neutral point of view warning on the article. More than 20 people have now edited this article, many of the references on the page are not my own, more than 20 other entries link to it... Surely it's long overdue to remove the conflict of interest tag on this article? -- Jcravens42 17:40, 30 December 2010 (UTC-8)

Siobhan, I just proposed that we move price comparison service to comparison shopping engine. I noticed you've been involved with the page before, so you may want to join the discussion. Take care! —Neil 07:46, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Jessica Taylor (The Platters). Since you had some involvement with the Jessica Taylor (The Platters) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Anomalocaris (talk) 05:04, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:GeorgeFoundationLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited CoppaFeel!, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page C-word. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]