User talk:Kung Fu Man

Archives

/archive1 • /archive2 • /archive3 • /archive4 • /archive5 • /archive6 • /archive7 • /archive8 • /archive9 • /archive10

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Cindy Aurum you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 04:02, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Cindy Aurum you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Cindy Aurum and Talk:Cindy Aurum/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 20:20, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Cindy Aurum you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Cindy Aurum for comments about the article, and Talk:Cindy Aurum/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 01:42, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that, you are right about it not being dead. I forgot to check the page history and made that judgement based on the fact that the talk page was not being used. QuicoleJR (talk) 19:57, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@QuicoleJR Sorry for the late reply but it's all good man.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 04:46, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there! I hope you're doing well. I don't know if you noticed i recent bit of info i came across regarding Stellar Blade that is also related to P.N. 03. I added it at the talk page of the game's character Vanessa. Just so you know. Have a good day! Roberth Martinez (talk) 15:41, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Cyan Garamonde you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 20:21, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from an image you have uploaded. As noted on the tag itself "Note that if you disagree with the shortcomings of the non-free use rationale as described above, please discuss the matter on the talk page, but do not remove this notice from files you have uploaded." (bolding original). Thank you.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:38, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ponyo: To be fair, anyone that leads with "Hate to be that guy" as a deletion request opener with zero discussion is likely going to get a kneejerk response. I'm sorry I didn't follow protocol all the same, but it's the first time I've run into a speedy on something like that.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 18:41, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I get it, just wanted to make sure you were aware.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:42, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry if we got off on the wrong foot there, Kung Fu Man. Again, I meant no insult by tagging the file, I was just following normal procedure. Please see the FfD. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 19:13, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@TechnoSquirrel69: It's alright, I gave a detailed respond in the FfD discussion, but no hard feelings.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 22:52, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I would like to clear up some things. You've reverted my edits on Furina and Raiden Shogun because "It specifically specifies which are guesses on the part of the staff, and Furina's is not included in that. Can you please stop having a meltdown over this?" Please point out to me which ones are guesses on part of the staff, as the note in the article only states "Most heights are estimated based on in-game comparisons and several ages are based on player speculation. Specific notes are below the chart." Those specific notes do not specify which heights, according to you, are not estimates, and Furina and the Raiden Shogun are included in the same chart as all other current characters.

By the way, 2 edits is not "having a meltdown". Jaguarnik (talk) 18:52, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jaguarnik The Gamer, while yes it's Valnet, still bothers to actually fact check. Granted it's also been a frequently targeted aspect of the article by several IPs, and given how you went about it I assumed that was more of the same, so apologies. That said I apparently misread the bit about most heights being speculative. I still believe that information has an importance in the article to give a proper reference (especially since, to my knowledge this is the ONLY valid reference for such we have), but "approximately" may be better wording with that consideration. Would you accept that along with my apology?--Kung Fu Man (talk) 22:51, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see now. Thank you for the apology, I appreciate it. I can accept "approximately". Jaguarnik (talk) 05:04, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Cyan Garamonde you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Cyan Garamonde for comments about the article, and Talk:Cyan Garamonde/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 23:03, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Shadow (Final Fantasy) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 20:35, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Shadow (Final Fantasy) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Shadow (Final Fantasy) and Talk:Shadow (Final Fantasy)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 00:42, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Shadow (Final Fantasy) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Shadow (Final Fantasy) for comments about the article, and Talk:Shadow (Final Fantasy)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 01:03, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kung Fu Man. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Overwatch".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:10, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Bigdaddy-bioshock.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:10, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Gau (Final Fantasy) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 04:03, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Dizzy (Guilty Gear) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Dizzy (Guilty Gear) for comments about the article, and Talk:Dizzy (Guilty Gear)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of QuicoleJR -- QuicoleJR (talk) 00:41, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Square Enix Barnstar

---

For adding such a significant portion of Final Fantasy characters, both now and in the past. Cukie Gherkin (talk) 13:27, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Eve (Stellar Blade) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Tintor2 -- Tintor2 (talk) 03:41, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Eve (Stellar Blade) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Eve (Stellar Blade) for comments about the article, and Talk:Eve (Stellar Blade)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Tintor2 -- Tintor2 (talk) 15:24, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Gau (Final Fantasy) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Gau (Final Fantasy) for comments about the article, and Talk:Gau (Final Fantasy)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 19:23, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brigitte (Overwatch), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Butch.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I closed the move discussion. If you want me to swap the pages let me know, I am not sure if you were planning to copy and paste it or wanted a swap and history merge. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 00:15, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Zxcvbnm: I just copied everything over and fixed all the links, set up a disambig page there. It can probably be broadened a bit with some of the other Cait Sith's in anime, but I'll leave that for someone else.

Letting you know also because I reckon you usually aren't aware until the new article list hits, but revived Characters of Final Fantasy V and I'm slowly fixing it up. I know that was one you had some disdain for in the past, but I feel there's enough reception now to give it some body, and we have access to the various ultimianias to cut down on the plot cruft steadily. It just seemed weird seeing that big gap on the character list when one of the biggest parts of V's reception is, well, the characters.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 00:40, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kung Fu Man: Well now that it has been improved, I've got no issue with it. Back in 2018 it was almost entirely plot. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 00:58, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article General Leo you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 13:02, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Strago Magus you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 13:02, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited SaGa: Emerald Beyond, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aggregator.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:54, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article General Leo you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:General Leo for comments about the article, and Talk:General Leo/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 18:21, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Strago Magus you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Strago Magus for comments about the article, and Talk:Strago Magus/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 21:01, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article SHODAN you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 01:01, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article SHODAN you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:SHODAN for comments about the article, and Talk:SHODAN/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 15:05, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 6 June 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Eve (Stellar Blade), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Stellar Blade's Eve was described as "a woman born from South Korea's culture and philosophy" by The Washington Post? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Eve (Stellar Blade). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Eve (Stellar Blade)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Z1720 (talk) 00:03, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mai Shiranui you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 19:21, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mai Shiranui you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mai Shiranui for comments about the article, and Talk:Mai Shiranui/GA2 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 02:02, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Honestly a bit overdue given how much we've collaborated, but your work on video game and video game character related Wikipedia articles has been immense, and I'm sure that things would be worse off without you being here. Thank you for all that you have done on Wikipedia. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 00:52, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Street Fighter Seth.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Talim (Soulcalibur) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 03:25, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Setzer Gabbiani you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 03:44, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Exdeath you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of SnowFire -- SnowFire (talk) 06:03, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, although you didn't submit this GA nomination of the article for Snorlax, I noticed that you are a significant contributor. So, I am notifying you are that I am reviewing the article as a courtesy. Thanks, Ca ^{talk to me!} 15:13, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Exdeath you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Exdeath for comments about the article, and Talk:Exdeath/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of SnowFire -- SnowFire (talk) 18:45, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Talim (Soulcalibur) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Talim (Soulcalibur) for comments about the article, and Talk:Talim (Soulcalibur)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 00:05, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Setzer Gabbiani you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Setzer Gabbiani for comments about the article, and Talk:Setzer Gabbiani/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 01:03, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:HazbinHotel-Alastor.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 19:11, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, KFM. In your opinion, what VG character articles do you think have strong gameplay sections? I'm hoping to use them as a guide for future reference. Thanks. 💥Casualty ^{• Hop along. •} 22:45, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@HopalongCasualty: I think Makoto (Street Fighter) has a decent one. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 12:17, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Laura Matsuda you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of QuicoleJR -- QuicoleJR (talk) 16:05, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Laura Matsuda you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Laura Matsuda for comments about the article, and Talk:Laura Matsuda/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of QuicoleJR -- QuicoleJR (talk) 16:23, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Metal Gear series media has ben nominated for speedy renaming to Category:Metal Gear media files. Please see WP:CFDS. – Fayenatic London 19:24, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Raichu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NPC.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:54, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Metal Gear media files indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:18, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, if it's not too much trouble, could you please give a more in-depth explanation as to why sources 6, 7, 14 and this weren't sufficient? I'd like to know what to look out for in the future. Also, would this and this help? SFreader1 (talk) 12:28, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SFreader1: All those sources while they discuss Sunny are strictly doing so in the scope of the game. It's similar to why we don't do character articles based strictly off reviews usually, as for a character article to work you need to illustrate some importance/notability separate from the parent subject. Case in point look at The Narrator for The Stanley Parable, where you can see on the talk page a similar merge proposal occurred and it was put back. It's not that "you need more" and just have to wait for more sources, it's that the foundation isn't going to work at all with what you have to that end. Do you understand now?--Kung Fu Man (talk) 12:44, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks and sorry for bothering. I think I mostly understand, but would this not indicate importance? It largely discusses Sunny's portrayal. This also compares Sunny's portrayal to Danganronpa. Would that count as importance separate from the parent subject? SFreader1 (talk) 12:58, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SFreader1: No, not really. All these refs you keep throwing out are illustrating why Omori is significant, but not an examination or illustration of why Sunny is important separate of that work. You're trying to brute force it by showing "Well they discuss him here!" but missing the context as to why. Discussions about character design for example (that aren't in the greater context of Omori) can illustrate that for example. I get you really want this article out, but there's nothing indicating why it should be separate from the parent work, especially when the reception section as you have it strictly revolves around a lot of how Omori is as a game.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 13:20, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I think I came across as more desperate than I'd intended. I was just trying to clarify because I didn't quite understand. Thanks for being patient. SFreader1 (talk) 13:27, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I still think that there's hope for an article in the future even if there isn't one right now, but do you think that any of the stuff in the draft could be used in the Omori article somewhere? SFreader1 (talk) 13:28, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Sorceress (Dragon's Crown) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Sorceress (Dragon's Crown) and Talk:Sorceress (Dragon's Crown)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 03:24, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Sorceress (Dragon's Crown) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Sorceress (Dragon's Crown) for comments about the article, and Talk:Sorceress (Dragon's Crown)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 04:23, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Kung Fu Man! The article you nominated, Raichu, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Gog the Mild (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:06, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Congrats on the FAC promotion. Aoba47 (talk) 01:27, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Priestess of the Moon has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 28 § Priestess of the Moon until a consensus is reached. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:14, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Mario franchise characters. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. There is no consensus in the discussion you cited, and it has nothing to do with this specific image. ภץאคгöร 15:53, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Nyxaros: Please don't abuse warning templates, you and I both know there was nothing disruptive or unconstructive with that edit other than you exercising WP:IDONTLIKEIT. If you have issue with it, bring it up on the talk page discussion going on the Mario talk page, or feel free to open a discussion at WT:VG or WT:VGCHAR.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 16:28, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How so? You clearly were informed that you should take it to the talk page, not revert once again. And claiming that there is a consensus and WP:EW are OK? ภץאคгöร 16:46, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Being informed of something does not make that information accurate or worthwhile. There was a consensus to have these images changed, and multiple reversions are not disallowed outside of specific user-based restrictions. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 17:27, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Neither does claiming that a consensus has been reached even though the discussion is still ongoing. There never was a consensus to have all the Mario-related images changed. Read the discussion again. There may be soon. Multiple reversions = edit-warring, prevents consensus building, are disruptive. Instead of jumping into the discussion, if you really need to comment, I suggest you comment after checking what is being mentioned. ภץאคгöร 20:56, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple reversions you don't agree with is not up to the standard of disruptive editing. Get some perspective. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 00:15, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I already have. I've stated multiple times above it's about the user falsely claiming that there is a consensus and choosing edit-warring instead of WP:BRD, not about me not agreeing. You should listen to your own advice and perhaps not comment on discussions where you are not contributing to the progress of the discussion/do not know enough about the subject and where it does not involve you. ภץאคгöร 09:01, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Nyxaros: Maybe you should consider cleaning up your attitude. There was no "false claim": I directed you where the discussion was done, and other editors concurred. If you don't like that, there are other avenues to take that. So cool off and get off my talk page.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 09:18, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Nyxaros:I wholeheartedly agree that this warning is inappropriate, and abuse of warning templates it itself disruptive and unconstructive. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 16:41, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The Video Game Barnstar
		For getting Raichu to FA status, bringing the total number of video game character FAs up to 10. QuicoleJR (talk) 16:35, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Leifang you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of QuicoleJR -- QuicoleJR (talk) 14:24, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Leifang you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Leifang for comments about the article, and Talk:Leifang/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of QuicoleJR -- QuicoleJR (talk) 22:21, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Raiden Shogun Cooking Meme.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Di (they-them) (talk) 01:42, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Raiden Shogun Cooking Meme.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Electabuzz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Magmar.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kleavor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kleavor until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 15:48, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Zoroark, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Furry.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Kleavor you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sparkl -- Sparkl (talk) 14:02, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Kleavor you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Kleavor and Talk:Kleavor/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sparkl -- Sparkl (talk) 01:45, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Kleavor you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Kleavor for comments about the article, and Talk:Kleavor/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sparkl -- Sparkl (talk) 17:02, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Meltan you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Fathoms Below -- Fathoms Below (talk) 20:43, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Zoroark you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Nub098765 -- Nub098765 (talk) 06:21, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Zoroark you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Zoroark and Talk:Zoroark/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Nub098765 -- Nub098765 (talk) 08:23, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Zoroark you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Zoroark for comments about the article, and Talk:Zoroark/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Nub098765 -- Nub098765 (talk) 18:21, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Meltan you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Meltan for comments about the article, and Talk:Meltan/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Fathoms Below -- Fathoms Below (talk) 18:43, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jeanette Voerman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roman.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:11, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Where exactly did you get this image? — Ирука¹³ 22:45, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Iruka13: Tekken wikia here. Also I feel we had this discussion before about image sourcing, where the wording I used there is appropriate. I'm getting a strong case of deja vu.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 22:54, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Following this discussion with (Oinkers42), I thought the categories you removed from Galarian Weezing, Galarian Slowpoke, Galarian Mr. Mime, Hisuian Zoroark, Hisuian Voltorb, Hisuian Typhlosion, Alolan Raichu, Alolan Ninetales, Mega Gengar, Mega Pinsir, Mega Mewtwo Y, Mega Mewtwo X, Mega Mawile, Mega Lucario, Mega Gyarados, Mega Gardevoir, Mega Garchomp, Mega Charizard Y and Mega Charizard X were okay. So we should add Category:Fictional fairies to Weezing or Category:Video game characters with ice or cold abilities to Mr. Mime?

There are categories in plenty redirects then that we could get rid of too if we are going by your attitude. Web-julio (talk) 10:36, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would say yes. The Regis for example are a different case because those are separate entities covered by a group article, but Megas end up being more temp transformations. I am a bit on the fence regarding the Alolans, but partly overall why we've been trying to avoid redirects getting general categories is because it rapidly leads to bloat: imagine someone adding categories to every Mario or Zelda enemy redirect with that reasoning, for example.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 17:53, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]