User talk:JimPody

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Prime Minister of Turkey, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dr. K. 10:51, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Name of Turkey into Turkey. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 08:30, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Turkey, you may be blocked from editing. GS ⋙ ☎ 10:53, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Before you try to add sources, I would advice you to read about reliable sources here. Blogs are usually not reliable sources. --T*U (talk) 14:35, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the advice bud

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Turkey. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Dr. K. 17:30, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on Turkey. Thank you. Dr. K. 17:30, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:JimPody reported by User:Dr.K. (Result: ). Thank you. Dr. K. 16:50, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not entirely sure which of your contributions at Turkey are being challenged, but I advise you to start a thread on the talk page Talk:Turkey about them, including the specific text you want to add or remove. If you continue to edit Turkey the way that you have been, you are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. power~enwiki (π, ν) 19:56, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Turkey. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 22:18, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your addition of "Ottoman Empire" in the infobox of Turkey. Actually I happen to agree that it should be there, but this is not the way to achieve it. Wikipedia is based on consensus, which you can read about here. You have recently been blocked from editing for edit warring. The block was intended to make you understand that edit war is not acceptable in Wikipedia. You can read more about edit war here. Please take part in the discussion in the talk page and present your arguments there. Also please remember to sign your talk page comments. Learn about that here. --T*U (talk) 14:48, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on Talk:Turkey. If you continue to make comments like this you will be reported and most likely blocked for personal attacks. Thank you. Dr. K. 21:45, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Roundel shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. BilCat (talk) 17:39, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have several times been asked to learn how to sign your talk page edits. In WP:SIGN you can read about signing: "Comments posted on user talk pages, article talk pages and other discussion pages should be properly signed." Also: "Any posts made to the user talk pages, article talk pages and any other discussion pages must be signed." A little bit down, you can read about "How to sign your posts" (link here). If you do not understand the explanation, please ask for help. If you do understand, please show other editors your good faith by signing all your talk page edits. --T*U (talk) 21:27, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making edits at Turkey that are in opposition to the consensus on the talk page. Any further edits that are obviously in opposition to a consensus on the talk page will result in my filing a WP:AN thread about your conduct on that page. If you have questions, please feel free to respond here, on my talk page, or on Talk:Turkey. power~enwiki (π, ν) 00:28, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry that I forgot to give an edit summary to my edit of 26 November. It should have said "See talk page". I have started a talk page discussion at Talk:Flag of Turkey#Major changes, in order too reach a consensus about the article. There I have explained my reasons and arguments. Please take part in the discussion there. (And when you do, please sign your comments!) --T*U (talk) 17:25, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JimPody. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]