Talk:1998

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Lists Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Years Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Time Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Time, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Time on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TimeWikipedia:WikiProject TimeTemplate:WikiProject TimeTime articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

There is a discussion on my talk page on page layout. this dint tell me nothing For most of the last three hundred years there is inconsistency and duplication between the year in topic paragraph, the "see also" box and what is on the year by topic pages. Prior to 1950 I am pretty convinced we can painlessly (except for sore fingers) delete all of the year in topic paragraphs and ensure that the material goes into a "see also" box, creating such a box where none exists. Post 1950, particularly from the "year in US television" link a lot of material has been added to this paragraph as highlights (sometimes making up most of the page content pointed at).

Personally I think we should still delete the paragraph, keep the box linking to the topic sites and move any particularly important parts of the year in topic paragraph to the main chronological list. This does involve undoing quite a bit of work which someone has done.

Therefore, unlike for prior to 1950 (where I've said no objection= I do it) for post 1950 I won't touch these pages unless a significant number of people agree with the change. (I am also unlikely to get the pre 1950 stuff done before summer unless the service speed improves dramatically). talk--BozMo 13:39, 7 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

shouldn't it be mentioned windows 98 came out? that was an important thing —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.15.216.208 (talk) 14:24, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It was indeed, Windows 98 was revolutionary (globally) and before Windows XP it was the most used OS. I personally think its date of release should be noted. Dilbaggg (talk) 08:02, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's nonsense, the Court was instituted by the European Convention on Human Rights in 1950. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 163.1.105.57 (talk) 16:21, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

LTCM bail-out, Russian crisis and default... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.195.71.41 (talk) 08:30, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

An image used in this article, File:Kenya bombing 1.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests May 2012 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Kenya bombing 1.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 18:01, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 14, 1998 I think it was a significant moment in TV history. Shouldn't it be mentioned? Rayansb (talk) 23:32, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's for 1998 in American television. Jim Michael (talk) 14:50, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1998. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100403034332/http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/features/1998/year/ to http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/features/1998/year/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:52, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1998. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070402030016/http://www.work-at-home-net-guides.com/articles/history-of-google.html to http://www.work-at-home-net-guides.com/articles/history-of-google.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:05, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

• XXXTentacionFebruary2018 (cropped).png

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. Community Tech bot (talk) 23:51, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

• Shawn Mendes at The Queen's Birthday Party (cropped 2).jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:11, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

See WT:YEARS#Eclipses for a matter relevant to this page. Arthur Rubin (alternate) (talk) 23:09, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Shawn Mendes Glamour May 2018.png

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:37, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please let me know if anyone has any disagreements on the images included in the collage, and I will put it up for vote. Thanks The ganymedian (talk) 22:45, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

• 1998 Events Collage.png

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:36, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Under Deaths, for July, please add actress Sylvia Field for July 31. https://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/fl-xpm-1998-08-12-9808110425-story.html 2600:100C:A206:F6CD:CC6D:1BB3:6327:1ACE (talk) 06:45, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{Edit semi-protected}} template. They are likely not notable enough for the main year article. Perhaps 1998 in the United States? ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:58, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It actually came out on November 19, not November 8. The Steam store page uses an incorrect release date. AppleiBend6 (talk) 20:29, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The collage used features a modern picture of the Google webpage. Would it be bad to replace that with an image of Google as it appeared back in 1998? – MrPersonHumanGuy (talk) 21:13, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

👫👫 103.179.181.199 (talk) 21:10, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tapachuu fee naan nubira koottA 175.110.56.74 (talk) 18:02, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]