User talk:Aldis90

Welcome!

Hello, Aldis90, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  BD2412 T 05:10, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I respectfully request permission to create a disambiguation page for "G41" and rename the G41 rifle page "Gewehr 41". There is an Imperial German torpedo boat SMS G41 and a Royal Navy destroyer HMS Panther (G41) which both have G41 in their names, in addition to the HK G41 rifle discussed previously. I will post this same message on the Talk pages of each of the WikiUsers listed on this discussion page. Pen of bushido 13:56, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Kwak Chae-U

Hi, thanks for moving that stuff. I hope you can make more edits to sort the article out - it needs all the help it can get. John Smith's 23:28, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A long-term vandal Roitr have created an account (User:Aldis90.) to impersonate you.--Nixer 18:11, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for helping to clear out the uncategorized pages backlog - your work is much appreciated! Please remember to remove the uncat template from articles after you're done; otherwise they'll stay in the category. Thanks again, Crystallina 01:11, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have posted a counter-proposal in re your proposal to merge Irish kilt / Welsh kilt into the main kilt article. Essentially, my counter-proposal is to take the content (slightly re-worked) of the current kilt article and create a Scottish kilt article out of it. There is an article entitled kilt variants which could then (after some re-working) become the new main kilt article and which would discuss all of the various types of kilts (including the modern or contemporary kilt and the school uniform skirt, the latter of which is referred to by many as a kilt, though some would say that term is a misnomer in that instance).

This plan would leave the articles on the individual types of kilts in place (some in need of expansion).

My main concern is not with the particular organization of the various kilt articles, but that the discussion and information on the Scottish kilt not be compromised.

Please let me know on my talk page (or on the kilt article talk page how you view this counter-proposal.

JFPerry 14:27, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Please be courteous to other editors and use edit summaries when updating articles. The Mathbot tool shows your usage of edit summaries to be very low:

Edit summary usage for Aldis90: 49% for major edits and 3% for minor edits. Based on the last 150 major and 150 minor edits in the article namespace.

Using edit summaries helps other editors quickly understand your edits, which is especially useful when you make changes to articles that are on others' watchlists. Thanks and happy editing! --Kralizec! (talk) 14:32, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much for your kind assistance with the pictures today. Much appreciated.

Noticed that you substitured the US naval jack for the US ensign on HMS Battler (D18). Are you aware of the discussions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ships/Archive05, sub-head "Always use ensigns?"? My interpretation is that ensigns are preferred, unless consensus is reached for use of the jack. Also, have a look at Wikipedia:WikiProject Ships, where there's a table of maritime flags. You can specify a US flag and a date and it will generate the historically correct flag. Hope this helps. Folks at 137 10:41, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted you edit of 21:08, 16 November 2006. It just didn't make sense to create such a gap in the middle of an article. Cheers, Camptown 22:30, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The category Turkish Navy ships is specially for ships not for ship classes. For this reason, i'm reverting your categorization. Regards. E104421 11:41, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for watching over Ranks_of_the_People's_Liberation_Army_Air_Force! In this particular edit [1] you didn't entirely resore the changes introduced by WP:LTA/Roitr. I wonder if it was intentional and some of the information is correct, or this was simply an error on your part? --Dmitry _{(talk •contibs )} 08:14, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages or sections with blank content. It is considered vandalism. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. --♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ ^{walkie-talkie} 03:17, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

--Ksyrie(Talkie talkie) 08:39, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you go there for further talking?--Ksyrie(Talkie talkie) 17:43, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, at least one of your recent edits was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Shalom ^Hello 19:15, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Russian Naval Aviation, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. 172.137.12.148 15:03, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I recreated the Russian Naval Aviation article few days ago. I noticed that you also tried to create it last month. So, if you are still interested to contribute, please feel free. Best regards, --Eurocopter tigre 20:22, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This material [2] you inserted appear to be a copy and paste from Jane's Armour and Artillery. This is not a good thing. Could you review the rest of your contributions and make sure there are no other similar copy and pastes. Thank you. Megapixie 02:57, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Having reviewed - maybe you just moved someone elses copyvio [3] ? Megapixie 02:59, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was just a move from someone else's entry in another article, remove it if it's copyvio. ---Aldis90

		The TomStar81 Spelling Award
		Be it known to all members of Wikipedia that Aldis90 has corrected my god-awful spelling on the page Colorado class battleship, and in doing so has made an important and very significant contribution to the Wikipedia community, thereby earning this TomStar81 Spelling Award and my deepest thanks. Keep up the good work! TomStar81 (Talk) 21:02, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Natsume Izayoi, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://galaxyangel.wikia.com/wiki/Natsume_Izayoi. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 22:08, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Message sent to user's page. --Aldis90

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 22:20, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is definitely a sock of Roitr. I reported him to: Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism and added the follwoing template to Skafults userpage:

{{Subst:sockpuppet|Roitr|evidence=[[Wikipedia:Long term abuse/Roitr]]}}

• Next time you find a sock of Roitr, copy and insert the above tag to the user page of the sock.
• Afterwards go to Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism and request a ban of the sock by inserting the following tag under "User-reported".

 * {{Vandal|sockname}} sock of banned vandal Roitr ([[Wikipedia:Long term abuse/Roitr]]). ~~~~ 

This will get the sock banned forever. --noclador 22:57, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message! I've been away from Wikipedia since June due to some health problems, so could you give me some update on where to look for his recent vandalism? I've already started a cleanup on my watched articles - hopefully this will cool the boy down and he would stop for a month or two, as it always happens when I wake up to log back on and start cleaning out his sh!t. :) --Dmitry _{(talk •contibs )} 16:29, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, have been in my watchlist forever... --Dmitry _{(talk •contibs )} 18:30, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, which wasn't included with your recent edit to New York class battleship. Thank you. Also on Montana class battleship. MBK004 03:23, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your recent edit in template: Republic of Korea Navy, I would like to inform you that the JPEG version does more accurately portray the South Korean naval jack. Please check the following link for the validity of my argument: http://forum.apan-info.net/fall99web/images/high/8-hap-2.jpg --Bin2k1 08:06, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, which wasn't included with your recent edit to Iowa class battleship. Thank you. Also on USS Midway (CV-41). Please, this common courtesy would help me especially on vandal-patrol. MBK004 02:13, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Aldis, as I noticed your good edits history, I thought you could be a precious member of the newly created Romanian Military history task force. So, if you have some time, please drop in and have a look! Best regards, --Eurocopter tigre (talk) 19:09, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Could you explain why you moved this article to Group Armies of the National Revolutionary Army, without any sort of discussion? (And also, "Army Group" to "Group Army" within the article.) You will find that "Army Group" is the translation used for 「集團軍」 within English publications by the NRA/ROCA and their affiliates. --Миборовский (talk) 00:11, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Who are these knowledgeable folks? I have a bunch of books and publications disagreeing with them. And even if the PLA uses "Group Army", the NRA/ROCA AFAIK do not. Миборовский (talk) 04:31, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, sources have to be reliable and verifiable, which forum postings are not. Not that I don't trust them, but I'd still trust my books more than forums. Миборовский (talk) 19:17, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Anything not from the CPC (and not from a website)? I refer you to 2 sources I have on hand at the moment: Hsu & Chang's History of the Sino Japanese War (1937-1945), which consistently uses "Army Group" (check the index) and Ho Ying-chin's Who Actually Fought the Sino-Japanese War 1937-45 ?, which refers to among other things "18th Army Group" and "Commander, Army Group". Миборовский (talk) 23:58, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Besides Hsu & Chang's book, there is a published book that is also on line in Chinese that covers the War from 1931 on.

• 中国抗日战争正面战场作战记 (China's Anti-Japanese War Combat Operations)
  • Guo Rugui, editor-in-chief Huang Yuzhang
  • Jiangsu People's Publishing House
  • Date published : 2005-7-1
  • ISBN 7214030349
  • Online in Chinese: http://www.wehoo.net/book/wlwh/a30012/04574.htm

This is a more recent mainland text, definately covers the pre 7/1937 parts of the conflict better than Hsu. Use of the Term "Army Group" in English may be different terms in Chinese simple characters which is 军团 Army Group. 集團軍 seems to be the traditional characters for Army Group. I think both should be put in the article to clear up the confusion. Asiaticus (talk) 09:35, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

About 2 weeks ago you said you'd look into some old sources regarding the translation for 集團軍, have you turned anything up? --Миборовский (talk) 05:51, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese swords, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Chinese swords satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chinese swords and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Chinese swords during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Burzmali (talk) 16:18, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

		Edit summary reminder
		Hello. I noticed that your edit to Honorary Citizen of the United States did not include an edit summary. Please remember to use one for every edit, even minor ones. You can enable the wiki software to prompt you for one before making an edit by setting your user preferences (under Editing) to "Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary". Thanks, -MBK004 23:53, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You need to see this - "travelled". "jewelled" etc are correct in UK English, and should NOT be changed in articles where this is used. 18:05, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

I just want to add some categories for them, if you've already deleted those, why didn't you do the same on Shiki. Besides, does Arcueid's page need that Phantasmoon section, why it couldn't move to trivia?OgasawaraSachiko (Contact me here) 09:14, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you remove categories from Marc Pourpe? Corvus cornix_talk 03:53, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How can you tell if they're subcategories? Corvus cornix_talk 23:27, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, thanks. Corvus cornix_talk 18:47, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Republic of Korea Navy ships, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. — Bellhalla (talk) 14:00, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People's Liberation Army Navy ships, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. — Bellhalla (talk) 14:10, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's article on Grand Marshal implies that the Republic of China had one or two ranks like Grand Marshal. Wikipedia's article on the Military of the Republic of China makes no reference to those ranks. Are they outdated? If so, as of when? I hoped you might know, since you recently made edits relating to that.

Also, the Grand Marshal article used to list Grand Marshal equivalent ranks for Imperial China, Communist China, and the Republic of China. But on 6 December 2007 someone deleted the links for Imperial China and Communist China, leaving just the Republic of China. Do you think they should be restored, given Wikipedia's new article for Da Yuan Shuai? - Shaheenjim (talk) 02:33, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Engineer combat group, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Engineer combat group. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Caerwine Caer’s whines 20:16, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a tad puzzled. Shouldn't this article be simply Klas Horn? -WarthogDemon 17:30, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your recent edit, because (going by the title) a flag in use from 1892 is not appropriate for a war that took place in 1866. If you have a justification for the change, why didn't you put it in the edit summary? Philip Trueman (talk) 18:18, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If there's something wrong with the old image, then shouldn't that be addressed there, not in the article on the war? And again, please use edit summaries. Thanks. Philip Trueman (talk) 18:27, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, which wasn't included with your recent edit to William D. Leahy. I nearly reverted your edit, seen here, because there was no WP:ES provided. Something like "-cat Category:American people of World War II because Category:American military personnel of World War II applies instead" would have been very helpful. — MrDolomite • Talk 05:01, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Poseidon class Supercarrier, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Terraxos (talk) 00:41, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article 1914 Shells of Fury, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Non-notable video game. No reliable sources cited.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. J Milburn (talk) 16:58, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article PLA Military Merit Medal, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Unsourced, no content.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.  Sandstein  19:39, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Order of the Precious Star, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Order of the Precious Star and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Order of the Precious Star during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Positronic (talk) 06:58, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:South Korean tanks, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:South Korean tanks has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:South Korean tanks, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 13:43, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed that you created Kaiserliche Armee, but listed no sources for the information contained in the article. According to Wikipedia's content policies, all information must be verifiable from reliable sources. Therefore, it's necessary to cite your sources so other editors can check that the information included in the article is correct and matches the sources used. Information not previously published in such sources is prohibited as original research, since other editors can't verify it. Unsourced information may be challenged and removed at any time, and articles that can't be verified are likely to be deleted. Guidance on how to cite your sources is available, and if you need any further help, feel free to leave a message on my talk page.--Unscented (talk) 19:42, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Could you take a look at Operation New Life to see whether it's an air operation or not? Thank. 207.233.67.205 (talk) 18:46, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can you tell me whether we could copy the contents from this webisite into wikipedia. Thank. 207.233.71.96 (talk) 01:44, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary for your edits. Thank you.  Cargoking  talk  23:39, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know, I've reverted your move of Zuni (rocket) to Zuni rocket. After a significant amount of discussion, it was decided that all rockets should be disambiguated using "(rocket)" not "rocket". For further details, please see WP:RND. You also failed to provide an edit summary for your move, which would have been helpful. Thanks. --GW… 12:11, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The official name for the reserve force in Republic of Korea is Republic of Korea Reserve Forces.
Homeland Reserve Forces is one of the branch under Reserve Forces. Kadrun (talk) 21:11, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I noticed you added specs to the Pratt & Whitney PW1000G, which is great! Can you please add a reference sources for those specs as per Template:Jetspecs? The specifications sections is really one of those where we have to have a verifiable ref. Thanks! -SidewinderX (talk) 00:01, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Shenyang J-11, as minor if (and only if) they genuinely are minor edits (see Help:Minor edit). Marking a major change as a minor one is considered poor etiquette. The rule of thumb is that only an edit that consists solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes, or rearranging of text without modifying content should be flagged as a 'minor edit.' Thank you. If you'd simply left us a note in the edit summary this wouldn't be necessary. This is a community project and using the edit summary for each edit is not only recommended, but it's also polite. Dawnseeker2000 00:58, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I have re-added this category to the Panzer_I page: "Category:Armoured fighting vehicles of the interwar period" as per that page and elsewhere, this tank does belong in that category.

Thanks, RobertMfromLI | User Talk STP2: Producer/Gaffer/Webmaster 04:25, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

You just reverted a version that was vandalized: "which was to be armored against enemy anti-sex weapons and have a

large 75-millimeter (2.95 in) penis. "

Would you like to try to fix it? There may be other vandalism in that version as well. Oh, btw, the previous version has been vandalized as well... was just about to address that before your revert. So, I will leave it up to you.

Best,

RobertMfromLI | User Talk STP2: Producer/Gaffer/Webmaster 04:50, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved List of Korean Flags to the new title. Please don't do Copy&Paste moves in the future as it is important for attribution reasons that the page's history stay with the page. You can read more at {{Uw-c&pmove}} Cheers, -- Flyguy649 ^talk 16:45, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Aldis I have created an article with the name Qing Pu Prison, per some western newspapers, so if you are sure Qingpu is correct then we can change the page name, cheers --Matt (talk) 04:54, 29 March 2010 (UTC) My apologies a glitch of some sort in the system, my edit failed to save for some reason and I misread the history and thought you had reverted it, apologies and happy editing --Matt (talk) 05:00, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You seem to be the most active/consistent contributer to Springfield Model 1865. I noticed a potential inconsistency between the article's 3rd and 6th paragraphs in discussing the purpose of the conversion process being for the model 1863 and 1861 muskets, respectively. Since the 1863 is basically a variant of the 1861, would it be proper to reference the 1861 in both paragraphs, or am I missing something? Cheers! Kevin. --Kevin Murray (talk) 05:58, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to T-90 has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. (Hohum ^@) 18:50, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 02:32, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to People's Liberation Army. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you.
You seem to need regular reminders about this. This is causing you & the rest of us grief. Therefore I urge you, to avoid accidentally leaving edit summaries blank, to select "Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" on the Editing tab of your user preferences. Trafford09 (talk) 21:16, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Battle of Vienna. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page.

Wikipedia relies on wp:consensus, and our all adhering to its guidelines.

One such is wp:ES#Always provide an edit summary. Please adhere to it, or state why the consensus doesn't apply in your case. Trafford09 (talk) 07:06, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Robert Corey. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Trafford09 (talk) 06:58, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Don't we all just love Wikipedia? It gives us many free rights:

• the right to open our own account
• the right to edit articles
• the right for other people to come and help us, when we put {{help}} here
• the right to look up anything on a huge encyclopedia

And what does Wikipedia ask, in return for all this? Well, not very much at all:

• Wikipedia asks that we all follow some simple rules, to help everybody.
• One of the these rules is wp:ES#Always provide an edit summary.

This is not much to ask, and it is not difficult.

But you seem to find it not just difficult, but impossible?

Maybe you are a Special Person? Please could you tell us why you are so Special?

... or perhaps you would consider setting a good example, and following the rules, like the rest of us ... Trafford09 (talk) 07:02, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Template:Buddhist monasteries in Sichuan. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Trafford09 (talk) 11:31, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tip Of The Day

Please summarize your work using the "Edit summary box". If you make anything other than a minor edit to an article, it helps others if you fill in the edit summary. Edit summaries are visible in the page history, watchlists, and on Recent changes, so they help others users keep track of what's happening to a page. If you use section editing, the summary box is filled in with the section heading by default (in gray text), which you can follow with more detail. You also can put links to articles in the edit summary. Just put double brackets around [[the article title]] like you would normally. The summary is limited to 200 characters, so many people use common abbreviations, such as sp for correcting spelling mistakes. Read more: Edit summary

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to T27 Armored Car. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Trafford09 (talk) 22:59, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on SANY Group Company Ltd. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Eeekster (talk) 01:52, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with SANY Group Company Ltd.. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 01:58, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with SANY Group Company Ltd.. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Eeekster (talk) 02:13, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to List of Korean flags, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Trafford09 (talk) 19:47, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you disagree about the T/W ratio then you should take it up on the talks page first. The ratio is calculated on all aircraft pages as the sourced weight divided by the sourced thrust. The J-11's weight is higher than the Su-27SK and since there is no increase in thrust its T/W is lower than the on the Su-27SK. If you wish to refute this then you argue on the talks page, not by starting an edit war -Nem1yan (talk) 13:04, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to State Security Service. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. This edit is by no means a 'minor' edit. Please state why you think consensus on wp:ES#Always provide an edit summary doesn't apply in your Special case? Trafford09 (talk) 13:25, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia ads	file info – #2

Trafford09 (talk) 13:30, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May I please remind you of the Wikipedia definition of a minor edit. A number of your recent edits don't meet that definition, but you have still marked them as minor. - David Biddulph (talk) 09:29, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a {{main}} article for this cat? There's a redlink on the Contentious article for air-portable that ought to be pointing to the same place. Should be an interesting article, if anyone has the time to go for it. Andy Dingley (talk) 18:40, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FWiW Bzuk (talk) 03:07, 25 December 2011 (UTC).[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, University of Science and Technology Liaoning , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Rincewind42 (talk) 02:52, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It has been proposed that Daimler 2.5 & 4.5 litre, to which you have contributed, be moved to "Daimler V8 engine". Your input into the discussion would be welcome. Sincerely, SamBlob (talk) 21:11, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you have added several entries without any citations. I will leave them until tomorrow and then revert unless citations are provided. Thanks JunoBeach (talk) 20:22, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Liu Huaqing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tiananmen Square protests (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:48, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Guizhou WS-13, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page J-31 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:45, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Muslim Generals has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. You are encouraged to join the discussion on the Categories for discussion page. Place Clichy (talk) 08:47, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited People's Liberation Army Naval Air Force, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Z-8 and Z-9 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:13, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to House of Yi may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
is [[Deokhye, Princess of Korea|Princess Deokhye (''Deokhye ongju'' 덕혜옹주)]], Gojong's last child.)]] {{familytree | |,|-|-|-|(| }} {{familytree | |,|-|-|-|(| |}} {{familytree | |,|-|-|-|(| | | | | | | |!| }} {{familytree | |,|-|-|-|(| | | | | | | |!| }}

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:13, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

		Strategic Barnstar
		For your hard work and due diligence creating or editing strategic deterrent related articles or Ballistic missile submarine related pages, you have been awarded the Strategic Barnstar. Your outstanding performance provides significant and long lasting benefits to Wikipedia, Congratulations! Signed: Legohead1my_talk 16:14, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]	This editor has been awarded the Strategic Barnstar for creating or editing strategic deterrent related articles.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited PL-10 (ASR), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page J-20. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Walter Christie has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NPOL. Searches produce nothing credible.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 01:43, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Gongchantang. Since you had some involvement with the Gongchantang redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 08:49, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited DM2A4, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PBX. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:03, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Irregular warfare has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Neologism sourced almost entirely to primary sources - the entire article is basically a summary of how the term has been used by various government agencies and cited to the primary documents. This should redirect to the main article Asymmetric warfare.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Seraphim System ^(talk) 22:57, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Irregular warfare is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Irregular warfare until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Seraphim System ^(talk) 06:42, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding references to Mozi. I'd like to encourage you to use more complete references rather than bare links which can rot. Let me know if you have any questions. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:58, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, North America Arms Corporation, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 08:45, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, 6B27, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. New articles generally need at least two (but preferably more) references from reliable sources that are independent of the subject that discuss the subject with significant coverage (trivial mentions do not contribute to notability).^{(See Rule 42)} Information that can't be referenced to reliable sources should be removed from the draft because verifiability is necessary for information added to Wikipedia.
I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of Draft: before the article title) where you can work on the article with minimal disruption from other users while you improve it.
When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready to be published, you can move it back to the article space yourself. However, I recommend that instead of moving it yourself that you follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template that I have added to the page. This submits the article to be reviewed by experienced editors that specialize in helping new editors write their first articles. Edaham (talk) 05:58, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Byton K-Byte, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sedan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 02:23, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aldis90. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "6B27".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:19, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good day. On Polish Wikipedia article concerning this bayonet was nominated for deletion. Reason is: very short description and total lack of sources. The same concern English version. Can you give any sources and/or oteher information, thus suppoort keeping article? Best regards. Ciacho5 (talk) 09:54, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Alpina Roadster S into Alpina B3 S (E46). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 13:22, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article CS/LS5 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:N, in English at least, there are no sources that give even a basic overview of the weapon

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Loafiewa (talk) 06:12, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Loafiewa (talk) 20:05, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from http://chinesewatchwiki.net/Beijing_Watch_Factory, which is not released under a compatible license. Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0) is not a compatible license. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, some content had to be removed. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please let me know if you have any questions. — Diannaa (talk) 15:25, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Aldis90! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Aichi M6A that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 16:36, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Beijing Watch Factory has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no apparent notability -- just a directory entry

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 01:32, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DGG ( talk ) 23:17, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Chaheel Riens (talk) 11:54, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Out of your last 1,500 contributions you don't seem to have used a single edit summary... Chaheel Riens (talk) 11:55, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Loafiewa. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, QJS-161, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Loafiewa (talk) 20:16, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, ZF S6-40 transmission, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~Styyx^Talk? 22:29, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Aldis90 Many thanks for your recent edit to Naval Blockade of Reval linking it to Category: Blockades involving the United Kingdom. Have you read the notes on the talk page of that article Talk:Naval Blockade of Reval (1726) and perhaps considered developing the theme of containing the Russians? I am mostly retired from Wiki-editing but keep an eye on my watchlist! Thanks again Viking1808 (talk) 16:58, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aldis90. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:ZF S6-40 transmission, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aldis90. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "ZF S6-40 transmission".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 22:32, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Type 93 60mm mortar. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:39, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People of the Democratic Republic of Afghanistan has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 20:54, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm HumanBodyPiloter5. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Alfa Romeo Stelvio seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 07:50, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Aldis90! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 07:50, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 07:50, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aldis90. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Type 93 60mm mortar, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:06, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 April 12#Category:Politicians of the Democratic Republic of Afghanistan. – Fayenatic London 21:49, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aldis90, I noticed that you are marking a high number of edits as minor that are definitely not minor edits. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Minor edit is also very clear that category additions or removals should not be marked as minor edits. Thank you. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:52, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Defence Planning Committee (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Disambiguation page not required (WP:ONEOTHER). Primary topic redirect points to an article with a hatnote to the only other use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:58, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 November 17 § Category:Melee weapons on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 03:49, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]