User talk:Lake Ontario Wind

.

Hi Lake Ontario Wind! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:20, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Canada's Global Markets Action Plan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Business associations. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Venture Capital Action Plan, Lake Ontario Wind!

Wikipedia editor Roches just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Reduced the article to a short statement of facts. It was written like a politically promotional press release, which would make it a candidate for deletion if it was not revised.

To reply, leave a comment on Roches's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Hi, I'm Roches. Lake Ontario Wind, thanks for creating Venture Capital Action Plan!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please link this to a reliable secondary source (major newspapers, ideally).

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Roches (talk) 16:59, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I have added reliable secondary sources.Lake Ontario Wind (talk) 18:37, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Joysanne Sidimus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{Ping|I dream of horses}} to your message. ^{(talk to me) (contributions)} @ 04:37, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

== March 2016 ==

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Rob Ford  with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 19:59, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have shifted to the Mayorship of Rob Ford.Lake Ontario Wind (talk) 20:04, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That is the question. Quis separabit? 21:42, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mayoralty sounds better.Lake Ontario Wind (talk) 13:30, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Rob Ford page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:39, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:INGOT Brokers.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:54, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:INGOT Brokers.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:23, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wayne Gretzky Award is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wayne Gretzky Award until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 15:19, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lake Ontario Wind. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there! I just re-launched the WikiProject Investment.

The site has been fully revamped and updated and I would like to invite you the project.

Feel free to check out the project and ping me if you have any questions.

I'd like to invite you to join the Investment WikiProject. There are a lot of Investment related articles on Wikipedia that could use a little attention, and I hope this project can help organize an effort to improve them. So please, take a look and if you like what you see, help get this project off the ground and a few Investment pages into the front ranks of Wikipedia articles. Thanks!

Cheers! WikiEditCrunch (talk) 19:42, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @WikiEditCrunch:, I will check out and let you know.Lake Ontario Wind (talk) 00:52, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lake Ontario Wind. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,

I noticed you're a member of the Wikipedia Finance and Investment project. I've written a new article and I wonder if you'd be willing to help out by reviewing it - Draft: Fifth Wall Ventures and making it live if you think it's ready? It's a VC-firm focused on real estate with about $200m under management.

Although I am an experienced Wikipedia editor and always try my best to abide by the five pillars, in this case I have a conflict of interest, so Wikipedia policy requires that all my work be reviewed by an independent editor before it's published. (Moved from "Draft" to "Wikipedia" under the "More" tab in the nav.) I'd be glad to do any additional work you think the article requires.

Thanks for considering this!

Ed

BC1278 (talk) 23:29, 1 January 2018 (UTC)BC1278[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	For responding to a request for help and going above and beyond the request to improve the article. BC1278 (talk) 19:09, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@BC1278: Thanks. Lake Ontario Wind (talk) 05:44, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I've noticed you belong to the Wikipedia Private Equity task force and have worked on articles on this subject. I've written a draft article about a prominent VC, User:BC1278/sandbox/Mo_Koyfmanand I wonder if you might have time to review it? I am an experienced Wikipedia editor, and have created many articles, but I have a COI here as a paid consultant to the subject. So, as per WP: COI, all my work must be reviewed and brought live by an independent editor.

I am more than willing to do as much additional work on the draft as you think is required.

Thanks for considering this request!

Ed BC1278 (talk) 21:08, 13 May 2018 (UTC)BC1278[reply]

Hi there. You may remember you reviewed and expanded Fifth Wall Ventures. As the other contributor to this article, I'm notifying you that it's been proposed for deletion at: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Fifth_Wall_Ventures

I have just completed a significant update of the article, to help address notability concerns. It's available here: User:BC1278/sandbox/Fifth_Wall with the new material underlined. All the individual proposed changes/updates are in the Talk section of the main article at Talk:Fifth_Wall_Ventures, since I can't implement them myself due to my conflict of interest. Anyone not conflicted can do a review and update the article.

Thanks!

EdBC1278 (talk) 00:24, 8 June 2018 (UTC)BC1278[reply]

I was asked about the post above here.

The post is a pretty clear violation of WP:CANVASS. Lake Ontario Wind, please read WP:CANVASS and if you decide to participate at the AfD, please consider noting that you were canvassed. (it is better for you to do that, than for someone else to follow your remark and say it for you) Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 14:42, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I understand why it looks like CANVAS, but it is not. After checking the history, I notified all users who contributed to this article, as is appropriate in an AfD, and in this case, this user was the only one who had made edits to the article. I wrote this post intending to ping all users, and then upon checking there was only one. It is a pretty new article. BC1278 (talk) 14:51, 8 June 2018 (UTC)BC1278[reply]

I would advise you not to make the edits as BC1278 requests because they are in contradiction with the community's established practice of WP:Edit requests which is for potentially controversial edits:

1. Propose a specific change on a talk page. Don't add an edit request template yet
2. Once there is consensus for the change, and any final details have been worked out, put a template on the talk page along with a short, clear explanation.
3. A user who can make the edit will notice the template has been added, and will respond to the request.

Dom from Paris (talk) 15:00, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

While I fail to see how adding new sources during AfD can be deemed controversial, there's already a sandbox where all the proposed changes and new sources can be viewed, to make it easier to evaluate the AfD. So that and the list at Talk can suffice. Once again, I pinged every editor who had made edits to the Fifth Wall Ventures article and since it's a new article, only Lake Ontario had made edits to the article.BC1278 (talk) 15:17, 8 June 2018 (UTC)BC1278[reply]

You wrote I have just completed a significant update of the article and also with the new material underlined. and then Anyone not conflicted can do a review and update the article, come on this is getting surreal, in what universe were you just asking them to add new sources? Lake Ontario made edits to the article and moved it at your request so of course pinging them is canvassing! Dom from Paris (talk) 15:28, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I added the suggested new sources -- I wasn't asking Lake Ontario add their own new sources. As the edit request has now been objected to by you, it's automatically controversial and must be discussed on Talk before the edit requests can be implemented, so that's now off the table. It is appropriate to notify all major contributors to an article of an AfD. Where there is only one other major participant, as here, there is only one person to notify. I wish there had been several to show this would have happened, but I can't prove a negative.BC1278 (talk) 16:19, 8 June 2018 (UTC)BC1278[reply]

You do not seem to understand what an uncontroversial edit is. Let me remind you what WP:Edit requests says Uncontroversial changes don't require sourcing, such as correcting typographical errors or disambiguating links.. Just because no one has objected doesn't make it uncontroversial. Dom from Paris (talk) 16:32, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lake Ontario Wind. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lake Ontario Wind. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Daughters for Life Foundation".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 03:33, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Finance & Investment April 2022 Newsletter Hi! Welcome to the April newsletter of WikiProject Finance & Investment. This is our first regular newsletter and has plenty of exciting announcements. You have received this because you added yourself as a participant to the project, but will only receive future newsletters if you sign up for the mailing list; see below for instructions on how to do so. April Drive: The month-long April Content-creation Drive is now underway. The drive's target is to improve Wikipedia's coverage of financial markets. Awards will be given to everyone who improves or creates at least one article in the topic area. Sign up here! New layout: The layout of the WikiProject has been greatly improved, with a navigation bar being added to the top of every page and separate pages for assessment and edit requests, templates, resources, and news. Come take a look! Signing up for the newsletter: To sign up for future newsletters about upcoming drives, recent promotions, and other miscellaneous topics, add yourself to the list at Wikipedia:WikiProject Finance & Investment/Mailing list. You will then receive them in your talk page regularly. Thank you for participating in the WikiProject. A. C. Santacruz ⁂ Please ping me! 22:02, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply] To unsubscribe to this newsletter please go to the mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:32, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Finance & Investment May 2022 Newsletter Hi! Welcome to the May newsletter of WikiProject Finance & Investment. This is our second regular newsletter. You have received this because you have been added to the mailing list; see below for instructions on how to unsubscribe. April Drive finished: The month-long April Content-creation Drive has now concluded. Our first content drive was a great start for what will be a regular feature of our Wikiproject. We will be doing them every other month, so there's none for May, but I look forward to seeing you sign up for the June edition. The drive's target was to improve Wikipedia's coverage of financial markets. Awards were given to those who participated. June Drive topic for discussion: We're currently brainstorming topics for our June Content-creation Drive. Join the discussion here. Content work: Two articles in our purview have received DYK nominations. Real Estate Bank of Arkansas was created and nominated by Hog Farm and Ranchlander National Bank was created and nominated by Sammi Brie. They're currently running in the WikiCup, so good luck to them! UBS has been nominated for a Good article reassessment. If you wish to help, leave comments in the nomination. Thank you for participating in the WikiProject. — Ixtal ( T / C ) ⁂ Join WP:FINANCE! 10:22, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply] To unsubscribe to this newsletter please go to the mailing list page.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:06, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Finance & Investment June 2022 Newsletter Hi! Welcome to the June newsletter of WikiProject Finance & Investment. This is our third regular newsletter. You have received this because you have been added to the mailing list; see below for instructions on how to unsubscribe. June Drive: The month-long June Content-creation Drive is now underway. The drive's target is to improve Wikipedia's coverage of stock exchanges. Awards will be given to everyone who improves or creates at least one article in the topic area. Sign up here! Content work: Two articles in our purview have received DYK nominations. Google Wallet was created and nominated by InfiniteNexus and George D. Gould was created and nominated by Ktin. Ktin is currently running in the WikiCup, so good luck to him! UBS's Good Article Reassessment is still ongoing. If you wish to help, leave comments in the nomination. Cheque was selected as an Article for improvement on May 16 for one week. You can see the improvement during that period here. Thank you for participating in the WikiProject. — — Ixtal ( T / C ) ⁂ Join WP:FINANCE! 07:53, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply] To unsubscribe to this newsletter please go to the mailing list page.

Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:01, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jimmie Lenz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jimmie Lenz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Oaktree b (talk) 20:59, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It looks to me like the AfD for Jimmie Lenz is headed for deletion. I have an opinion on notability, which could be changed. If you want to convince people of notability, then making a policy-based argument is the only way to go. I do not believe that there is any credible case for WP:NPROF, whatsoever. It is possible that there is a case for GNG. This would generally involve finding multiple independent reliable sources covering Lenz, and amounting to WP:SIGCOV. I did not find these on my search, but it is possible that they exist. Passing mentions generally do not suffice. I'd be happy to answer questions about notability criteria.

As article creator, you certainly have the right to !vote. The reason is it often called !voting, however, is that the closing admin is supposed to assess the adherence of arguments to policy. So far, I am not seeing a policy-based argument for Lenz's notability. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 23:29, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I also do not believe that there is any credible case for WP:NPROF but still not sure whether he is non-notable, I tried my best to find published reliable sources about him; I have done my best. I want to leave it for other editors opinions and want to stay away. I have requested the closing admin, if it’s to be deleted, to shift to my user space. Thanks.Lake Ontario Wind (talk) 05:34, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Userifying can be a reasonable thing. A usual reason is when it looks like someone is not yet notable, but is very likely to become notable in (say) 5-10 years; or where a subject is notable but the article is manifestly not ready for main space. You can also leave a polite request to restore to user space at the talk page of the closing admin. Some admins are happy to so restore, others less so. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 07:44, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I will request.Lake Ontario Wind (talk) 09:14, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I’m reaching out because I see you are a project member of Wikipedia:WikiProject Finance & Investment so you might be interested in a proposal about one of the biggest crypto-currency companies in the world. some corrections. Would you possibly be willing to have a look at the items in that proposal? Thanks very much in advance for your time. CertifiedTurtle (talk) 15:54, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]