Talk:HQ-9

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

China High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Military history: Technology / Weaponry / Asian / Chinese This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Military science, technology, and theory task force Weaponry task force Asian military history task force Chinese military history task force

Is HQ-9 another high quality copy of foreign military equipmen(e.g. S-300)?93.223.34.22 (talk) 19:56, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on HQ-9. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061207041746/http://www.sinodefence.com:80/army/surfacetoairmissile/hq9.asp to http://www.sinodefence.com/army/surfacetoairmissile/hq9.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:57, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Wikipedians,I've made a mistake and I don't know how to deal with it. 王俊玮 (talk) 09:47, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure, but I don't think HQ-19, HQ-26, HQ-29 are variants of HQ-9. If they aren't, they should probably get individual articles.2A00:EE2:6203:1200:8CD8:1C94:6992:85ED (talk) 12:42, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on HQ-9. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061230045751/http://sinodefence.com/navy/navalmissile/hq9naval.asp to http://www.sinodefence.com/navy/navalmissile/hq9naval.asp
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061021162332/http://www.sinodefence.com/army/surfacetoairmissile/ks1.asp to http://www.sinodefence.com/army/surfacetoairmissile/ks1.asp
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150716164547/http://www.wantchinatimes.com/news-subclass-cnt.aspx?id=20150402000058&cid=1101 to http://www.wantchinatimes.com/news-subclass-cnt.aspx?id=20150402000058&cid=1101
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151006082024/http://www.wantchinatimes.com/news-subclass-cnt.aspx?id=20150706000005&cid=1101 to http://www.wantchinatimes.com/news-subclass-cnt.aspx?id=20150706000005&cid=1101
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061207041746/http://www.sinodefence.com/army/surfacetoairmissile/hq9.asp to http://www.sinodefence.com/army/surfacetoairmissile/hq9.asp
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061230045751/http://sinodefence.com/navy/navalmissile/hq9naval.asp to http://www.sinodefence.com/navy/navalmissile/hq9naval.asp
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060506100233/http://missilethreat.com/systems/hq-9_china.html to http://www.missilethreat.com/systems/hq-9_china.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:08, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on HQ-9. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061210224016/http://www.nti.org/db/china/imisr.htm to http://www.nti.org/db/china/imisr.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111001082539/http://www.kanwa.com/free/2003/06/e0603a.htm to http://www.kanwa.com/free/2003/06/e0603a.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130714001451/http://www.armyrecognition.com/china_chinese_army_missile_systems_vehicles/hq-9_ground-to-air_medium_range_air_defense_missile_technical_data_sheet_specifications_pictures_.html to http://www.armyrecognition.com/china_chinese_army_missile_systems_vehicles/hq-9_ground-to-air_medium_range_air_defense_missile_technical_data_sheet_specifications_pictures_.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:44, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Where do these missiles get mid-course guidance from? AEW aircraft? Aircraft from carriers? Satellites? All of the above? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.28.231.63 (talk) 05:04, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a naval variant of the HQ-9B? And if so, what's it called? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.25.65.92 (talk) 19:20, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]