User talk:SafariScribe
SafariScribe is currently experiencing significant stress that may affect their ability to work on Wikipedia. They may choose to work in quieter areas and avoid complicated tasks or areas prone to conflict. They may also respond to talk page or email messages more slowly than usual, and your patience is greatly appreciated. Thank you. |
Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
6 November 2024 |
|
Resources for maintenance and collaboration |
---|
Cleanup |
Categories |
Create an article |
Referencing |
Stubs |
Deletion |
Polishing |
Translation into English |
Images |
Controversy |
To-do lists |
Disambiguation |
More |
|
For a listing of ongoing discussions, see the dashboard. |
This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated. |
The world was created for all.
No one is perfect even AI's do mis fault. Stay cool, just alert me and I will see it off!
— SafariScribe
If you are here just to castigated me (I know there shouldn't be "d", so it's a mistake; fix it yourself), please don't come here. Find anywhere in your talk page, then ping me for opinion. Welcome to my talk page, and ask questions as you will answer when it's thrown to you. I have no other account and have never edited for any payment whatsoever.
A month ago we talked about an article I wrote. I am a paid contributor. I'm trying to follow all the guidelines and you helped me with that. I added some part to make it more impartial, talking about criticism. This article has already been previously approved by @Qcne. Can you check and see if you can exit drafts again?
Hello. Thanks for suggestions. I want to clarify that I am not related to company. I have used Anime News Network as source mutiple times because it is considered a reliable entertainment website in anime community and is used in multiple articles as sources. Additionaly, I fixed references by adding additional third party as well as sources from company itself. Request to recheck the article if it can be submitted now. Thank You. Coolduckbird (talk) 07:47, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- We dont need citations to the film, we want sources that tells us about the film and how it was produced including the works of the producing company. Here the studio enters. I hope you do understood? Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 10:37, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- The article I made is about the films and tv series made by The Answer Studio. Detailed information of the films as wiki pages are not yet available because not enough articles are made since they are not very famous and most of them are catered towards kids. Although Imdb pages are availabe but it is not a reliable source. I think they are notable enough because they have significant coverage,WP:NEXIST. When other animation studios like Wit Studio started, initially they had just Attack on Titan, but it was notable enough to be made an article of the company. Thank you. Coolduckbird (talk) 11:13, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for the suggestions, I have improved the draft. Coolduckbird (talk) 05:55, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Hello @SafariScribe, could you plz check if the draft is better now? Coolduckbird (talk) 08:50, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
the article you are telling me that it already exist is a whole different person and the one I am publishing about is another person, kindly review my article and let it b publish
thanks
Warm regards
Gita Lana (talk) 13:43, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- I have reverted the first rationale, and now, it's declined for lacking sources. I have tagged the ones that needs to be addressed. Cheers! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 22:18, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
Brian Chesky request follow-up
[edit]Hi SafariScribe, I'd left a message here a while ago about a request I made of the Brian Chesky article. I was wondering if you had any thoughts on my response to what you had implemented. If you are curious, The Verge also wrote about it. Cheers PY Airbnb (talk) 14:05, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Maybe I was looking for a better source. Please request again, and ping me, and I would be ready to help. Cheers! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 03:34, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
Please be careful with science AfC
[edit]It can be very tricky to do an AfC review in science. In NPP I looked at a couple you did recently, Radial drift and Nottingham effect. While both might be OK in the end, currently they dont have high quality sources or a wide enough scope. In both cases much more work needs to be done.
I never do an AfC review unless I have a decent knowledge of the area. I think that way reduces the overall load, particularly for second-state specialty area reviewers. Ldm1954 (talk) 18:51, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Ldm1954, thank you for your kind words. I have always appreciated AFC's focus on supporting newbies especially in any area of contributing to WP. I think it helped me when I first joined Wikipedia, and I recalled, even till date, making mistakes, which were used to, in my view, criticise me, although it could have been constructively corrected by other editors. I even considered leaving the project due to frustration, although I know that my departure wouldn't impact the project. It was with that recall that I realised that if an article deserves existence, we must work together to achieve it: a starting point could be accepting it via AFC.Points to cnsider: Before accepting drafts, I research topics on my own to know if it deserves a WP article, and check for sources including ones that aren't listed in the "Ref" section. I feel bad not to have shared some of them (sources) for that particular draft, on the talk page for future improvements. Once again, thank you for your contributions, especially in science. Your work inspires me, hahaha. Although I studied science in high school, I'm currently pursuing philosophy and theology but still read my Physics and Chemistry and Biology, e.t.c. I don't give a move to a draft I don't know about the topic. Cheers! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 20:05, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
Rejection of Donald Boles article
[edit]You rejected my article submission, asking if it was a bio or a company overview, and that's a good question. I think it may be stronger as a company overview, since Boles Aero Manufacturing is one of a handful of mid century trailer manufacturers that still enjoy popularity as collectors items and it would be useful to have a history of the company on Wikipedia. I will rewrite it as such. F18shack (talk) 03:56, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:24, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
Surname Kupffer
[edit]See here
--92.77.57.1 (talk) 14:34, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- That is not a reason my dear. The different versions of Wikipedia, eg German, French, English have different policies guiding notability, and research have, not sure but likely, researched that English Wikipedia has more strict rules than others. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 14:36, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- you can think what you want, but i think it's correct. --92.77.57.1 (talk) 14:38, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
Move just accepted draft?
[edit]Hey @SafariScribe,
I have seen you have recently accepted a draft from AfC, now located at The Shulgin Index, Volume One: Psychedelic Phenethylamines and Related Compounds. Isn't it better if we move it to The Shulgin Index: Volume One, or just The Shulgin Index? I believe it is too long and can be moved. If you have no objection, I am ready to move it.
Thanks ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 08:07, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Done Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 08:16, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 08:16, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
Hi there,
While analyzing the sources, I noticed that you accepted this draft within about six minutes of its creation. Do you have access to The Telegraph? Did you observe that the subject is also the article’s author? Personally, I would have declined it and requested additional references. Please be mindful of your Schumacher's level velocity, as it may not be beneficial to the project. Regards. Hitro talk 19:05, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- There was a tag in the article that indicates the need for sources. Draftifying it appears to be a problem since you could have waited for some hours or even days. Before you start coming here, please did you search for sources, like a WP:BEFORE; because I see WP:SIGCOV. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 23:43, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
Mary Robertson moved to draftspace
[edit]Thanks for your contributions to Mary Robertson. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hitro talk 21:21, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 45, 2024)
[edit] Hello, SafariScribe. The article for improvement of the week is:
Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Space Age • Image Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 4 November 2024 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • |
---|
Mary Robertson moved to draftspace
[edit]Thanks for your contributions to Mary Robertson. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because you may have a possible Conflict of Interest and I believe UPE issue is here. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hitro talk 00:20, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Please I have no COI or UPE. Thanks. @HitroMilanese, why did you draftify an article twice? @Asilvering please intervene. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 00:23, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry @SafariScribe, I didn't get your ping here for some reason. I have reminded Hitro that this is an out-of-process redraftification and should be reversed. -- asilvering (talk) 00:59, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
Hello SafariScribe, this is absolutely wonderful work and feedback! Thank you so much for your work to make Wikipedia what it is today. The wikipedia community is proud to have you!
I have corrected all of your suggestions. It just so happens I was logged in when you left your comment - so I was able to get editing straight away.
Kind regards,
W
Qetuadgjzcbm (talk) 13:55, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
Is YouTube a source?
[edit]Hi SafariScribe, sorry to bother you, but I just wanted to ask, is YouTube a reliable source? Because I see it all over articles (especially music-related ones), and there's a whole template for it and everything. I also observed that for my King of Love article, the citation for Instagram was removed. I guess I kind of see why but I was just curious and wanted to double-check if YouTube was reliable. Cheers! OsigbemheEJB (talk) 03:17, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Please check WP:RSPYT. Cheers! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 03:51, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Creative Planning request
[edit]Hello SafariScribe. Do you have time to review an edit request I posted on the Creative Planning Talk page? You helped me with my previous request about updating the infobox so I thought you might be interested in the topic. No worries if you're busy, though! CreativePlanningAngela (talk) 14:22, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- I am sorry for not responding on time. Vanderwaaalforces seems to have....done the needful. Cheers! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 15:52, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, Vanderwaalforces was very helpful. Genuinely appreciate the assistance I've received so far from Wikipedia editors. CreativePlanningAngela (talk) 18:29, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for loving Wikipedia and her editors; don't forget you're one by all virtue. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 09:31, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, Vanderwaalforces was very helpful. Genuinely appreciate the assistance I've received so far from Wikipedia editors. CreativePlanningAngela (talk) 18:29, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
External links on Kraków Gate in Lublin page
[edit]Hello SafariScribe, could you please point out the external link issue on the Kraków Gate in Lublin page? I browsed the guidelines again, and nothing is clicking. There is one external link on the page, in the references, and it is a reliable source, I think, for the heritage designation alone. That is all it is used for currently. Please respond if it is convenient, and thanks for your help with the page. OldPolandUpdates (talk) 14:28, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- I didn't tag anything, please check the log. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 15:38, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) I checked the history and an external links template was added here [1] by SafariScribe possibly in error I have removed it. Theroadislong (talk) 15:43, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- I am sorry @OldPolandUpdates, that should have been "uncategorized" tag. Cheers! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 09:30, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
Question about my AfC submission: Draft:Fuller GT Magnet Elementary
[edit]Hi. I recently have made a AfC submission that you recently declined- you left a reason that the school is not notable. I have heavily revamped and found references and added them to the text- Do you have any comment on what specifically needs to be added to the article and also what you think of what I recently added? Thanks, ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) Cooldudeseven7 join in on the tea talk 18:11, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- No I don't have, thanks. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 02:38, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Alright, thanks ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) Cooldudeseven7 join in on the tea talk 15:45, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 8
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pietro Sfair, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lebanese.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:57, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
I think the consensus was to restore Kingdom of Albania (medieval), not make it the primary topic over the Zogist state. Srnec (talk) 21:30, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Done thanks! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 02:37, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Corrections in the article by Willfried Segebrecht
[edit]Hi SafariScribe, I have corrected the article according to your recommendations that we wrote about in the message, please check it if it is correct now. As I wrote earlier, I have written permission from the author of the website to use information from the website that I use as a reliable source. Please check, I hope that with your help the project will be accepted. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Willfried_Segebrecht Best regards Grzegorz Gordonwg (talk) 09:10, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:24, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Assistance for the Draft: Beadle Family Massacre (1782)
[edit]yo, earlier today you declined the submission of my article Draft: Beadle Family Massacre (1782) on the grounds of "references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published" I would like to ask you for some assistance on improving my article. Bdblakley29 (talk) 15:27, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Thank you SO much for your help and skill
[edit]Thank you SO much, Safari Scribe, for reviewing my first article: Amikam Toren. I really appreciate you taking the time to do this. Also thank you for cleaning up - and improving - some of the text, and the technical edits you did. It's so great that experienced user's, like yourself, are helping beginners, like me. All the very best x 2025Newbie (talk) 11:48, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- I am happy too. Thanks. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 20:44, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Need advise regarding translated page
[edit]Hello! I need some advise on the following page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Urban_Diary_(Hong_Kong)
which is a translation of the Wiki_zh page: https://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-hk/%E5%9F%8E%E5%B8%82%E6%97%A5%E8%A8%98
It has been declined twice for citation issue, but I have checked the sources and they are from well known news sources and official (government) sources. I wonder what is wrong with them. Thank you. Arutoria (talk) 12:25, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia (s) of every language varies by their policy, e.t.c. That an article was accepted in its Chinese version doesn't mean it would, in English. YouTube is not a reliable source, and seeing your draft, it doesn't appear to meet WP:NORG. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 20:47, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Noted.
- What a shame. I was planning to bring some niche pages from ZH to EN.
- Looks like the plan is on hold now. Arutoria (talk) 14:17, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- No, if there are good articles that meets WP:GNG, you can easily translate them from any language to here. Don't be discouraged my dear. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 21:04, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
Draft: Opera Orlando
[edit]Hey SafariScribe, I hope you are having a great day. I recently submitted an article for publication and wanted to follow up. I had been advised by Memer15151 that using the company website as a source was appropriate, and they confirmed that it would be considered reliable. However, I the article isn't published. Could you kindly advise me on the best course of action moving forward? Thank you for your time and assistance. Bluebox57 (talk) 15:59, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Please link the draft. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 20:48, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Draft:Opera Orlando - Wikipedia Bluebox57 (talk) 21:37, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- CNMall41's comment needs to be addressed, and it says:
At the moment, the majority of the content in the draft is not supported by a reliable source. The information needs to be removed or sourced. See WP:INCITE which will also assist.
Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 21:01, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- CNMall41's comment needs to be addressed, and it says:
- Draft:Opera Orlando - Wikipedia Bluebox57 (talk) 21:37, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Draft: Rocky Reach AVA
[edit]Did you notice the PD-notice for the Federal Register references? I am aware of Wiki's copyright rules, but the Federal Register is public domain as notated and available for publishing its Wikipedia article.
From Federal Register site. "§ 2.6 Unrestricted use. Any person may reproduce or republish, without restriction, any material appearing in any regular or special edition of the Federal Register." Fb2002 (talk) 22:56, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Please link the draft. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 03:47, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 46, 2024)
[edit] Hello, SafariScribe. The article for improvement of the week is:
Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Slow living • Space Age Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 11 November 2024 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • |
---|
Advice on draft: Mary Beth Goodman bio
[edit]Hello there, as a new author who seemingly took on a bigger challenge than expected in drafting a living person’s bio, I would appreciate your advice.
What can I do to get this draft bio of Mary Beth Goodman ready for publication? You recently rejected it and in response I asked questions on the draft’s talk page about alternative sources and why the existing sources are insufficient. Perhaps you can give me more detailed feedback?
The person being profiled has mostly been a diplomat or civil servant so the sources to substantiate her bio are not diverse: they are government sources or other organizations citing the government ones—but it seems editors don’t find those credible. I don’t know how to proceed.
Your help is appreciated. 🙏 Lfdigests (talk) 20:58, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- I will look over, and get back to you. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 21:05, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
RE: Your submission at Articles for creation: Orville Peck bibliography : November 11. 2024
[edit]Dear SafariScribe: although you are an experienced wiki-editor, you misunderstand what constitutes reliable sources. The bibliography article about South African singer Orville Peck comprises citations from the most reliable databases: Scopus, EBSCO and ProQuest. I respectfully ask you to rescind your denial, and approve the bibliography article about Orville Peck. Please note, that there is a separate article about this singer Orville Peck. The criteria for approving Bibliographic articles are different from the criteria for regular articles. PLease see another biblio article, that I worked on before: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Mearsheimer_bibliography . This should give you an example how bibliographic articles are different from regular articles. If you think, that "articles about" -unlike 'articles by"- do not belong to biblio-articles, you need to specify the exact wiki-policy, that state this. As far as I can see, you were wrong in making this distinction. If you understand my arguments, please approve my biblio-article about this amazing South African singer. Walter Tau (talk) 23:00, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Walter Tau, and welcome to my talk page. Unfortunately, I regret to say, "I am not going to accept that draft". Why? Its still a big mess, and most of the contents there aren't verifiable or would likely make a reader interested. To crown it all, another prominent editor has dropped a very important aspect of Wikipedia's "do not", where your draft applies. It is "Wikipedia is not a directory and Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. If people want to know about him or works written about him, they can still browse those sources you've provided there. Thanks for your hardwork though. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 03:09, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Prue Bird Article
[edit]I am very surprised that it was flagged for not worthy of a Wikipedia article when it's a very high profile case in Australia. My links prove that it was covered extensively in the Melbourne News. So I'm very surprised that was flagged. And considering I just reported on the murder of a teenage girl 30 years ago, I am surprised that it could be flagged as not neutral. A website that has long articles about silly memes for this to be flagged as not credible enough seems very surprising and hurtful. And I think I deserve a second chance before I change it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Prue_Bird_Disappearance 365scarlet (talk) 12:47, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Hi and welcome. Try reading HELP:YFA. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 15:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Draft:Elayne Shapiro review
[edit]I really appreciate the quick review! The academic notability source was exactly what I needed, I'm sorry I didn't find it first. Still learning the ropes here, so I appreciate the clear guidance. I'll dig around a bit more to see if there's enough independent coverage to meet the requirements, and if not, try my hand somewhere else. Any other advice is welcome. Grepless (talk) 19:46, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Alright. Please try reading very very well, WP:NACADEMIC. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 15:38, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Jayden Luker
[edit]Sorry but his was a bad mainspace move. He does not meet GNG. GiantSnowman 19:22, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- My bad. Thank you. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 05:42, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
Draft article declined: This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article.
I noticed a key link broken so I updated - covers the organization in a paragraph and footnote. Also added award.
There several interviews (both primary and secondary) that mention the organization in several paragraphs. I saw on another article: "interviews are not inherently unreliable and can present a mix of independent secondary coverage and own statements, and all statements are verifiable consistent with WP:V and WP:RS"
Curious your thoughts on which sources are needed.
Had used wiki article as a guide for sourcing and can't tell how the sources are substantially different: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emily_Segal
Thank you very much. Postcinematicbodies (talk) 04:22, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you and welcome to Wikipedia. Sources should be reliable and may include newspapers and magazines (notable national and international), peer reviewed journals, e.t.c. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 05:44, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
Draft:Jorge Kurchan
[edit]Accpeting Draft:Jorge Kurchan? What were you thinking? Fram (talk) 08:16, 14 November 2024 (UTC)