Talk:Equijubus

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Dinosaurs Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Palaeontology Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

"The type species, Equijubus normani, was described by You, Luo, Shubin, Witmer, Tang, and Tang in 2003 as a primitive hadrosaur ("duck-billed" dinosaur), although it may turn out to be a non-hadrosauroid iguanodont."

This is the altercation I made. The original line read "may turn out to be an iguanodont". I changed it because it implied the two were mutually exclusive cases, when they are not. If Equijubus is a hadrosaur, then of course, it is also an iguanodont, because hadrosaurs are nested within Iguanodontia. I assume the intent was to imply that Equijubus may be more basal than the Hadrosauroidea (unlikely but still), so I've tried to stay true to that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.61.212.116 (talk) 11:37, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]